Your lips were like wine,
If you'll pardon the simile;
The music was fine
If a bit Rudolph Friml-y.
(The Wienerschnitzel Waltz)
galaxyLogic · 19h ago
Since this is about language and similes, what about "You can't compare apples and oranges"? People say that frequently, but why in particular is that so?
I think you can compare any one thing to any other one thing. You can discuss what are their common features and what features they have that are not shared.
So it seems to me "Can't compare apples and oranges" is often used just as a polemic device, trying to attack your opponents by claiming what they are saying cannot be said.
Night_Thastus · 19h ago
I think it's more you shouldn't judge apples based on the criteria of how good it is at being an orange, and vice-versa.
Kind of like how you don't judge a fish on how well it climbs trees.
The Czechs say that you can't compare the sky (or the heavens, depending on how you want to translate it) and bagpipes.
singleshot_ · 16h ago
Moreover if you chuck an apple and an orange in a mass spectrometer you will find that they are more or less exactly the same. I believe someone won an igNobel prize for that observation.
karolinepauls · 17h ago
It's always been like "you cannot compare values of different units" to me. Maybe we should start saying "you cannot compare kilograms to metres".
singleshot_ · 16h ago
A kilogram is more than enough gasoline to move my car a meter.
karolinepauls · 2h ago
`kg of fuel per metre` is division, not comparison. You can divide different units by each other. It isn't guaranteed to always make sense but it's very useful.
AnimalMuppet · 19h ago
It seems to me that "can't compare apples and oranges" is trying to say that you're using apple criteria to try to judge oranges. It's not that you can't compare apples and oranges, but you have to use fruit criteria to do so, not apple criteria or orange criteria.
So, to stop using similes: You can compare CPUs. You can compare memory chips. You can also compare memory chips and CPUs on, say, power consumption. But you can't compare memory chips to CPUs in terms of MIPS. If you try, then it's appropriate to accuse you of comparing apples to oranges.
galaxyLogic · 7h ago
Good point. If things exist in different "ontological categories" trying to evaluate which of them is "better" makes little sense.
But apples and oranges are both good food, so we can compare how much calories you get forjm them, or vitamins etc.
righthand · 17h ago
Probably because the word “contrast” has been subsumed by the word “compare”.
From thefreedictionary.com for contrast:
> contrast
to examine differences; a striking exhibition of unlikeness: The contrast of styles intensified the impact of the paintings.
> Not to be confused with:
compare – to liken; relate; examine similarities: compare the shades of blue
You can’t compare apples to oranges unless you talk about their similarities (round objects, fruits, etc). Similarities don’t offer any new value to the conversation of apples and oranges. You can “contrast” apples and oranges (red, orange, better, worse). Which adds new analysis to the topic.
I think you can compare any one thing to any other one thing. You can discuss what are their common features and what features they have that are not shared.
So it seems to me "Can't compare apples and oranges" is often used just as a polemic device, trying to attack your opponents by claiming what they are saying cannot be said.
Kind of like how you don't judge a fish on how well it climbs trees.
So, to stop using similes: You can compare CPUs. You can compare memory chips. You can also compare memory chips and CPUs on, say, power consumption. But you can't compare memory chips to CPUs in terms of MIPS. If you try, then it's appropriate to accuse you of comparing apples to oranges.
But apples and oranges are both good food, so we can compare how much calories you get forjm them, or vitamins etc.
From thefreedictionary.com for contrast:
> contrast to examine differences; a striking exhibition of unlikeness: The contrast of styles intensified the impact of the paintings.
> Not to be confused with: compare – to liken; relate; examine similarities: compare the shades of blue
You can’t compare apples to oranges unless you talk about their similarities (round objects, fruits, etc). Similarities don’t offer any new value to the conversation of apples and oranges. You can “contrast” apples and oranges (red, orange, better, worse). Which adds new analysis to the topic.