Cool concept that brings a little structure to prompts. I wouldn't use the semantic part that much, English is fine for this, but there is a real need for machine instructions. There is no need for an LLM guess if "main" is a function or a file for exemple.
dmundhra · 3m ago
How is it different than DSPy?
Disposal8433 · 1h ago
The new COBOL. The next step is obviously to add syntax when you need to specify the type of the variables: put the type first, then the name and its value, and finish with a semicolon because it's fun, like "int n = 0;"
benswerd · 1h ago
How do you think about remote configurability?
Stuff like a lot of this needing to be A/B tested, models hot swapped, and versioned in a way thats accessible to non technical people?
How do you think about this in relation to tools like BAML?
mrs6969 · 1h ago
Nice try. We will eventually get there, but I think this can and need to get better.
machiaweliczny · 1h ago
Why not library?
yewenjie · 1h ago
What is a motivating use case that this solves?
siva7 · 9m ago
Probably erotic roleplay or gambling with better control to squeeze more money out from the user. Like "awwww charleen i love you so much" -> tool call to payment api gets triggered
otabdeveloper4 · 1h ago
Riding the LLM hype train to its exhaustion.
N_Lens · 1h ago
ChooChoo!
devops000 · 57m ago
Why not as a library in Ruby or Python?
croes · 1h ago
Next step, an LLM that writes convo-lang programs to programs with an LLM
bn-l · 1h ago
It’s a noisy / busy syntax. Just my own opinion.
gnubee · 1h ago
This looks a lot like another effective way of interacting with LLMs: english-lang. Some of english-lang 's features are that it can be used to convey meaning, and it's largely accepted (network effect!). I'm excited to see what convo brings to the table /s
Stuff like a lot of this needing to be A/B tested, models hot swapped, and versioned in a way thats accessible to non technical people?
How do you think about this in relation to tools like BAML?