> I fully support systems that prevent harmful content.
"'I never thought leopards would eat MY face,' sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party."
afandian · 4h ago
I got into a situation a couple of years ago with Google over a few dollars when I terminated my paid GSuite account. It was impossible to contact them to settle the balance. They kept sending emails from a Google-branded department that was clearly outsourced. The process was literally Kafka-esque.
Didn’t manage it in the end. Ended up going to collections who happily listened and cancelled the debt.
I was a happy paying email customer of many years.
I now am sworn never to enter any kind of relationship with Google, and encourage to do the same.
Fade_Dance · 4h ago
Currently going through this with Reddit. Their appeal process is to submit a form which may or may not be processed, and there is zero feedback for the user. Common advice is to submit the form daily.
I have submitted it 200 times over the past year. I know that it probably just goes into a black void, but it is apparently the official review process, and I am 100% sure there were no rule violations (I was flagged for responding to new threads too quickly and reposting the same educational link a few times because I was answering the same sort of question). It's cruel really. Somehow they made something even worse than the Google approach. Presumably tens of thousands of users are wasting time every single day doing this.
Like others have said, most tech companies are like this and it's unacceptable, even if users are the product.
ryandrake · 1h ago
Why would you keep trying 200 times to use a site that hates and ignores you? Just find something else to do online.
If HN suddenly banned my account out of nowhere for no discernible reason, I’m not going to E-mail dang 200 times. I’d just find some other site to read. Life is too short to do business with companies that despise you.
Fade_Dance · 1h ago
Well I have a text file with 5 boiler plate messages. When I boot the screens up every day, I open a new tab and 7 seconds later a new appeal has been submitted.
I do admit that there is a slight prick of annoyance at the start of every day because of this, but I'm well into sunk cost fallacy into the realm of morbid curiosity and flagellation.
Part of the reason is because I manage an account that has a major position in Reddit equity options, so I have to read the name everyday regardless. Indeed I was banned because my option trading advice was too quick and frequent (man, that sub needs some serious basic theory help)... Of course, you can be assured that their horrible customer goodwill may possibly come up in future conversations when I mention the position.
I thought about just emailing IR, but I've actually talked to someone else in a similar position who has contacted IR and they did nothing either.
I was a major contributor to an open source Reddit alternative after the API lockdown, but unfortunately after 2 years I just didn't think that it was going anywhere big and backed out of that, so been there done that to some degree, and that was a good 500 plus hours of investment (although it was net positive - it was fun to grow an old school internet community even though it is never going to compete with Reddit).
The main issue is that they ban all accounts that they can fingerprint to other banned accounts, and I have an account in hibernation that is 15 years old and truly has a huge portion of my life contained in it. It's much like OP and losing a Google account. I think that is the main reason why I grovel to the uncaring corporate shell that encompasses the community that I once help to build when I came over in the great digg migration. I should probably just export the data and vectorize it into an LLM, and just close the book on the few old friends that I'd like to reconnect with someday.
Speaking of Digg, I hear they're rebooting, and things are going well behind the scenes...
nerdsniper · 5h ago
I encrypt so much of the stuff I upload to google drive or email. In my case, more because my filetypes and contents tend to trigger malware detection (even though literally none of it is malware or even security research).
Stories like this are why I do it. I don’t know when something is going to get flagged - NSFW or otherwise. I really should de-google and I mean to. Buts its a daunting project for the email address I’ve had since 2004 (my email is now old enough to drink in USA).
beeflet · 3h ago
I was in the same position. here's what I did:
1) Got my own domain
2) Subscribed to an email service that lets you use your own domain (for example fastmail)
3) Forwarded all of my email from my gmail account to my new email/domain, and use my new email/domain in all correspondence.
4) Made a separate google account for every google service I used. For example, I made a separate account from my gmail for google play, google cloud and youtube.
It's a bit of work but this allowed me to slowly ease myself out of gmail, and derisk my account activity. Even if fastmail screws up, I can always point my domain at another email provider like protonmail.
Oh, also:
5) Use syncthing for file storage. It's cheap and I can back up TB worth of stuff from decades ago.
crossroadsguy · 1h ago
I was lucky enough to have had my (first - pretty nice little common username) Gmail account summarily culled towards the early years of my email usage. I was young and I hadn't used the email anywhere where it could get critical - I don't think I had anything critical in life at that time. Besides, my country hadn't moved to emails for personal communications and interactions - it never did, it just teleported into instant messaging.
