To be clear, it's only time tracking for invoicing. Not for productivity measurement, or for recording specific tasks, or taskboards or bugs. I suggest you say that on your webpage. (Do you recommend or integrate with any time-tracker for the purposes I mention? If not can you recommend one you'll integrate with? Personally I like Todoist).
Wow - that really hurt my feelings. It is specifically for recording on specific tasks and ... erhmm. .everything you said. You can check out the various feature there https://nureti.com/features/
smcin · 16h ago
No it doesn't do I everything I listed: doesn't do subtasks. Or sub-sub-tasks. That's why I specifically told you that.
Constructive feedback that would greatly increase its capabilities and your addressable market hurt your feelings? You solicited feedback, I'm the only person who gave you any, then you say that. What would you expect us to say to you? (There are already many existing time-trackers for invoicing that "don't suck", why not explain how yours improves over them? Is it ease-of-use? cross-platform? dashaboards? management features?)
Your homepage only talks about tracking time and logging time (by broad categories, nothing about subcategories or specific tasks or bugs).
Based on what your homepage shows, Todoist does more. Then I checked your feature page, and yes Todoist does more. Just to triple-check I wasn't being unfair to you, I signed up for your trial, and checked and indeed no it doesn't do subtasks. Or sub-sub-tasks. Or most other features at: https://www.todoist.com/task-management
Your tool looks good for people who are okay with only a few broad toplevel categories to track, and don't need to manually manage a hierarchy of tasks, subtasks and their dependencies.
It does the role stuff that Todoist free tier doesn't offer. They're in separate market niches.
https://www.todoist.com/
https://hn.algolia.com/?q=Todoist
Constructive feedback that would greatly increase its capabilities and your addressable market hurt your feelings? You solicited feedback, I'm the only person who gave you any, then you say that. What would you expect us to say to you? (There are already many existing time-trackers for invoicing that "don't suck", why not explain how yours improves over them? Is it ease-of-use? cross-platform? dashaboards? management features?)
Your homepage only talks about tracking time and logging time (by broad categories, nothing about subcategories or specific tasks or bugs). Based on what your homepage shows, Todoist does more. Then I checked your feature page, and yes Todoist does more. Just to triple-check I wasn't being unfair to you, I signed up for your trial, and checked and indeed no it doesn't do subtasks. Or sub-sub-tasks. Or most other features at: https://www.todoist.com/task-management
Your tool looks good for people who are okay with only a few broad toplevel categories to track, and don't need to manually manage a hierarchy of tasks, subtasks and their dependencies. It does the role stuff that Todoist free tier doesn't offer. They're in separate market niches.