Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked

56 juujian 58 8/6/2025, 12:37:00 PM arstechnica.com ↗

Comments (58)

afavour · 35m ago
They specifically created a "spicy" mode, I'm quite sure they know what they're doing. I'm sure we'll get a shocked pikachu face statement soon saying they couldn't possibly have predicted this would happen and they'll make double triple sure it never happens again.

It is... interesting to see xAI's moves lately. Other AI companies seem very determined to show themselves with a publicly acceptable face, xAI seem to be tacking for the gap in the market around adult content. If you browsed Reddit's /r/grok a couple of months ago it looked a lot like /r/openai. Now it's full of people talking about the "Ani" AI companion and the various adult things you can get her to do.

I'm sure they'll make an absolute ton of money from the male loneliness epidemic. All the while Musk decries falling birth rates.

potato3732842 · 1m ago
Reminds me of the contrast people noted between search engines[1]. xAI is gonna get good at serving its market. And if it's market is "spicy" it's gonna get good at that. The other AI companies are gonna get good at their own niches too.

[1]https://img.ifunny.co/images/237a897c7058903fa2f5bb5fd0f9949...

Joker_vD · 26m ago
> At that point, all Weatherbed did was select "spicy" and confirm her birth date for Grok to generate a clip of Swift tearing "off her clothes" and "dancing in a thong" in front of "a largely indifferent AI-generated crowd."

I am honestly baffled at what she suspected would, or should, be the output. Like, seriously, what?

Aurornis · 18m ago
I don’t think it’s reasonable at all for “spicy” to instantly take someone to fake pornography of a specific person.

When I saw the “spicy” option I thought it was about being sassy or playfully mean instead of the sanitized LLM voice.

Not straight to porn.

firefax · 7m ago
On the other hand, Swift is a public figure, and with that comes parody -- I'd be more sympathetic if it was a private individual, but existing harassment and defamation laws could handle that most likely. Fake (insert celebrity) Photoshops have been with us since the 90s.

>When I saw the “spicy” option I thought it was about being sassy or playfully mean instead of the sanitized LLM voice.

Yeah, I thought it would just not have NSFW restrictions, I find the idea someone's like "What's the value of twenty dollars from 1920 adjusted for inflation" and suddenly you're got the guy from the Gangam Style video screaming into a butt but it's the Pope's face or something.

Internal server error