Wish I noticed before submitting, I would have just shared that instead. Oh well. Thanks.
JohnDeHope · 47m ago
As a Pasco county alumni, I think we should drop the people who want to drain the everglades off in the everglades and leave them in there until they gain an appreciation for the scenery.
ecocentrik · 19m ago
Do we really want to introduce more invasive species into the Everglades?
bdamm · 44m ago
Or until they become lunch?
dfltr · 35m ago
Until the scenery gains an appreciation for them, you might say.
ortusdux · 5m ago
Speaking of the uncanny feeling of shallow water, there are parts of the Florida keys where you can paddle a kayak a good half a mile from shore and still be in 2-4 ft of water. It's a great place to learn a new watersport as if you fall in you can just stand up.
Rendello · 3m ago
Leeches freak me out, I can't imagine swimming with (or falling on) the gators!
neilv · 20m ago
I've heard the theory that humor is actually a censor mechanism, to inhibit learning nonsense.
So, IIUC, if the censor identifies something nonsensical, it throws the amusement switch, to keep your brain from integrating the wrong thing.
While we might think that the presentations of fact in the article are informative, the humor-saturated prose could be a good way to cloud any thinking about the topic.
Does this mean it's OK to mention expanding the Florida Everglades? One could plan out a path of bulldozing, excavation, and flood fills, given an existing map of gerrymandering for national elections.
mrbluecoat · 3m ago
> 5x the size of JFK (the airport, not the person)
lol
inglor_cz · 29m ago
Once upon a time, draining wetlands was the only somewhat efficient way to reduce malaria. That made sense, given the drop in mortality. Lots of places in Italy, for example, are ex-swamps.
yesbut · 20m ago
no
aaronbwebber · 35m ago
betteridge's law of headlines still undefeated
Meph504 · 40m ago
what an odd clickbait type article, it goes over the history of people who previously wanted to do this. But mention there is no current effort to do so, and asking the question is irrelevant.
So, IIUC, if the censor identifies something nonsensical, it throws the amusement switch, to keep your brain from integrating the wrong thing.
While we might think that the presentations of fact in the article are informative, the humor-saturated prose could be a good way to cloud any thinking about the topic.
Does this mean it's OK to mention expanding the Florida Everglades? One could plan out a path of bulldozing, excavation, and flood fills, given an existing map of gerrymandering for national elections.
lol