Prepare your apps for Google Play's 16 KB page size compatibility requirement (android-developers.googleblog.com)

The problem is that this is $100/mo with limits. At work I use Cursor, which is pretty good (especially tab completion), and at home I use Copilot in vscode insiders build, which is catching up to Cursor IMO.

However, as long as Microsoft is offering copilot at (presumably subsidized) $10/mo, I'm not interested in paying 10x as much and still having limits. It would have to be 10x as useful, and I doubt that.

ramoz · 3h ago

Doesn’t resonate with me because I’ve spent over $1,000 on Claude Code at this point and the return is worth it. The spend feels cheap compared to output.

In contrast - I’m not interested in using cheaper, less-than, services for my livelihood.

satvikpendem · 1h ago

> the return is worth it

I'm curious, what was the return? What did you do with the 1k?

edoceo · 1h ago

Produce working code faster => ship faster => paid faster? That's the valu-prop right? So, naturally the $JOB will cover the bill.

bdangubic · 32m ago

so you didn’t spend a penny? :)

hcnews · 1h ago

Could you anonymize and share your last 5-10 prompts? Just wanna understand how people are using Claude Code.

winrid · 48m ago

"Ensure all our crons publish to telegraf when they start and finish. Include the cron name and tenant id when applicable. For crons that query batch jobs, only publish and take a lock when there is work to do. look at <snip> as an example. Here is the complete list to migrate. Create a todo list and continue until done. <insert list of 40 file paths>"

(updated for better example)

tkzed49 · 2h ago

hey, I'm open to that possibility. Maybe I'll grab $5 in API credit and give it a shot (for 5 minutes or a week depending on who you ask)

keerthiko · 2h ago

i got $100 of credit at the start of the year, and have been using +1$ each month, starting at $2 in january using aider at the time. just switched to claude code this week, since it follows a similar UX. agentic CLI code assist really has been growing in usefulness for me as i get faster at reviewing its output.

i use it for very targeted operations where it saves me several roundtrips to code examples and documentation and stack overflow, not spamming it for every task i need to do, i spend about $1/day of focused feature development, and it feels like it saves me about 50% as many hours as i spend coding while using it.

stavros · 1h ago

What do you prefer, between Aider and CC? I use Aider for when I want to vibe code (I just give the LLM a high-level description and then don't check the output, because it's so long), and Cursor when I want to AI code (I tell the AI to do low-level stuff and check every one of the five lines it gives me).

AI coding saves me a lot of time writing high-quality code, as it takes care of the boilerplate and documentation/API lookups, while I still review every line, and vibe coding lets me quickly do small stuff I couldn't do before (e.g. write a whole app in React Native), but gets really brittle after a certain (small) codebase size.

I'm interested to hear whether Claude Code writes less brittle code, or how you use it/what your experience with it is.

richardw · 2h ago

Whoever is paying for your time should calculate how much time you’d save between the different products. The actual product price comparison isn’t as important as the impact on output quality and time taken. Could be $1000 a month and still pay for itself in a day, if it generated >$1000 extra value.

This might mean the $10/month is the best. Depends entirely on how it works for you.

(Caps obviously impact the total benefit so I agree there.)

zeroq · 1h ago

Just today I had yet another conversation about how BigCo doesn't give a damn about cost.

Just to give you one example - last BigCo I worked for had a schematic for new projects which resulted in... 2k EUR per month cloud cost for serving a single static html file.

At one point someone up top decided that kubes is the way to go and scrambled an impromptu schematic for new projects which could be simply described as a continental class dreadnought of a kubernetes cluster on AWS.

And it was signed off, and later followed like a scripture.

Couple stories lower we're having hard time arguing for 50 EUR budget for a weekly beer for the team, but the company is A fine with paying 2K EUR for a landing page.

dahcryn · 2h ago

Have I got bad news for you.... Microsoft announced imposing limits on "premium" models from next week. You get 300 "free" requests a month. If you use agent, you consume about 3-4 requests per action easily, I estimate to burn through 300 in about 3-5 working days.

Basically anything that isnt gpt4o is premium, and I find gpt4o near useless compared to Claude and Gemini in copilot.

maven29 · 2h ago

Enforcement of Copilot premium request limits moved to June 4, 2025 https://github.blog/changelog/2025-05-07-enforcement-of-copi...

pier25 · 2h ago

> I find gpt4o near useless compared to Claude and Gemini in copilot.

It's a hit and miss IMO.

I like it for C#/dotnet but completely useless for the rest of the stuff I do (mostly web frontend).