I was never given a reason. I tried to reach out and, of course, we know how it ends (even then). The thing is, I didn't even use it for anything other than sending emails to friends who were starting in other colleges and kind of just using emails for the sake of using emails. It was the new tool for me. Except one - the teenage me was in long and cosy exchanges with a nice someone many states and thousands of kilometres over talking about Jane Austen and Tolstoy and their works that we both read and loved and what not and also sharing with each other things I now definitely would not call poetry. That still feels like a loss - even after some two odd decades. The silliest thing - I didn't remember the email. Those were the good old days of r1d1clulux_paynthr_56789_b0mb@rediffmail.com. We never asked or revealed each other's names. Those were days like that when you didn't have to worry about whether you were talking to a cat or a fish.
I started using other email services (Yahoo, Hotmail - for a long time those were my main emails) and when I started working I got a domain and moved to a paid email host.
This also taught me a lesson about using free services. Hell, even when using a paid service this can happen. Apple is an example. You feel Google does it, oh boy oh boy, Apple knows how to do the true stonewalling! When you are on the phone with a real human being and that human being stonewalls you and their company (Apple) doesn't even allow that human being to help you, or escalate, or move up in the support chain, you feel that is real something - esp. if you are in a country where consumer laws are less than jokes! Anyway, so that taught me to be ready, to have backups (not just as in data, but as in options), and fallbacks.
I think everyone should experience things like this, but kinda early in life :)
PS. Naah, OP's case isn't like mine. But then people like me (and maybe OP and maybe you) allowed and enabled (still do) Googles and Apples of this world to be this big that they can just do it and get away with it and it doesn't even matter even in countries where consumer laws have real functioning teeth. So that's there.
nicomt · 2h ago
Google suspended my payments account a few months ago without even notifying me. I never received a reason for the suspension, but I suspect it's related to a failed game refund from Stadia, as I see a refund error in my payment notifications. Dealing with Google Support has been a Kafkaesque loop where I have to explain the same thing over and over, only to get the same scripted instructions that take me nowhere. After this dance, they finally say they will "escalate" the issue and then close the case. At this point, I've given up and am in the process of de-googling my life.
_rm · 4h ago
Good public warning.
But still, "unzip random NSFW content onto Google Drive" doesn't sound risk free does it
josephcsible · 4h ago
It doesn't sound risk free, but in a reasonable world, the risk would just be accidentally downloading a virus or something and having to wipe your PC, not being unpersoned for life by Google.
msgodel · 2h ago
The name "Google drive" implies it's like a hardware disk: unaware of even the filesystem, much less the files, stored on it. Most users likely think of it that way and don't notice until they accidentally trigger things.
_rm · 1h ago
The word Google in that name implies that it is Google's
ryandrake · 1h ago
People have been saying “The Cloud is just someone else’s computer” for decades. We still apparently have not fully internalized this fact. It’s only your data if it’s on your metal, in your physical possession.
andrewinardeer · 4h ago
Not surprised.
Google clearly states CSAM is forbidden on their platform.
The user stored CSAM on Google Drive. Regardless whether it is for academic research or not - which in this case, it wasn't. It was for training a model.
Do you really think Google wants to be on the front page of the newspaper saying it allows users to store CSAM?
The user has been caught off guard and that's on them.
And yes, you're not safe either if you store CSAM on Google. Who in their right mind thinks they are?
Edit: Grammar
like_any_other · 5m ago
CSAM is the author's baseless speculation, but I could find no evidence suggesting NudeNet contains any. That it's hosted on GitHub, all its files are on archive.org, and is a widely used data-set 6 years old by now, all indicate that it doesn't contain CSAM.
In general, when a company does something hostile and unreasonable, let's not invent out of thin air facts to excuse their behavior, shall we? Especially since their stonewalling is deliberate.
isaacremuant · 5h ago
I know. They've been doing this for ages. It's very hard to convince people something like this can happen to them until it does.
"'I never thought leopards would eat MY face,' sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party."
Didn’t manage it in the end. Ended up going to collections who happily listened and cancelled the debt.
I was a happy paying email customer of many years.
I now am sworn never to enter any kind of relationship with Google, and encourage to do the same.
I have submitted it 200 times over the past year. I know that it probably just goes into a black void, but it is apparently the official review process, and I am 100% sure there were no rule violations (I was flagged for responding to new threads too quickly and reposting the same educational link a few times because I was answering the same sort of question). It's cruel really. Somehow they made something even worse than the Google approach. Presumably tens of thousands of users are wasting time every single day doing this.
Like others have said, most tech companies are like this and it's unacceptable, even if users are the product.
If HN suddenly banned my account out of nowhere for no discernible reason, I’m not going to E-mail dang 200 times. I’d just find some other site to read. Life is too short to do business with companies that despise you.
