The Baby Paradox in Haskell

3 fanf2 1 8/31/2025, 11:42:03 AM blog.jle.im ↗

Comments (1)

barrister · 2h ago
It is implied, or goes without saying, that baby loves baby too. A love song wouldn't explicitly state this because it would appear vain and come off as a slight. Thus, the actual consequent is "((x == singer || x == baby) && (singer /= baby))"