I am not against google but apple should get the same treatment.
Velorivox · 4h ago
Time to buckle up for more of this [0] awesomeness, now coming to a Play store near you. Problems created by tech illiterate elders, for tech illiterate elders.
Don't worry, the Play Store is already filled with must-have apps like "Phone Cleaner - AI Cleaner" and "Ora Battery, Cleaner Antivirus".
pjmlp · 45m ago
The worse part of it are the OEMs, like they have been doing since the days of CP/M, MS-DOS, 8 and 16 bit home computers, and UNIX OEMs offerings, having those products pre-installed for "added value".
At least back then they were additional tapes, floppies, CDs, DVDs, that we could ignore they were ever part of the bundle.
JdeBP · 3m ago
Back then they had the important property, which is what is at issue above, of having known provenance. We knew whence we got them.
The relevant thing here isn't the naff quality of the supposed utilities, but the fact that there's such a plethora of that kind of stuff for malwares to masquerade as. The better analogy to the 1970s and 1980s and 1990s would be that people were impersonating legitimate sharewares back then, even getting onto cover-discs, just as they impersonate legitimate "store apps" now.
The point being (badly and prejudicially) made it seems is that the next step is impersonating legitimate "app stores".
At which point, cue "app store" analogues of all of the Linux-based operating system people and the well-trodden perennial arguments over "contrib" and "UR" and suchlike package repositories, from I'm-safe-I'll-only-use-the-official-app-store to why-should-I-trust-any-store-above-the-original-author.
[0] https://securelist.com/open-source-package-for-cursor-ai-tur...
At least back then they were additional tapes, floppies, CDs, DVDs, that we could ignore they were ever part of the bundle.
The relevant thing here isn't the naff quality of the supposed utilities, but the fact that there's such a plethora of that kind of stuff for malwares to masquerade as. The better analogy to the 1970s and 1980s and 1990s would be that people were impersonating legitimate sharewares back then, even getting onto cover-discs, just as they impersonate legitimate "store apps" now.
The point being (badly and prejudicially) made it seems is that the next step is impersonating legitimate "app stores".
At which point, cue "app store" analogues of all of the Linux-based operating system people and the well-trodden perennial arguments over "contrib" and "UR" and suchlike package repositories, from I'm-safe-I'll-only-use-the-official-app-store to why-should-I-trust-any-store-above-the-original-author.