Neural Nets vs. Cellular Automata (nets-vs-automata.net)
58 points by todsacerdoti 2d ago 8 comments
Reverse Engineering All the Raspberry Pis (jeffgeerling.com)
97 points by speckx 15h ago 25 comments
Craft Basic (Windows 95 and up)
59 lintalist 10 5/18/2025, 9:08:11 AM lucidapogee.com ↗
> .. work at a gas station and don't make money coding.
(From the readme of one of his other projects.)
If self-proclaimed "senior software engineers" worked on this, we would have a multi gigabyte download with an Electron-based editor.
There's a donation link in there with a very fair asking price.
On Amstrad CPC 464 / 6128, you just entered the interpreter, you could immediately interact with existing code and start playing around with it.
Today, it's more complex, because the Operating System developers deliver more complex APIs to fit the needs of the plethora of developers, and the level of abstraction, and responsibilities of each teams / components.
Though natural selection tends to favor the simpler / more friendly languages (Python / Javascript), and others like Haskell, Erlang, Lisp, etc... are just for people in museums who see beauty in complexity.
Some say:
Simples see beauty in complexity. Smarts see beauty in simplicity.
This project is evidently coded against Win32 and runs on any Windows OS in the last 30 years.
Which is to say the "operating system developers" provided APIs in 1995 that are still there, still work.
Last I checked, Electron isn't an OS API.
https://www.youtube.com/@Bisqwit/
I'm a "senior software engineer" by title (I need to make more money than I would working at a gas station or driving a truck, and programming is what I'm relatively good at), I love things like this, and I fight for simplicity and lack of bloat whenever I can, sometimes putting myself at odds with my colleagues and Management.
991k ruby.exe*
I wrote performance monitor in it for fun: http://borg.uu3.net/~borg/?gperf
> Win9X, Win2K, WinXP ,Win10, Win11
Gee, isn't it cool to have stable API/ABI?