A career is a pie-eating contest and the prize for winning is more pie

60 mooreds 66 9/7/2025, 11:06:11 AM jason.energy ↗

Comments (66)

latexr · 3h ago
The whole post is the same short thought repeated over and over.

My recommendation to the author is to read and reflect on “Atomic blog posts”¹, by Mike Crittenden. I’ll reproduce it here in its entirety:

> There’s no law that says a blog post needs more than one idea or more than one sentence.

¹ https://critter.blog/2021/01/06/atomic-blog-posts/

mrcsharp · 3h ago
I love that and strongly agree with it. I should probably start practicing that.
MathMonkeyMan · 3h ago
How many times did I read "a pie-eating contest where the prize for winning is more pie" before clicking away?

1. The hacker news title.

2. The tab title.

3. The image at the top left.

4. The text section to the right of the image.

5. The second sentence.

6. Different crop of the same image from before, but now below the second sentence.

I know that this isn't a curious comment, but holy shit dude.

stavros · 3h ago
The post was a contest and the prize was more post.
kevindamm · 3h ago
Maybe they wanted you to see how much pie you are willing to eat.
xnx · 1h ago
"Maybe if I sacrifice enough of my body to the grinder, they'll let me crank the handle someday" https://bsky.app/profile/dasharez0ne.bsky.social/post/3ly75c...
DebtDeflation · 3h ago
People forget that in the long history of human civilization, the idea of working as an employee of a big company only goes back about 150 years, the idea of white collar office work in that context only goes back about 75 years, and the idea of a "career" (as opposed to just doing the same job forever) is even newer.
terminalshort · 3h ago
People who point this out tend to forget that's because for most of that long history the alternative options were pretty much: 1. be born to the right parents, 2. peasant farm laborer. We're not going back to that, so might as well forget it for purposes of analysis.
wolvesechoes · 2h ago
> We're not going back to that

I think future holds couple of surprises for you.

Balgair · 3h ago
Aside: Bret Devereaux has a series on the remarkably similar lives of a peasant farm laborers throughout time and space here:

https://acoup.blog/2025/07/11/collections-life-work-death-an...

TLDR: Holy shit, so much infant mortality, penicillin and vaccination are god-sends, holy shit. Also, your fields were all over the place and everything extra gets eaten up by taxes from Big Man.

fulafel · 1h ago
Things really went downhill when people started farming. Wars, disease, hard labor, etc.
01HNNWZ0MV43FF · 3h ago
I long for the romantic life of rolling into town, offering fair work for fair wages, having a fling with one or two maidens, and then moving on

It might have only been possible for a small handful of people who were, unlike me, strapping, young, men, and fictional

Rover222 · 1h ago
I don’t know, kinda feel like this is the modern digital nomad life.
rpdillon · 1h ago
In the 1920s poem, Desiderata, I was always surprised that Max makes a reference to career:

Keep interested in your own career, however humble;

it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.

Exercise caution in your business affairs;

for the world is full of trickery.

But let this not blind you to what virtue there is;

many persons strive for high ideals;

and everywhere life is full of heroism.

beardyw · 2h ago
You need to read Samuel Pepys. In 1662 he definitely had a white collar job. He describes his office politics and his accumulation of wealth and his working his way up the organisation.
jajko · 3h ago
Shhh, or you are going to ruin some lives of folks who have excellent corporate careers in some lets say questionable companies, and very little achievement to show in their actual lives.
tossandthrow · 4h ago
There are a couple of reasons to do well on the job: it might be a joyful activity, it leads to better opportunities, it teaches a lesson that can be used starting something, or it ensures employment.

If none of these things have appeal, then one should carefully think about being in that job.

strken · 3h ago
There's something that makes me sad about the thought of an engineer, sitting at a desk, thinking "I can't fix the fifteen second frobnizzle page load time because otherwise they'll make me fix the performance of everything."

