Best Buy is selling a $400 "digital Ethernet" cable for "cleaner, clearer sound"

10 34679 10 5/28/2025, 4:08:34 PM
"Enjoy cleaner, clearer, more naturally beautiful sound from Ethernet-equipped audio/video components with this high-quality AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet cable. Meticulously designed for exceptional performance and outstanding value, Cinnamon RJ/E features Solid 1.25% Silver conductors that have been Direction-Controlled to efficiently dissipate high-frequency noise. High-density Polyethylene insulation further minimizes distortion and preserves dynamics. Optimize a wide range of audio streaming devices with AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet cable."

Discuss but PLEASE do not buy.

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/audioquest-cinnamon-rj-e-39-3-digital-ethernet-cable-with-rj45-to-rj45-connectors-black-with-red-stripes/5577904.p?skuId=5577904

Comments (10)

yonatan8070 · 4h ago
I sometimes wonder how the people behind these things feel about themselves? Do they feel bad about essentially stealing but suppress it when they see how much money they can make? Or do they just have no conscience?

The same goes for any kinds of scammers, AI spam bot owners, etc.

simondanerd · 1d ago
Is this not the advantage of an optical sound cable? A 10 foot cable is $8 on Amazon.

1.25% silver doesn't qualify as "solid" in my mind either.

drweevil · 1d ago
"digital Ethernet cable" is straight out of the Department of Redundancy Department. And even 100% silver wouldn't change the sound one lick. It is transmitting digital data. 4.6 out of 5 on the reviews tho. The positive reviews are classic cases of confirmation bias: if I paid that much I expect it will be better! Only two reviewers didn't appreciate being separated from their money for no discernible improvement.
tocs3 · 1d ago
The Ethernet cable would presumably be sending digital data. As long as the environment that the cable is being used in is reasonable, the quality of the signal will not be improved because of better conductivity in the cable.
Kon-Peki · 1d ago
> optical sound cable

You’re probably talking about TosLink cables (what else could you be talking about?).

They have the bandwidth to carry two channels of uncompressed digital audio. Which is what they were designed for.

If you’re using one to carry 5.1 or 7.1 audio from your TV to your soundbar, it’s compressed. An HDMI cable can carry that uncompressed. And so could an Ethernet cable.

brudgers · 1d ago
1. The Audiophile market caters to people who spend money to signal the importance sound plays in their lives. An expensive cable provides value in that regard.

2. I know this is not the motivation, but sending analog audio signals over twisted pair network cables works really well. This is often referred to as “audio over Ethernet” and these cables might be technically better for that (and they might not).

3.People with significant wealth don’t see $500 as a lot of money.

4. An audio installer with cost plus for materials makes more money installing it and avoids “aren’t these cables better?” questions from discerning customers whose discernment is driven by advertising, marketing, and online enthusiast forums.

Or to put it way $500 is not a lot to spend on something that makes you happy, even if it’s not what would make us happy.

Good luck.

34679 · 22h ago
To point 4-“aren’t these cables better?”

Any honest installer would give the honest answer: "No."

brudgers · 21h ago
If they are what the client wants, they are better because the client decides what has value.

Part of what wealth pays for is other people’s agreement with their opinions. Telling them they are foolish to believe what they want to believe is not a hill worth dying on.

That’s pretty much true in general. But you do you.

the_hoser · 1d ago
A fool and his money.
Bender · 1d ago
Discuss but PLEASE do not buy.

Well, you know and I know but Monster cable was created in 1979 and somehow they and others like them still exist so I guess we will be seeing a lot more digital ethernet cables.