It took me a while to find, but here is a BestOf Reddit comment from 16 years ago where a user Saydrah discusses communicating with Cuttlefish for an hour with her fingers https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/s/TBfh8u9MGX
“Well that,” said Polynesia, brushing some crumbs off the corner of the table with her left foot—“that is what you call powers of observation—noticing the small things about birds and animals: the way they walk and move their heads and flip their wings; the way they sniff the air and twitch their whiskers and wiggle their tails. You have to notice all those little things if you want to learn animal language. For you see, lots of the animals hardly talk at all with their tongues; they use their breath or their tails or their feet instead.
Dr Dolittle’s Parrot explaining how to learn “animal language”. Voyages of Dr. Dolittle , chapter 8
nfgrep · 4h ago
Interesting, The Mountain in The Sea is becoming a reality.
I see, so they share that with there main predator...
Italians
go_elmo · 14h ago
Super cool! Imo kind of makes sense - think these sort of problems (communication) are general across actors and science seems to confirm some cases (between plants / funghi, cuddlefish, mamals..). Were not as unique as we think & thats freeing.
asmodeuslucifer · 3h ago
I watched one checking me over when I was skin diving in about 3 feet of water. It was hard to see, because it had a rippling pattern of light and dark lines on its back that matched the sunlight through the waves.
enneff · 14h ago
This is so cool to see. When I used to do a lot of SCUBA diving I would sometimes have long staring competitions with cuttlefish. Of course it’s impossible to know for sure, but I always got the sense there was a lot going on behind those eyes.
damnitbuilds · 13h ago
So if I drum my fingers on the table, and my colleague gets visibly annoyed by it, these researchers think I am "talking" to him ?
542354234235 · 11h ago
If I flip you off for being annoying, I would definitely be communicating something as specific as if I’d used words.
rad_gruchalski · 11h ago
Yes, you’ll communicate your emotional immaturity. With words we might be able to solve the problem.
stronglikedan · 9h ago
There's nothing immature about flipping people off. In fact, it's quite healthy. Sometimes words fail, but flipping off never does.
7thaccount · 11h ago
Don't forget about sign language.
rad_gruchalski · 11h ago
Sign language is a language for people who have serious problems communicating with spoken language. So yes, definitely don’t forget about words communicated using sign language.
timschmidt · 10h ago
The signing community disagrees strongly with this take, as sign is an expressive artform in it's own right. Hearing folks can as easily appreciate a talented and expressive signer as a vocalist. And it's possible to express things through sign which are impossible to express with speech.
thaumasiotes · 8h ago
Heather Dale wrote a song about Gawain and the Green Knight, and produced a video in which a deaf storyteller tells the story while the song plays. (I don't think the story is an exact match to the song, but I assume it's fairly close.)
The storyteller uses some very impressive body language; it's great to see. It made me wonder if this is a particular strength of deaf storytelling, given that the audience has to be watching closely anyway.
99% of those people would not be interested in the artform if they or a loved one did not have a handicap.
Similarly, 99% of people will not appreciate an expressive signer as much as a vocalist.
That is just reality. I doesn't mean it is without value.
PaulDavisThe1st · 1h ago
"Spanish is a language used by people who have serious difficulties communicating in English"
"But look, there are tons of people who speak English but still use Spanish to communicate with others who only or mostly speak Spanish"
"99% of those people would not be interested in Spanish if they or a loved one did not have problems speaking English".
boothby · 7h ago
I take it you've never had a conversation on a dance floor, across a street busy with traffic, or without any risk of waking the baby (or your enemies, I guess), or behind somebody's (highly proximate) back.
Sign languages are for humans. Even those of us with sharp hearing can learn to take greater advantage of the bandwidth available to us.
karn97 · 7h ago
Most HN posters were bullied in schools for being weird werent they
jajko · 7h ago
Who was never bullied during school age, maybe home schooled kids?
fsckboy · 3h ago
sorry, but i was never bullied (US public school)
lucyv · 10h ago
The word "talk" doesn't appear anywhere in the article besides the title.
damnitbuilds · 10h ago
They grossly overstate what they have shown.
