I guess they need more funding and grants. A human does not need to ingest the entire Internet in order to plagiarize what was read. A human does not need a prompt in order to take action. Two humans can have a conversation that does not collapse immediately.
These people apparently need coaching on the most basic activities. How to solve this in the future? Perhaps women should refuse to procreate with "AI" researchers, who prefer machines anyway.
nextaccountic · 8m ago
Humans spend years training 24/7 before they can do anything useful. People train even during their sleep, in their dreams. And on top of that, we transmit culture to other people, which accelerate their training.
And that's with the huge "pre-training" data stored in our genetic code (comprising billions of years and evolution), alongside epigenetic inheritance.
ergonaught · 18m ago
Do you have any grasp of how much stuff your brain ingested to enable you to post this?
No, clearly.
Workaccount2 · 8m ago
Don't worry, they're all just stochastic parrots[1]
> This led the court to conclude that the “[a]uthors’ complaint is no different than it would be if they complained that training schoolchildren to write well would result in an explosion of competing works.”
scarmig · 29m ago
Your "ideas" are just regurgitations of things you read off the internet; you have no coherent theory of "creativity" beyond some ineffable reference to the sanctity of the human soul.
acedTrex · 27m ago
So true, its well known that "ideas" came around at the same time as the advent of the modern internet.
MangoToupe · 1h ago
How does one distinguish between what some call "hallucinations" and creativity?
jmsdnns · 1h ago
hallucinations is when we dont like it, creativity is when we do
fusionadvocate · 55m ago
You rather have a hallucinated driver or a creative driver coming your way?
jerf · 33m ago
The article is about image generators. Image generators specifically work by starting with noise and then refining the noise into an image. That's not how driving software works and this is not a relevant point.
fusionadvocate · 13m ago
Sorry, I failed to follow your reasoning. My comment had nothing to do with "driving software", it addressed the parent post by posing the question a different way.
MangoToupe · 41m ago
I'd rather have someone I can hold liable for their decisions, tbh.
yard2010 · 51m ago
Hell, I don't want any AI driver coming my way.
add-sub-mul-div · 1h ago
Temperature settings will not get you to David Lynch.
77pt77 · 49m ago
Correct. Increasing the temperature will probably result in something that makes more sense that Lynch's output.
MangoToupe · 41m ago
Yes, because the thing we look for in art is... coherence?
> For example, large language models and other AI systems also appear to display creativity, but they don’t harness locality and equivariance.
"Next token" prediction is (primary) local, in the sense that the early layers are largely concerned with grammatical coherence, not semantics, and if you shifted the text input context window by a few paragraphs, it would adjust the output accordingly.
It's not _mathematically_ the same, but i do think the mechanics are similar.
josefritzishere · 1h ago
You can always spot AI marketing. There is this consistent misuse of words like "creativity" which implies intent. AI does not have intent or self-awareness. AI has no concept of objective reality. The word "hallucinations" has the same problem. With no concept of objective reality there is no understanding of the real and the unreal. To quote a popular article, it's bullshitting. All the LLM and algorithmic refinements only improve it's bullshitting. https://www.psypost.org/scholars-ai-isnt-hallucinating-its-b...
hopelite · 53m ago
I am leery of such a claim not just being attention bias, because although it surely is mostly AI gobbledygook, it all looks just like the marketing gobbledygook of pre-AI, ignoring any obvious AI tells.
I think you may just be noticing sloppy attention to detail, i.e., not proofing, relying on AI that is not quite ready, similar to devs just committing AI slop without review.
I suspect someone is going to train a marketing specialized AI at some point that is focused on that specific type of promotional manipulative language of marketing. But, frankly, I don’t see it being long loved either though, because I see marketing being totally nullified by AI. You don’t need marketing when humans are no longer making decisions/buying.
I guess they need more funding and grants. A human does not need to ingest the entire Internet in order to plagiarize what was read. A human does not need a prompt in order to take action. Two humans can have a conversation that does not collapse immediately.
These people apparently need coaching on the most basic activities. How to solve this in the future? Perhaps women should refuse to procreate with "AI" researchers, who prefer machines anyway.
And that's with the huge "pre-training" data stored in our genetic code (comprising billions of years and evolution), alongside epigenetic inheritance.
No, clearly.
[1]https://ai.vixra.org/pdf/2506.0065v1.pdf
> This led the court to conclude that the “[a]uthors’ complaint is no different than it would be if they complained that training schoolchildren to write well would result in an explosion of competing works.”
"Next token" prediction is (primary) local, in the sense that the early layers are largely concerned with grammatical coherence, not semantics, and if you shifted the text input context window by a few paragraphs, it would adjust the output accordingly.
It's not _mathematically_ the same, but i do think the mechanics are similar.
I think you may just be noticing sloppy attention to detail, i.e., not proofing, relying on AI that is not quite ready, similar to devs just committing AI slop without review.
I suspect someone is going to train a marketing specialized AI at some point that is focused on that specific type of promotional manipulative language of marketing. But, frankly, I don’t see it being long loved either though, because I see marketing being totally nullified by AI. You don’t need marketing when humans are no longer making decisions/buying.