One would wish the 'unintended consequences' of his work he should be tackling now would include the irrepairability, planned obsolescence and negative environmental impact the Apple products he designed have had just because of the sake of "aesthetics" or "I want to be the next Dieter Rams", but whatever.
rumori · 10h ago
Excluding their cables Apple products held up incredibly well for me. Maybe I’m just lucky but they outlasted every single Android phone and non Apple laptop. It would be interesting to see actual statistics about the average lifespan of each category.
anon373839 · 9h ago
Same. Apple products have very long physical lifespans, generally receive software support far longer than competitors’, and typically have good resale value after several years of use.
rchaud · 11h ago
The kind of work you speak of isn't going to get highlighted at opulent photo op events like "an interview with Stripe". Necessity is the mother of invention, so conservation and repairability advances are being made where they are most needed: poor countries, where people can't afford to just throw thing away because the vendor forcibly EOL'd it. [0]
Ive’s thinness obsession played a huge part in Apple developing the designs that permitted the M series becoming the computers with the best thermal profiles with great compute.
multimoon · 17h ago
Is it bad that I’m pleased he’s struggling to stay relevant solo? This guy is responsible for the greater majority of dumb decisions Apple made and their products got instantly better the moment his influence was gone.
cma · 2h ago
I have a feeling iPod's popularity had more tondo with buying up exclusive access to mini harddrives than the industrial design. Same harddrive maker deals extended to the smaller drives on the iPod mini. iPhone typically gets exclusive access to TSMC's latest nodes a year ahead of competitors. Same with airpods, getting the power draw to that level about a year before most others using their exclusive access to a TSMC node.
Having a big enough brand that buying out exclusive access to new tech isn't a huge risk is key, though they probably got the iPod HD exclusivity very cheap and weren't so big then. Then having the exclusive access builds on the quality and mystique of the brand and makes it less risky to buy in again on the next wave of exclusivity.
theandrewbailey · 15h ago
The buggy and unintuitive software has gotten worse, though.
jerlam · 15h ago
The cynic in me read the headline and thought "he's making the next Rabbit r1 or Humane AI Pin".
disqard · 15h ago
I'm inclined to agree. He has moved from the Reality Distortion Field of Jobs to that of Altman.
rchaud · 11h ago
That's where the money is, and by extension, that's the product category where "Design" wankery is likely to still have enough cachet to not induce eye-rolls.
petepete · 20h ago
So he's working on something but it's a mystery. Slow news day.
hyperbovine · 20h ago
Whatever it is, he's working on shaving 0.3mm from it.
not_your_mentat · 14h ago
You have permission to get excited in advance.
vanattab · 19h ago
Slimy...
casey2 · 19h ago
"Did I mention that I invented the iPhone"
chgs · 19h ago
Still bitter that it the ivePhone branding didn’t stick
[0] https://www.theverge.com/tech/639126/india-frankenstein-lapt...
Ive’s thinness obsession played a huge part in Apple developing the designs that permitted the M series becoming the computers with the best thermal profiles with great compute.
Having a big enough brand that buying out exclusive access to new tech isn't a huge risk is key, though they probably got the iPod HD exclusivity very cheap and weren't so big then. Then having the exclusive access builds on the quality and mystique of the brand and makes it less risky to buy in again on the next wave of exclusivity.