What they have actually shown - that cuttlefish react to another cuttlefish waving its tentacles - is clearly not showing that tentacle waving "serves as a communication system between cuttlefish.
NonHyloMorph · 7h ago
No that is precicsely communication, but nothing indicazes that is "talk". Communication is the "lower" phenomenon ghen talk/speech. Involuntary body processes communicate something in us sapiensapiens and we are sure tjat animals communicate. But do they talk... if we say "talk" ("sprechen") that entails the whole of what natural languages do and is quite different.
damnitbuilds · 4h ago
Again, reacting when an action is detected does not show communication.
asdajksah2123 · 4h ago
I think you're confused about what the communication is.
The communication isn't the waving in "reaction" (it's not clear it's simply a reaction, but let's assume it is) to the original wave, but the original wave itself.
And the fact that it's also triggered by videos indicates it's not just a mechanical reaction (like some of the research about how plants "communicate" is which are essentially mechanical responses to stimuli).
However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the communication is meaningful. It just shows that a means of communicating exists.
sethammons · 8h ago
How would you define communication between two entities? What threshold of data needs to be conveyed? Can communication be unidirectional?
bongodongobob · 8h ago
I think you grossly overstate your expertise in marine communication studies.
anotheryou · 13h ago
Of course that's communcation. "Talking" might be a bit overpromising, but definitely some comms. Don't nitpick, the core is true. :P eyeroll
damnitbuilds · 11h ago
This is supposed to be science, terminology matters:
They state that tentacle waving serves "as a communication system between cuttlefish."
Merely showing that a thing reacts to another thing doing something in a certain way is NOT showing the existence of a communication system between them.
Dylan16807 · 8h ago
Weird. I would say that idle finger drumming is of course not communication.
anotheryou · 8h ago
Well to be fair finger drumming can, but does not have to be purpuseful communication.
You can drum your fingers because you are bored, not to signal to the outside that you are bored. Strictly speaking me picking up on your boredness because you drum your fingers makes it communication anyways I think :).
A better example would be waving at someone, communicating "hello / look at me / I see you / here / I'm happy to see you / goodbye"
pixl97 · 25m ago
Reading through this thread you can see how many people on HN don't understand non-verbal communication (note anotheryou, this isn't directed at you, you seem to get it).
I do wonder if some of these people realize they may not be neurotypical, even if just slightly. A huge amount of human behaviors and communications are encoded how we move and how our face reacts. If for some reason you can't pick up on or interpret this, then human behavior can be quite confusing.
anotheryou · 8h ago
> Communication is the process of exchanging information between individuals through various means, such as speaking, writing, or using body language. It involves a sender conveying a message to a receiver, who then interprets and responds to that message.
(some ai said this, but I think AI should be perfect for defining common words :)
dfxm12 · 8h ago
I'm not going to speak for these researchers, but I will suggest you read up on the concept of scare quotes.
kozlovsky · 13h ago
> The exact meaning behind these arm signs remains unclear. The researchers observed them in various contexts – during mating, hunting, defensive situations, and sometimes spontaneously. This suggests the signs might serve multiple purposes depending on the situation.
Can these signs be an alphabet of some language?
A_D_E_P_T · 12h ago
Squid are no big deal, but people should really stop eating cuttlefish and large octopi. By all accounts -- and, by now, there are very many -- they seem highly intelligent and playful.
DangitBobby · 7h ago
I have recently added unintelligent people to my "can eat" list since an arbitrary intelligence level is the indicator of whether it's ok to eat something.
lukan · 9h ago
Pigs and birds are highly intelligent, too.
dinfinity · 10h ago
To be fair, though: pretty much all animals normally die of starvation (if they're lucky) or are eaten alive. Depending on how they end up on your plate their life and end of it might be far less harrowing than what they face naturally.
djtango · 9h ago
It's not clear to me whether dying by starvation is always worse than being eaten alive. Some modes of being alive are definitely horrifying but others would result in a fairly quick death...
thaumasiotes · 8h ago
> pretty much all animals normally die of starvation (if they're lucky) or are eaten alive
You don't have to be eaten alive. There are predators who will kill their prey before eating it. Cats are known for that.