I do admit that there is a slight prick of annoyance at the start of every day because of this, but I'm well into sunk cost fallacy into the realm of morbid curiosity and flagellation.
Part of the reason is because I manage an account that has a major position in Reddit equity options, so I have to read the name everyday regardless. Indeed I was banned because my option trading advice was too quick and frequent (man, that sub needs some serious basic theory help)... Of course, you can be assured that their horrible customer goodwill may possibly come up in future conversations when I mention the position.
I thought about just emailing IR, but I've actually talked to someone else in a similar position who has contacted IR and they did nothing either.
I was a major contributor to an open source Reddit alternative after the API lockdown, but unfortunately after 2 years I just didn't think that it was going anywhere big and backed out of that, so been there done that to some degree, and that was a good 500 plus hours of investment (although it was net positive - it was fun to grow an old school internet community even though it is never going to compete with Reddit).
The main issue is that they ban all accounts that they can fingerprint to other banned accounts, and I have an account in hibernation that is 15 years old and truly has a huge portion of my life contained in it. It's much like OP and losing a Google account. I think that is the main reason why I grovel to the uncaring corporate shell that encompasses the community that I once help to build when I came over in the great digg migration. I should probably just export the data and vectorize it into an LLM, and just close the book on the few old friends that I'd like to reconnect with someday.
Speaking of Digg, I hear they're rebooting, and things are going well behind the scenes...
Stories like this are why I do it. I don’t know when something is going to get flagged - NSFW or otherwise. I really should de-google and I mean to. Buts its a daunting project for the email address I’ve had since 2004 (my email is now old enough to drink in USA).
1) Got my own domain
2) Subscribed to an email service that lets you use your own domain (for example fastmail)
3) Forwarded all of my email from my gmail account to my new email/domain, and use my new email/domain in all correspondence.
4) Made a separate google account for every google service I used. For example, I made a separate account from my gmail for google play, google cloud and youtube.
It's a bit of work but this allowed me to slowly ease myself out of gmail, and derisk my account activity. Even if fastmail screws up, I can always point my domain at another email provider like protonmail.
Oh, also:
5) Use syncthing for file storage. It's cheap and I can back up TB worth of stuff from decades ago.
I was never given a reason. I tried to reach out and, of course, we know how it ends (even then). The thing is, I didn't even use it for anything other than sending emails to friends who were starting in other colleges and kind of just using emails for the sake of using emails. It was the new tool for me. Except one - the teenage me was in long and cosy exchanges with a nice someone many states and thousands of kilometres over talking about Jane Austen and Tolstoy and their works that we both read and loved and what not and also sharing with each other things I now definitely would not call poetry. That still feels like a loss - even after some two odd decades. The silliest thing - I didn't remember the email. Those were the good old days of r1d1clulux_paynthr_56789_b0mb@rediffmail.com. We never asked or revealed each other's names. Those were days like that when you didn't have to worry about whether you were talking to a cat or a fish.
I started using other email services (Yahoo, Hotmail - for a long time those were my main emails) and when I started working I got a domain and moved to a paid email host.
This also taught me a lesson about using free services. Hell, even when using a paid service this can happen. Apple is an example. You feel Google does it, oh boy oh boy, Apple knows how to do the true stonewalling! When you are on the phone with a real human being and that human being stonewalls you and their company (Apple) doesn't even allow that human being to help you, or escalate, or move up in the support chain, you feel that is real something - esp. if you are in a country where consumer laws are less than jokes! Anyway, so that taught me to be ready, to have backups (not just as in data, but as in options), and fallbacks.
I think everyone should experience things like this, but kinda early in life :)
PS. Naah, OP's case isn't like mine. But then people like me (and maybe OP and maybe you) allowed and enabled (still do) Googles and Apples of this world to be this big that they can just do it and get away with it and it doesn't even matter even in countries where consumer laws have real functioning teeth. So that's there.
But still, "unzip random NSFW content onto Google Drive" doesn't sound risk free does it
Google clearly states CSAM is forbidden on their platform.
The user stored CSAM on Google Drive. Regardless whether it is for academic research or not - which in this case, it wasn't. It was for training a model.
Do you really think Google wants to be on the front page of the newspaper saying it allows users to store CSAM?
The user has been caught off guard and that's on them.
And yes, you're not safe either if you store CSAM on Google. Who in their right mind thinks they are?
Edit: Grammar
In general, when a company does something hostile and unreasonable, let's not invent out of thin air facts to excuse their behavior, shall we? Especially since their stonewalling is deliberate.