Bohemians at the Gate? (inferencemagazine.substack.com)
32 points by surprisetalk 2d ago 35 comments
Cuss: Map of profane words to a rating of sureness (github.com)
41 points by tosh 2d ago 33 comments
Cuss: Map of profane words to a rating of sureness
41 tosh 33 5/31/2025, 10:18:40 AM github.com ↗
One of the most prime examples, at one point a number of terms related to homosexuality had made it onto the list at the request of a larger district. These are also terms that are being reclaimed, and it was... a difficult problem to try to satisfy everyone, and it did upset other districts. I believe their patterns were all but removed eventually.
We have a fought over the list of definitions and every change provoked controversy. Our current solution is just that we mark items for teacher review but don't tell them why. We don't say they are offensive, we don't say what the problematic words are. We just say it might need review. That's worked pretty well so far.
All this is to say, policing speech is a problem best avoided.
Which is to say… policing speech is a problem best avoided!
I can kind of see "was this a word they considered and scored, vs. not considered?" when trying to assess whether the project is comprehensive, but from a programming standpoint, it just seems like it's going to have a lot of useless overhead, since by the time I'm looking up the word I don't care whether it's a zero or a miss.
(I also find the scoring of "2" for many of the words to be weird, like "yank," "chug," "looser" etc. as they can all have perfectly normal meanings.)
types something in live chat
some random word from the sentence gets censored out
"Why did this just got censored out?"
check urban disctionary
"Why?????"
Bonus points if its regular ethnonyms that are classified as profanities, so people from that place are having big trouble to tell where they are from.
Would have probably saved them from the Mitsibishi Pajero, Ford Pinto, Mazda Laputa
Downside is, it doesn’t analyze phonetics afaict. The hebrew Volkswagen Beetle (Hipushit) would have passed as fine.
https://arxiv.org/search/?query=fuck&searchtype=all&source=h...
though somebody did slip in a use in a comment earlier.
And then fails to do that for words that are not uncommonly written with a space https://github.com/words/cuss/blob/6bab3fef250481e34ba55bc40...
Making this a complete list will probably be a challenge when it needs to be a byte-for-byte match
When it comes to security, the only thing that beats warm fuzzy words are shiny security seals.
addict africa amateur american angry arab
From just this short list and a handful of other words I looked at, they seem to have done a reasonable job of classifying them, even if I see other issues such as completeness and what even is the purpose
It used to mean "certainty", as when T. H. Howard writes, "Uncertainty about our religious condition is quite as unsatisfactory as any doubt about our most sacred domestic relationships. Sureness is vital to peace, and the truly sanctified soul will live in the region of certainty."
But in more modern usage the word has a connotation slightly different from what the author of this library intends. Its meaning is closer to "assuredness": confidence matched with ability. For example, "Proust had an incredible sureness of touch in shedding this prophetic ray on his characters." (again from Edith Wharton).
I don't remember it being like this decades ago. Is it just me? I remember people used to curse only in private conversation, when angry, and never at the office in meetings and professional contexts.
I first went to grad school ~20 years ago, and no one cursed in class, especially not the professors.
I recently went back to school and got another masters, and nearly all the mid-20-year-olds drop f-bombs in regular classroom talk to the professor constantly, like they don't even hear that they're doing it. Some professors don't mind, and even respond in kind (though much more self-consciously), some are clearly displeased, but the students barely notice.