psunavy03 · 8h ago
That's also why cats "play" with their prey. They're not being sadistic; they're tiring it out so they can safely make a killing bite, so they can safely eat it. When your food can bite back, it behooves you to kill it first, so it can't hurt you. Which matters when your ancestors (and potentially you if you're feral) were both predator and prey.
fsckboy · 3h ago
when you are being bitten to death, it is difficult to discern if you are being eaten by biting or just bitten by biting. this point goes to GP
magospietato · 11h ago
I had a beautifully presented octopus tentacle tapas on Menorca about a decade ago. I can't describe how exquisite the meat is when cooked well.
But boy, all those short YouTube docs about smart octos just came flooding back at the first bite.
Felt a lot like eating someone's dog, and I've steered clear since.
No comments yet
aeonik · 12h ago
If I donate my body to octopus stockfeed after I die (after organs are harvested for those in need obviously), does that give me a pass?
deepvibrations · 12h ago
Can I kill and eat your pets and/or the pets of your friends/family?
I will donate my body as stockfeed to those remaining pets that your family/friends have after I die. Does that give me a pass?
infecto · 11h ago
Lots of places still eat horses, dogs or other animals. I may make a decision to not eat those but I don’t judge folks that do.
deepvibrations · 10h ago
That's great for you. However, animals do not have a voice, despite being intelligent and feeling the same emotions as us.
I am sure if you saw somebody harming a mentally disabled person who could not communicate, you would try to stop them. In the same way, I don't see any harm in being a voice for the animals.
For all we know, in the future we may look back on modern animal agriculture/ factory farming in the same way as we look back on slavery now.
If I can reduce harm in the world to sentient beings at the cost of something tasting slightly different then I will do my best to go down that path personally.
infecto · 7h ago
I respect your intentions, but the leap you’re making, comparing animal farming to slavery or abuse of disabled people, relies on swapping out real-world complexity for clean moral hypotheticals. Humans have always lived in tension between empathy and necessity. Culture, environment, and biology shape our choices more than abstract equivalence does. If you choose to avoid harm, great. But turning that into a universal moral indictment flattens history, species difference, and the human condition. We’re animals too, and sometimes we forget how messy that is.
coddingtonbear · 11h ago
There’s a clear difference between deciding not to eat something for cultural reasons than deciding not to eat something because it’s an intelligent, thinking creature.
infecto · 10h ago
No it’s not, hence the conversation around it. I am glad you can draw that line clearly but don’t impose others to do the same.
DangitBobby · 7h ago
If you swapped out "slavery", "rape", or "murder" for a few choice words in this thread, you can see how ridiculous your statement is. The way we treat and even talk about animals is an incredible moral failure.
infecto · 7h ago
You’re making my point for me. Swapping out words to create new moral equivalencies is exactly what I find unproductive. Humans are animals, and we live with competing instincts: survival, empathy, culture, appetite. In the best of times, we have the luxury to weigh those things and make personal choices. But pretending there’s a clean, universal moral framework that everyone must follow, regardless of history, biology, or circumstance, feels more like ideology than ethics. I respect your choices, just don’t expect everyone else to inhabit your frame.
DangitBobby · 4m ago
You would find it unproductive since it makes your position obviously untenable. We use metaphors because they help short circuit whatever mental trappings you've managed to construct for yourself.
You're really just saying that it's not immoral enough for you to justify actually bothering to do anything about it, including even inconveniencing others with your opinion. I can pretty much guarantee you it was impolite for people to share their opinions against slavery back in the day, too.
infecto · 1m ago
I’m not dodging discomfort, I’m pointing out that morality isn’t just about drawing lines, it’s about understanding the context in which people live and make choices. You frame this as a binary: either one agrees with your comparison or they’re morally bankrupt. But that’s precisely why this conversation goes nowhere. I’m not defending factory farming, I’m pushing back on moral frameworks that flatten human behavior into easily judged categories. If you want lasting change, you have to start by recognizing that not everyone sees the world through the same lens, and that’s not always a failure of conscience.