That's not how work is meant to be. In this metaphor, one should like pie. If the pie eating contest is offering free pie then it's perfectly legitimate to walk in, eat a normal amount of pie, accept your prize, and be happy with it.

tossandthrow · 2h ago
If you derive personal satisfaction from the acitivity of fixing these performance issues, then I don't see the issue?
exe34 · 2h ago
I don't see the problem with more work as long as it displaces other work that I can now either not do or do at a later time. I'm not going to do more work in the same time just because I have a talent.
simianwords · 4h ago
The most important reason to do a good job is empathy for your customers. Everything else is secondary.
horsawlarway · 3h ago
Personally, I find this attitude pretty derivative.

Why should a worker feel empathy for a customer if that empathy doesn't have any meaningful impact on them?

It's a good thing to say to a founder of a company, such as the owner of a small business.

It's a pretty useless thing to say to an overworked support staff... Answering more calls or putting out more fires very rarely benefits that role. Hell, I've seen support staff get told attempting to help a customer too long is a negative, and they're doing a bad job. Even in the best cases, I've often seen drive met with a management that just makes that effort the new baseline... "Great job, guys! Our ticket wait time is down 30% , now let's keep it there!"

So sure - have empathy for your customers. Don't have it blindly at bad jobs.

alistairSH · 3h ago
The most important reason to do a good job is the slightly higher likelihood of being able to feed and house your family.
stavros · 4h ago
This blog post is interesting in that it could be a tweet. The title is the whole thing.
mooreds · 4h ago
I think it did start out as a tweet. Here it is in 2022: https://x.com/jlengstorf/status/1483803682206466049

I also think that he digs in a bit more:

> Whether or not that’s a good thing depends on whether or not you enjoy the work.

But I agree, he could have does a lot more analysis.

The metaphor is striking, though.

leoc · 3h ago
I'm a bit surprised that people are complaining so much about this. I have read many a blog post which stretched one or two fairly obvious thoughts out at great length. By comparison this post is just a few sentences and it manages to say something sensible, if not stunningly insightful, about the title. (The banner art and so on is a bit extra, yes, but ... meh.) The thing most worth complaining about here is that the title isn't original: 'academia', 'law school' and 'making partner' are all older and more common substitutions for 'a career'. 'Law school' seems to be particularly popular and appropriate, since (IIUC; IANAL) the best-performing US law-school students are rewarded with the coveted opportunity to move from cramming law for exams to working 996 pressure-cooker jobs as juniors at BigLaw firms.
api · 4h ago
A good proportion of nonfiction books could be their blurbs. This is pretty common. We use too many words in a lot of contexts.
latexr · 3h ago
For those books, I realised that a much better use of time is to search YouTube for a talk by the author. They’ll explain everything that’s remotely interesting about the book’s thesis. Everything else in the book is typically anecdote after anecdote.
iammjm · 4h ago
Nobody would pay 10-20$ for a blurb. So let’s somehow make it to about 200 pages and we’re good.
api · 2h ago
If we were rational we would pay more for the blurb if it’s insight was original and high quality.
stavros · 3h ago
I hate this so much, I made a website against it: https://www.thesummarist.net
api · 2h ago
Thanks. That’s in my bookmark list now.
stavros · 2h ago
I'm glad you like it, I'm not updating it much these days, since nobody reads it, but I can take requests!
Havoc · 4h ago
Vibes seem off with some of the stuff doing well on hn today
q3k · 4h ago
You call it bad vibes, I call it people gaining class consciousness.
radialstub · 3h ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIw3INYRNmY