I'm not sure about my usage but if I hit those premium limits I'm probably going to cancel Copilot.

debian3 · 1h ago

The default unlimited model is now gpt 4.1 https://github.blog/changelog/2025-05-08-openai-gpt-4-1-is-n...

tkzed49 · 3h ago

I'll add on to this: I don't really use agent modes a lot. In an existing codebase, they waste a lot of my time for mixed results. Maybe Claude Code is so much better at this that it enables a different paradigm of AI editing—but I'd need easy, cheap access to try it.

warp · 3h ago

You don't need a max subscription to use Claude Code. By default it uses your API credits, and I guess I'm not a heavy AI user yet (for my hobby projects), but I haven't spent more than $5/month on Claude Code the past few months.

F7F7F7 · 3h ago

I burned $30 in Claude Code in just under an hour. I was equally frustrated and impressed. So much so I ended up a $200 MAX subscriber.

hombre_fatal · 2h ago

The money starts adding up fast as your context fills up since it's resending the whole accumulated context back through the api every time.

They're good about telling you how full your context is, and you can use /compact to shrink it down to the essentials.

But for those of us who aren't Mr. MoneyBags like you all, keeping an eye on context size is key to keeping costs low.

logankeenan · 1h ago

I’ve been wanting to try Claude Code. What makes it such a difference maker compared to existing AI tools?

koakuma-chan · 3h ago

The problem with it is that it uses a 30k~ token system prompt (albeit "cached"), and very quickly the usage goes up to a few million. I can easily spend over $10 a day.

EnPissant · 3h ago

I spent $5 in 10 minutes when I tried it.

christophilus · 3h ago

For me, it was $10 in 2 hours. That’s super cheap if it saves me significant time. Jury’s out on that, though.

koakuma-chan · 3h ago

> but I'd need easy, cheap access to try it.

You can try it for cheap with the normal pay-as-you-go way.

Aurornis · 1h ago

> The problem is that this is $100/mo with limits

Limits are a given on any plan. It would be too easy for a vibe coder to hammer away 8 hours a day for 20 days a week if there was nothing stopping them.

The real question is whether this is a better value than pay as you go for some people.

htrp · 1h ago

> 8 hours a day for 20 days a week

Your vibe coders are on a different dimension than mine.

cye131 · 3h ago

I'm curious whether anyone's actually using Claude code successfully. I tried it on release and found it negative value for tasks other than spinning up generic web projects. For existing codebases of even a moderate size, it burns through cash to write code that is always slightly wrong and requires more tuning than writing it myself.

singhrac · 1h ago

Here's a very small piece of I code I generated quickly (i.e. <5 min) for a small task (I generated some data and wanted to check the best way to compress it):

https://gist.github.com/rachtsingh/e3d2e2b495d631b736d24b56e...

Is it correct? Sort of; I don't trust the duration benchmark because benchmarking is hard, but the size should be approximately right. It gave me a pretty clear answer to the question I had and did it quickly. I could have done it myself but it would have taken me longer to type it out.

I don't use it in large codebases (all agentic tools for me choke quickly), but part of our skillset is taking large problems and breaking them into smaller testable ones, and I give that to the agents. It's not frequent (~1/wk).

ramoz · 3h ago

Yes. For small apps, as well distributed systems.

You have to puppeteer it and build a meta context/tasking management system. I spend a lot of time setting Claude code up for success. I usually start with Gemini for creating context, development plans, and project tasking outlines (I can feed large portions of codebase to Gemini and rely on its strategy). I’ve even put entire library docsites in my repos for Claude code to use - but today they announced web search.

They also have todos built in which make the above even more powerful.

The end result is insane productivity - I think the only metric I have is something like 15-20k lines of code for a recent distributed processing system from scratch over 5 days.

meesles · 2h ago

Is that final number really that crazy? With a well defined goal, you can put out 5-8K per day by writing code the old fashioned way. Also would love to see the code, since in my experience (I use Cursor as a daily driver), AI bloats code by 50% or more with unnecessary comments and whitespace especially when making full classes/files.

> I spend a lot of time setting Claude code up for success.

Normally I wouldn't post this because it's not constructive, but this piece stuck out to me and had me wondering if it's worth the trade-off. Not to mention programmers have spent decades fighting against LoC as a metric, so let's not start using it now!

dttze · 1h ago

You'll never see the code. They will just say how amazingly awesome it is, how it will fundamentally alter how coding is done, etc... and then nothing. Then if you look into who posts it, they work in some AI related startup and aren't even a coder.

infecto · 38m ago

Nobody is writing 5k consistently on a daily basis. Sure if it’s a bunch of boiler scaffolding maybe.