Dylan16807 · 8h ago
The biggest impact when killing a pet is on the family, so that breaks the analogy really badly.
rad_gruchalski · 11h ago
But which pets do you mean. Pigs? Cows? Goats? A dog? A turtle?
pimlottc · 2h ago
Yes. You get to eat one.
MrBuddyCasino · 11h ago
Just embrace cannibalism.
Now you can eat what you want without having to resort to hypocritical cladistics that don't match reality.
rad_gruchalski · 11h ago
Watch out for prions. Stay safe.
afactcheck · 10h ago
Good advice. Fortunately for the aspiring cannibal, however, Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease is very rare with an estimated prevalence of 1 case per million people per year [1], and it's exposure to prions through the eating of infected meat that allows transmission this way rather than cannibalism specifically.
There's a popular belief that cannibalism can cause prion disease. However, this seems not to be the case with famous outbreaks such as Kuru being the result of many members of the community eating or being exposed to the brain tissue of already infected individuals [2]. Concern of transmission via eating meat of animals with a prion disease was the reason for European bans on British Beef in the 90s and 2000s [3].
If you're concerned about exposure to prion disease then good news! They are rare diseases and research suggests that most (87%) of the few cases that do occur are due to protein misfolding in the individual (spontaneous CJD) rather than genetics (familial CJD) or prion exposure (iatrogenic and variant CJD) [4].
On behalf of all of us cannibals, I'd like to express my sincere gratitude for this valuable contribution to our way of life.
jajko · 11h ago
Of course, but only if we talk about you dying now, via some pretty horrible death in well oiled industrial process, to make things at least a bit comparable.
justonceokay · 9h ago
I take it you’ve never played hide and seek with a chicken
CoopaTroopa · 10h ago
Cuttlefish confirmed Italians
dfedbeef · 8h ago
best comment
luotuoshangdui · 14h ago
Cuttlefish are incredibly intelligent.
CommenterPerson · 12h ago
This is why I turned vegetarian. Fish, Chickens, Cows, Goats and other creatures are sentient.
shakna · 11h ago
To drum a hollow drum, you probably meant sapient.
Sentience is a lower bar, and even most trees pass it. [0] Sentience, when boiled down, "just about" means capable of responding to pain. Nothing more. Sapience comes with the less easy to define intelligence of an individual.
Hollow drums are usually the best drums. If you fill them with stuff they don't resonate as well.
deepvibrations · 11h ago
Logically, it may make more sense to keep eating beef/some meat and instead give up dairy. Not only is it probably healthier, but the pain inflicted in the dairy industry is arguably worse per calorie than that of milk.
- Forced (artificial) insemination
- Calf separation (within 24hrs of birth, causes distress to mother too)
- Male calf fate (typically sold into veal or beef production, often under low-welfare conditions)
- Repeated pregnancy and high milking demands (3–4 pregnancies over ~4 years and are milked 2–3 times daily)
- Health problems (mastitis, lameness, metabolic disorders etc)
- Physical mutilations (dehorning/disbudding, tail docking and branding are routine)
- Early culling (Productive lifespan is ~5 years, yet natural lifespan ~20 years)
- Confinement and barren housing
- Transportation and slaughter
dghughes · 10h ago
And what do you think will happen if today all dairy cows were released to open fields? (I know)
deepvibrations · 10h ago
I don't consider it, as the reduction in dairy consumption will likely happen over many years and as demand dies out, farmers simply reduce their dairy herd appropriately and repurpose the land.
theoreticalmal · 10h ago
I’m cursious as to what would happen, other than more expensive milk and cheese
DyslexicAtheist · 7h ago
not when they're deep-fried they don't
hartjer · 10h ago
This is disappointing, I thought there would be a lot more cuddling involved
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxOTbnHzGrI
Dr Dolittle’s Parrot explaining how to learn “animal language”. Voyages of Dr. Dolittle , chapter 8
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/59808603-the-mountain-in...
The storyteller uses some very impressive body language; it's great to see. It made me wonder if this is a particular strength of deaf storytelling, given that the audience has to be watching closely anyway.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTtlPUNGs3Q
Similarly, 99% of people will not appreciate an expressive signer as much as a vocalist.
