> If companies claim to “take your security seriously”, then SSO should be available as a feature that is either:
>> - part of the core product, or
>> - an optional paid extra for a reasonable delta, or
attached to a price tier, but with a reasonably small gap between the non-SSO tier and SSO tiers.
>> - Many vendors charge 2x, 3x, or 4x the base product pricing for access to SSO, which disincentivizes its use and encourages poor security practices.
----
I dont follow the logic. Food and shelter are a human rights, but that doesnt mean you can walk into a restaurant and insist that food be served at $dream price, or walk into Home Depot and take premium plywood and pay basic/entry level price.
rufus_foreman · 1h ago
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and (checks notes) Single Sign On.
No comments yet
It's not really an "ask", FedGov through NIST / CISA is requiring it.
>> - part of the core product, or
>> - an optional paid extra for a reasonable delta, or attached to a price tier, but with a reasonably small gap between the non-SSO tier and SSO tiers.
>> - Many vendors charge 2x, 3x, or 4x the base product pricing for access to SSO, which disincentivizes its use and encourages poor security practices.
----
I dont follow the logic. Food and shelter are a human rights, but that doesnt mean you can walk into a restaurant and insist that food be served at $dream price, or walk into Home Depot and take premium plywood and pay basic/entry level price.