I daily drive cursor and I have rules to limit comments. I get comments on complex lines and that’s it.

maccard · 1h ago

5k likes of code a day is 10 lines of code a minute solidly for 8 hours straight. Whatever way you cut that with white space, bracket alignment, that’s a pretty serious amount of code to chunk out.

coverj · 1h ago

are people really committing 5k lines a day without AI assistance even once a month?

I don't think I've ever done this or worked with anyone who had this type of output.

bcrosby95 · 29m ago

It depends upon how well mapped out the problem is in your head. If it's an unfamiliar domain, no way.

_bin_ · 1h ago

I'd be really interested in seeing the source for this, if it's an open-source project, along with the prompts and some examples. Or other source/prompt examples you know of.

A lot of people seem to have these magic incantations that somehow make LLMs work really well, at the level marketing and investor hype says they do. However, I rarely see that in the real world. I'm not saying this is true for you, but absent vaguely replicable examples that aren't just basic webshit, I find it super hard to believe they're actually this capable.

broof · 2h ago

Can you share more about what you mean by a meta context/tasking management system? I’m always curious when I see people who have happily spent large amounts on api tokens.

thegeomaster · 2h ago

Absolutely stellar for 0-to-1-oriented frontend-related tasks, less so but still quite useful for isolated features in backends. For larger changes or smaller changes in large/more interconnected codebases, refactors, test-run-fix-loops, and similar, it has mostly provided negative value for me unfortunately. I keep wondering if it's a me problem. It would probably do much better if I wrote very lengthy prompts to micromanage little details, but I've found that to be a surprisingly draining activity, so I prefer to give it a shot with a more generic prompt and either let it run or give up, depending on which direction it takes.

ed · 2h ago

Yes. It costs me a few bucks per feature, which is an absolute no-brainer.

If you don't like what it suggests, undo the changes, tweak your prompt and start over. Don't chat with it to fix problems. It gets confused.

esha_manideep · 2h ago

Claude's limits are so vague - its not clear if buying Claude Max is cheaper than just using the API. Has anyone benchmarked this?

varispeed · 1h ago

Sounds like they are great fans of Numberwang.

pier25 · 2h ago

$200/month?

Do people really get that much value from these tools?

I use Github's Copilot for $10 and I'm somewhat happy for what I get... but paying 10x or 20x that just seems insane.

lkbm · 1h ago

If your employer spends $20k a month on you (salary + everything else), $200 a month breaks even at around a 1% boost in productivity.

pier25 · 1h ago

Maybe if you're working in FAANG...

0x6c6f6c · 1h ago

Lots of jobs where employers pay that much per head, not just FAANG. Honestly FAANG is probably spending double that for senior+ level engineers.

vel0city · 54m ago

If you get an employer match on 401k/HSA, the employer pays full healthcare premium, employer sponsored life insurance benefits, unemployment insurance, employer covered disability, payroll taxes, and all the other software costs, it wouldn't even take $200k in salary to cost $20k/mo. Someone could be making like $150k and still cost the company that much.

lucyjojo · 36m ago

gentle reminder that the majority of developers do not live in the united states.

median salary for a japanese dev is ~$60k. same range for europe (swiss at ~100k, italy at ~30k for the extremes). then you go down.

Russia ~$37,000 Brazil ~$31,500 Nigeria ~$6,000 Morocco ~$11,800 Indonesia ~$13,500 and india ~$30k usd

(asked chatgpt for these numbers down there, JP and EU numbers are mostly correct though as I have first hand experience).

vel0city · 17m ago

Sure, but ~$150k isn't exactly FAANG US salaries for an experienced software dev. That's my point. Lots of people forget how much extra many employers pay for a salaried employee on top of just the take home salary. Labor is expensive in the US.

I imagine a lot of people saw $20k/mo and thought the salary clearly had to be $200k+.

conradkay · 1h ago

Average US salary for SWE is 10-12k/month. Fully-loaded cost (what they spend) is 1.5-2x salary so that's not an unrealistic number

pier25 · 28m ago

So you're arguing about the top 10-20% earners in the US?

Also the world is much bigger than the US.

vel0city · 12m ago

The point is you don't have to have FAANG salaries to hit $20k/mo in cost to your employer.

Tons of software developer jobs in the US for non-FAANG tier or unicorn startup companies are >$100k and easily hit $120-150k.

