Is this dailymail style editorial appropriate for Wikipedia?
treetalker · 2h ago
To play the devil's advocate: citing Laura Loomer's mug as an example is a slander to Mar-a-Lago–faced folks everywhere. Her "signature look" is best considered as an anti-model for future surgeons and operees.
cobbzilla · 1h ago
I frankly didn’t know much about Kristi Noam until the most recent South Park piqued my curiosity. I found this fascinating gem of an article diving into a wikipedia rabbit hole.
moralestapia · 2h ago
Despicable, really.
So now it's suddenly ok to ridicule the appearance of women Weren't they supposed to be their allies? What a bunch of sc*mbags.
Never giving a cent to Wikipedia ever, as it is clear it is now a political platform, away from its intended purpose, and for one very specific country.
So now it's suddenly ok to ridicule the appearance of women Weren't they supposed to be their allies? What a bunch of sc*mbags.
Never giving a cent to Wikipedia ever, as it is clear it is now a political platform, away from its intended purpose, and for one very specific country.
Weird.