Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
440 points by stephenheron 4d ago 616 comments
Ask HN: Best codebases to study to learn software design?
107 points by pixelworm 6d ago 92 comments
Ask HN: Is there a temp phone number like temp email?
10 points by piratesAndSons 3d ago 11 comments
House Republicans want to dox Wikipedia editors over 'bias' complaints
39 anigbrowl 20 8/30/2025, 1:30:55 AM techdirt.com ↗
Specifically it is the ideology of Capitalism, representative democracy, the rule of law, etc... basically the ideology of the enlightenment.
This misuse of Liberal is easy to track the etymology. The colloquial usage of "liberal" does sound like an opposite of conservative, it's basically a synonym for "lenient". But colloquial usage is often totally incorrect in certain contexts, like this one.
People who use "liberal" as an opposite of conservative are just bad at type theory.
You could just as well say he still agrees with your point about reality comporting more with a progressive understanding of ethics, while at the same time parodying Fox News for incoherently making spurious charges of "liberalism" at every turn.
Additionally, passionate invocation of "facts", "reality" and "objectively true" should be red flags for any discussion.
This election cycle it’s that “liberal” cities are overrun with criminal migrants and the only way to save the children is sending in the military. Constitution be damned.
https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/
You can see this in edit history or discussions on various articles. For example whether something gets labeled as a conspiracy theory or not is a matter of opinion, but the coordinated groups of activist editors and their bots and various powers always win, and their bias is in one direction.
That said, I don’t think it’s appropriate for the government to interfere in speech, except by encouraging and supporting a diversity of ideas.