Also the fourth quintile mean was like $120k in the US in 2022. So you'd be in the top 30% of earners making that kind of money, not the top 10%.

https://taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/household-income-quin...

abetaha · 3h ago

I wonder how successful this pricing model ($100-$200 a month with limits) is going to be. It is very hard to justify, when other tooling in the ~$20/month range offers unlimited usage, and comparable quality.

jsheard · 2h ago

Is any of the ~$20/month with unlimited usage tooling actually profitable though? It goes without saying that if all else is equal then the product sold at a greater loss will be more popular, but that only works until the vendor runs out of money to light on fire.

turnsout · 1h ago

Cursor keeps raising money… I for one personally enjoy burning all those VC dollars. Consider it a very tiny version of wealth redistribution.

slrainka · 3h ago

Agent mode without rails is like a boat without a rudder.

What worked for me was coming up with an extremely opinionated way to develop an application and then generating instructions (mini milestones) by combining it with the requirements.

These instructions end up being very explicit in the sequence of things it should do (write the tests first), how the code should be written and where to place it etc. So the output ended up being very similar regardless of the coding agent being used.

F7F7F7 · 3h ago

I've tried every variation of this very thing. Even managed to build a quick and dirty ticketing system that I could assign to the LLM of my choosing. WITH context. Talking Graph Codebase's diagrams, mappings, tree structure of every possibility, simple documentation, complex documentation, a bunch of OSS to do this very thing automatically etcetcetc.

In the codebase I've tried modularity via monorepo, or faux microservices with local apis, monoliths filled with hooks and all the other centralized tricks in the book. Down to the very very simple. Whatever I could do to bring down the context window needed.

Eventually.....your return diminish. And any time you saved is gone.

And by the time you've burned up a context window and you're ready to get out. Now you're expeciting it to output a concise artifact to carry you to the next chat so you don't have to spend more context getting that thread up to speed.

Inevitably the context window and the LLMs eagerness to touch shit that it's not supposed (the likelihood of which increases with context) always gets in the way.

Anything with any kind of complexity ends up in a game of too much bloat or the LLM removing pieces that kill other pieces that it wasn't aware about.

/VENT

slrainka · 2h ago

So, relying on a large context can be tricky. Instead I’ve tried to get to a ER model quickly. And from there build modules that don’t have tight dependencies.

Using Gemini 2.5 for generating instructions

This is the guide I use

https://github.com/bluedevilx/ai-driven-development/blob/mai...

ghuntley · 3h ago

the new Claude code “max plan” would last me all of [1] 5mins… I don’t get why people are excited about this. High powered tools aren’t cheap and aren’t for the consumer…

[1] https://www.youtube.com/live/khr-cIc7zjc?si=oI9Fj33JBeDlQEYG

iLoveOncall · 3h ago

If that's the case you should stop using it, because there's no way you see any ROI when you spend that much to just do some coding stuff.

It would be cheaper to your company to literally pay your salary while you do nothing.

postalrat · 3h ago

I'd love to see your math.

pclmulqdq · 3h ago

It's pretty simple: that usage in 5 min is probably at least $10 worth of API credits in that time (maybe $100).

A year has 2000 working hours, which is 24000 5-minute intervals. That means the company spending at least $240,000 on the Claude API (conservatively). So they would be better off having $100-200k you do nothing and hiring someone competent for that $240k.

F7F7F7 · 2h ago

Claude Max is less than a 1/2 percentage point of a Jr. Devs average salary. If you can't make that work then....

No comments yet

999900000999 · 1h ago

Worth it, but I’m chilling until the next major model release.

It still double downs on non working solutions

light_hue_1 · 2h ago

This isn't flat pricing. It's exactly the same API credits but you prepay for the month and lose anything you don't use.

Whether it turns out to be cheaper depends on your usage.

I thought Claude Code was absurdly expensive and not at all more capable than something like chatgpt combined with copilot.

dham · 2h ago

Both Anthropic and OpenAI don't have Linux desktop clients (to use MCP), so yea I'll skip.

turnsout · 1h ago

Claude Code runs in the terminal

varispeed · 1h ago

They could make $1000 a month version that runs on tape.

justanotheratom · 3h ago

I am sure this is worth every dime, but my workflow is so used to Cursor now (cursor rules, model choice, tab complete, to be specific), that I can't be bothered to try this out.

s17n · 3h ago

If you're using Cursor with Claude it's gonna be pretty much the same thing. Personally I use Claude Code because I hate the Cursor interface but if you like it I don't think you're missing much.

justanotheratom · 3h ago

I don't enjoy the interface as such, rather the workflows that it enables.

jbellis · 3h ago

One of my problems developing Brokk (AI coding for large codebases, https://brokk.ai) is that everyone is used to Cursor-style pricing of $20ish a month, but Brokk is designed around long-form prompts, it's a lot closer to a leash for Claude Code than it is to a Cursor or a Copilot, and the bill is a lot closer to CC too. (But of course Brokk is vendor neutral; you can absolutely mix o3 with GP2.5 with S3.7.)