That is just reality. I doesn't mean it is without value.
"But look, there are tons of people who speak English but still use Spanish to communicate with others who only or mostly speak Spanish"
"99% of those people would not be interested in Spanish if they or a loved one did not have problems speaking English".
Sign languages are for humans. Even those of us with sharp hearing can learn to take greater advantage of the bandwidth available to us.
What they have actually shown - that cuttlefish react to another cuttlefish waving its tentacles - is clearly not showing that tentacle waving "serves as a communication system between cuttlefish.
The communication isn't the waving in "reaction" (it's not clear it's simply a reaction, but let's assume it is) to the original wave, but the original wave itself.
And the fact that it's also triggered by videos indicates it's not just a mechanical reaction (like some of the research about how plants "communicate" is which are essentially mechanical responses to stimuli).
However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the communication is meaningful. It just shows that a means of communicating exists.
They state that tentacle waving serves "as a communication system between cuttlefish."
Merely showing that a thing reacts to another thing doing something in a certain way is NOT showing the existence of a communication system between them.
You can drum your fingers because you are bored, not to signal to the outside that you are bored. Strictly speaking me picking up on your boredness because you drum your fingers makes it communication anyways I think :).
A better example would be waving at someone, communicating "hello / look at me / I see you / here / I'm happy to see you / goodbye"
I do wonder if some of these people realize they may not be neurotypical, even if just slightly. A huge amount of human behaviors and communications are encoded how we move and how our face reacts. If for some reason you can't pick up on or interpret this, then human behavior can be quite confusing.
(some ai said this, but I think AI should be perfect for defining common words :)
Can these signs be an alphabet of some language?
You don't have to be eaten alive. There are predators who will kill their prey before eating it. Cats are known for that.
But boy, all those short YouTube docs about smart octos just came flooding back at the first bite.
Felt a lot like eating someone's dog, and I've steered clear since.
No comments yet
I will donate my body as stockfeed to those remaining pets that your family/friends have after I die. Does that give me a pass?
For all we know, in the future we may look back on modern animal agriculture/ factory farming in the same way as we look back on slavery now.
If I can reduce harm in the world to sentient beings at the cost of something tasting slightly different then I will do my best to go down that path personally.
You're really just saying that it's not immoral enough for you to justify actually bothering to do anything about it, including even inconveniencing others with your opinion. I can pretty much guarantee you it was impolite for people to share their opinions against slavery back in the day, too.
Now you can eat what you want without having to resort to hypocritical cladistics that don't match reality.
There's a popular belief that cannibalism can cause prion disease. However, this seems not to be the case with famous outbreaks such as Kuru being the result of many members of the community eating or being exposed to the brain tissue of already infected individuals [2]. Concern of transmission via eating meat of animals with a prion disease was the reason for European bans on British Beef in the 90s and 2000s [3].
If you're concerned about exposure to prion disease then good news! They are rare diseases and research suggests that most (87%) of the few cases that do occur are due to protein misfolding in the individual (spontaneous CJD) rather than genetics (familial CJD) or prion exposure (iatrogenic and variant CJD) [4].
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20170704234755/https://www.ninds... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuru_(disease)#Transmission [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_spongiform_encephalopat... [4] https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fana.410430611
Sentience is a lower bar, and even most trees pass it. [0] Sentience, when boiled down, "just about" means capable of responding to pain. Nothing more. Sapience comes with the less easy to define intelligence of an individual.
[0] One of many, many papers in this debated topic: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1578
- Forced (artificial) insemination - Calf separation (within 24hrs of birth, causes distress to mother too) - Male calf fate (typically sold into veal or beef production, often under low-welfare conditions) - Repeated pregnancy and high milking demands (3–4 pregnancies over ~4 years and are milked 2–3 times daily) - Health problems (mastitis, lameness, metabolic disorders etc) - Physical mutilations (dehorning/disbudding, tail docking and branding are routine) - Early culling (Productive lifespan is ~5 years, yet natural lifespan ~20 years) - Confinement and barren housing - Transportation and slaughter