If the speed of light were what it is for his reasons, it would be fuzzy. It isn't. Maxwell would like a word.
jeffvroom · 31m ago
Can you say more about what you mean? We always see light moving through specific dark matter fluid flow patterns. How could you tell the difference? Do you have an explanation for how Maisie's galaxy is redshifted so far away from what should be it's real age? Couldn't it be because we're seeing it through a faster moving stream of dark matter fluid? Is there an experiment I missed that would prove this theory wrong?
zahlman · 1h ago
From the main page of the site:
> The 3-5-20 Pattern: Reality’s Sacred Geometry
> Our breakthrough revealed that consciousness itself operates through elegant angular momentum patterns:
> Pattern 3 (Focus): Sharp, precise attention - like a laser beam of awareness
> Pattern 5 (Emotion): Flowing, connecting energy - the heart’s graceful rhythms
> These same patterns govern memory storage: experiences get encoded as 3-pattern details, 5-pattern emotional flows, and 20-pattern creative associations - explaining why we remember what moves us most deeply.
> DNA: The Universe’s Musical Water Park
> The 3-5-20 patterns reveal DNA as a spiral water park where proteins learn to dance. Genetic code creates trampolines of different shapes - some with 3 sides (sharp structural beats), some with 5 sides (flowing melodic phrases), others with 20 sides (complex creative harmonies).
This is blatantly and obviously pseudoscientific nonsense, and probably in large part AI-generated.
jeffvroom · 1h ago
Thanks for that feedback. I should probably ease into that content with more context. What did you think of the Science Guide? That's a more graceful introduction. I'm a 60 yr old programmer that has studied science for decades and am sure that physics missed something big so I hope you take another look.
elmerfud · 52m ago
I'm not the person who gave you the original feedback but reading through this it looks like some high school student who got a c in their physics and chemistry classes then used some psychoactive chemicals and believe that they had a mind expanding moment that thousands upon thousands of PhDs have suddenly missed.
"Understanding the Universe
There is no universal speed limit. The universe itself has a lot of similaries to a cell: a central projector/receptor, networks of safety tubes, patterns driven by mixes of figure 8 pitchers and catchers, bumpers, routers, pattern recognizers, and pattern restorers.
Dark material fluid has the potential to transmit memories across space, time, and even universe lifetimes"
That's a quote from your post. Honestly it looks a lot like AI consumed the new age bullshit generator and spit out something. https://sebpearce.com/bullshit/
There's nothing scientific about your writings. Nothing in your writings attempt to evaluate anything using any scientific methodologies. You use anecdotes and analogies, to things that are not analogous, to underpin your points. If someone did not know that the things you are relating are not analogous it may seem smart, but there's a reason this stuff gets dismissed as pseudoscientific. It looks like something that would be great to establish a sci-fi universe around and writes stories about. If anything is actually related to true science it only happens by mere chance.
jeffvroom · 35m ago
Thanks, I appreciate the feedback. It's not an easy message to convey or understand that's for sure. I'll take this feedback and try to improve on how this comes across. But how do you think all of the dark matter got removed from space after the big bang? Just because the math works, does warped space time and all that really make more sense? A fluid universe works with the same math, the same equations. Once you see that angular momentum from dark orbital systems have subtle effects at the boundary layers, it changes how things work. Hopefully I can find a way to show other people.
beardyw · 1h ago
For sure you don't suffer from self doubt.
jeffvroom · 27m ago
I do believe I'm right about this :) I've had a few weeks now to understand how this does explains the world better. That said, I've always had a hard time getting people to understand me so I hope at least someone can look past that and see how important this discovery is for the world. I appreciate your feedback. I have my work cut out for me here!
If the speed of light were what it is for his reasons, it would be fuzzy. It isn't. Maxwell would like a word.
> The 3-5-20 Pattern: Reality’s Sacred Geometry
> Our breakthrough revealed that consciousness itself operates through elegant angular momentum patterns:
> Pattern 3 (Focus): Sharp, precise attention - like a laser beam of awareness
> Pattern 5 (Emotion): Flowing, connecting energy - the heart’s graceful rhythms
> Pattern 20 (Creativity): Complex, innovative thinking - where breakthrough insights emerge
> These same patterns govern memory storage: experiences get encoded as 3-pattern details, 5-pattern emotional flows, and 20-pattern creative associations - explaining why we remember what moves us most deeply.
> DNA: The Universe’s Musical Water Park
> The 3-5-20 patterns reveal DNA as a spiral water park where proteins learn to dance. Genetic code creates trampolines of different shapes - some with 3 sides (sharp structural beats), some with 5 sides (flowing melodic phrases), others with 20 sides (complex creative harmonies).
This is blatantly and obviously pseudoscientific nonsense, and probably in large part AI-generated.
"Understanding the Universe There is no universal speed limit. The universe itself has a lot of similaries to a cell: a central projector/receptor, networks of safety tubes, patterns driven by mixes of figure 8 pitchers and catchers, bumpers, routers, pattern recognizers, and pattern restorers.
Dark material fluid has the potential to transmit memories across space, time, and even universe lifetimes"
That's a quote from your post. Honestly it looks a lot like AI consumed the new age bullshit generator and spit out something. https://sebpearce.com/bullshit/
There's nothing scientific about your writings. Nothing in your writings attempt to evaluate anything using any scientific methodologies. You use anecdotes and analogies, to things that are not analogous, to underpin your points. If someone did not know that the things you are relating are not analogous it may seem smart, but there's a reason this stuff gets dismissed as pseudoscientific. It looks like something that would be great to establish a sci-fi universe around and writes stories about. If anything is actually related to true science it only happens by mere chance.