So maybe Anthropic setting this precedent will solve my problem!

infecto · 34m ago

Agree with the other commenter. I have seen at least 2 other posts today where you plug your project.

ghuntley · 3h ago

nah, there are low powered tools and there’s high powered tools. If people want $20/month happy meal toys in business that business will get left behind. Ignore the consumer market, make Bugatti’s instead - https://ghuntley.com/redlining

ps - catchup for social zoom beers?

jbellis · 3h ago

you're right about the context limits

i pinged what i think is the right ghuntley on linkedin, rizzler looks like the next feature i'm building for brokk :)

ghuntley · 3h ago

This is me - speak soon. https://www.linkedin.com/in/geoffreyhuntley

owebmaster · 3h ago

> Please don't use HN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I_am_tiberius · 3h ago

Do you still need a phone number to register with claude?

Void: Open-source Cursor alternative (github.com)

Fui: C library for interacting with the framebuffer in a TTY context (github.com)

Reservoir Sampling (samwho.dev)

From: Steve Jobs. "Great idea, thank you." (blog.hayman.net)

Progress toward fusion energy gain as measured against the Lawson criteria (fusionenergybase.com)

Phoenician culture spread mainly through cultural exchange (mpg.de)

Notes on rolling out Cursor and Claude Code (ghiculescu.substack.com)

Gorilla study reveals complex pros and cons of friendship (sciencedaily.com)

Podfox: First Container-Aware Browser (val.packett.cool)

How the US Built 5k Ships in WWII (construction-physics.com)

When Abandoned Mines Collapse (practical.engineering)

Show HN: Using eBPF to see through encryption without a proxy (github.com)

Stability by Design (potetm.com)

How to start a school with your friends (prigoose.substack.com)

First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV (cnn.com)

Mathematical Problem Solving (cip.ifi.lmu.de)

Show HN: OpenRouter Model Price Comparison (compare-openrouter-models.pages.dev)

Newsreels from the UCLA Film and Television Archive (newsreels.net)

Gender characteristics of service robots can influence customer decisions (psu.edu)

Block Diffusion: Interpolating Autoregressive and Diffusion Language Models (m-arriola.com)

Static as a Server (overreacted.io)

The Rise and Fall of the Visual Telegraph (2017) (parisianfields.com)

A flat pricing subscription for Claude Code (support.anthropic.com)

Ciro (YC S22) is hiring a software engineer to build AI agents for sales (ycombinator.com)

Prepare your apps for Google Play's 16 KB page size compatibility requirement (android-developers.googleblog.com)

A Brief History of Cursor's Tab-Completion (coplay.dev)

Egyptologist uncovers hidden messages on Paris’s iconic obelisk (news.artnet.com)

How Obama’s BlackBerry got secured (2013) (electrospaces.net)

Show HN: Req Update Check (github.com)

Ask HN: What are good high-information density UIs (screenshots, apps, sites)?

AI focused on brain regions recreates what you're looking at (2024) (newscientist.com)

Shape and topology morphing of closed surfaces integrating origami and kirigami (science.org)

My stackoverflow question was closed so here's a blog post about CoreWCF (richardcocks.github.io)

How to harden GitHub Actions (wiz.io)

The second birth of JMW Turner (newstatesman.com)

Using Coalton to implement a quantum compiler (2022) (coalton-lang.github.io)

Why do LLMs have emergent properties? (johndcook.com)

My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth (gatesnotes.com)

Google to back three new nuclear projects (esgtoday.com)

Mass spectrometry method identifies pathogens within minutes instead of days (phys.org)

Passing Messages (thedailywtf.com)

DNA is maybe 60-750MB of data (dynomight.net)

Implement Your Language Twice (futhark-lang.org)

Using NASA’s SMAP satellite to detect L-band interference (radioandnukes.substack.com)

Will protein design tools solve the snake antivenom shortage? (owlposting.com)

IPinfo started offering free unlimited country-level geolocation and ASN details (ipinfo.io)

Implementing State Machines in PostgreSQL (2017) (felixge.de)

Heat stress mitigation by trees and shelters at bus stops (sciencedirect.com)

Show HN: Kit – open-source toolkit for building AI devtools (kit.cased.com)

2.5D Rendering on PlayDate (ligeiagames.com)

A flat pricing subscription for Claude Code

Comments (78)