Sorry for lazy comment, but I had to

simianwords · 3h ago
Class consciousness mfs when they reach Next Stage Of Humanity tm but they are forced to pick berries in a farm
kannanvijayan · 3h ago
Status quo megafaunas when they're watching the robots farm berries while they starve.
Herring · 3h ago
Flag it. Flag it immediately.
terminalshort · 3h ago
People who use the term "class consciousness" are almost entirely people in the upper middle class who paid too much attention in school and not enough in the real world and are capable of deluding themselves into thinking their lives of luxury are actually something to be complained about.
Sharlin · 4h ago
Can’t really disagree with TFA.
paulcole · 4h ago
No, Company Bad, Boss Bad, Marketing Bad, AI Bad, Engineer Good is the vibe here.
DrewADesign · 3h ago
Worker Leverage Bad, Company Criticism Bad, Questioning Management Bad, Deliberate Equality Bad, Regulation Bad, Labor Expenses Bad, AI Good, Max Productivity Good, Business Good, Leadership Good, Shareholder Good is just as frequently the vibe here. Whichever one you disagree with most looks more prevalent.
shoo · 4h ago
engineer unsure if pie good or bad. sample more pie.
kevindamm · 3h ago
"ooh I think I have a way to improve pie production"
felixgallo · 3h ago
That sound you just heard was sixteen disruptive AI blockchain pie subscription services submitting applications to YC
xyzelement · 3h ago
Life is like that. The reward of a successful marriage is staying married.
collinmcnulty · 3h ago
The prize for winning is two people who both want you to eat their particular pie and you say you’ll eat for the one who pays you the most.
tolerance · 3h ago
Evidently this post is excellent in its brevity, redundancy and effectiveness in getting its point across.

And flawed for the same reasons, if not for my suspicion that this is a fragment of a greater point that the author is trying to make that can be further contextualized against the posts adjacent to this one, except that there is no date on this individual post nor are they any on the main “blog” index that would allow me to orientate myself thereby.

So I’m loving the mixed reactions that this is getting. And I reckon that the author could elaborate better through either a change of format (like a book) or UX revisions.

mooreds · 4h ago
Another, less colorful, way to put this is "don't put anything on your resume you don't want to do more of".

I know folks who have taken old technologies (perl, ASP.NET) off their resume so that they don't get approached by employers looking to hire for technologies they don't want to work in.

pjmlp · 4h ago
Yes, one such example here.

A golden rule is to fit your resume into one or two pages max.

Have the private copy as big as one wants, however take the effort to sell oneself to the actual position.

HR is looking for reasons to throw away resumes out from the pile, anything that makes their work harder will contribute for that.

doctorhandshake · 4h ago
Yeah my rule when considering taking on a freelance project is ‘do I want to become an expert in this, and do I thus want my phone to ring for this for the next 2 years?’
billy99k · 3h ago
Or you get to stay employed. If you don't like it, start a company or become a contractor/consultant. I've only been contracting for the last decade.

A company just gave me more work. It nearly doubled my income.

singpolyma3 · 2h ago
A career is a pie eating contest where the prize for winning is money you invest so you never have to work again.
demarq · 4h ago
This is just a phrase repeated 3 times in a page?
vlan0 · 4h ago
"The reward for good work is more work."

- timm chiusano

sigio · 3h ago
And the reward for a job badly done... is less work.
bitwize · 2h ago
I'm reminded of the episode of the Strange Planet television series in which a "flying machine comfort supervisor" (flight attendant) is called before Being Resources, where she is promoted to comfort supervisor supervisor. "Our data show you handled your responsibilities well. Your reward is more responsibility."
arisAlexis · 3h ago
I don't understand. Pie = money. Yeah and we go around the sun?
satisfice · 4h ago
This is the sort of thing that sounds like insight to a creative 12 year-old who swears he will never settle for a “desk job.”

A career is actually a contest where the prize is money that you can buy things with, including pie.

javcasas · 3h ago
Only if you learn to play the game by the actual rules, not if you play the game by what they tell you the rules are.
jajko · 3h ago
Surprisingly little actual long term quality of life, happiness or life satisfaction can be bought with money, any money. They are important if you properly don't have them but as soon as you leave that category they are at best secondary.

So people boasting about their 'successful careers' are pretty boring empty bunch, rather tell me how you spend your evenings, weekends or vacations, how good parent you are (aka how much you suffer for your kids and don't outsource hard but important parts to grandparents or nannies), what you do for your community and so on.

xvilka · 3h ago
Long term QoL definitely needs money: healthy food, means to exercise, enough time and freedom for work-life balance, travel, and so on. So yes, money are necessary for it. But the amount has a certain cap, let's say somewhere between $1-30M depending on the place where you live and the size of your family.
terminalshort · 3h ago
The idea that being a good parent requires extensive suffering and work is the worst that our current society has created.
smikhanov · 3h ago
More like 16 year old, but the rest is spot on.
redwood · 3h ago
"If you want to get something done, give it to the busy person"