To what extent is philosophy axiomatically intuited from science and vice versa?
3 phoenixhaber 1 8/27/2025, 6:09:38 PM
There is this interesting question of the extent to which philosophy is grounded in what we know as science. Wittgenstein appeared to be inspired by atomic theory, Heidegger by the invention of the radio and so on. To what extent is philosophy grounded in what we know scientifically and how does this deconstruct past philosophy? Is the new trend in computation the motivation for higher order metaphysics and does a quantum theory of physics deconstruct Wittgensteins atomists views from which he derived the basis of his thought?
I've written some philosophy and constructed a language at these addresses and I'm interested in critique as well. I should read higher order metaphysics which I have not done so yet, but take as the basis axiomatically of my positions a combination of set theory and logical predicates.
roundabouthoolahoop.neocities.org/philosophy
roundabouthoolahoop.neocities.org/maegrashoda
To the extent that my language covers higher order logical constructs it does so by operating on the grammatical construction operator "ma" - see definitions of chaos and pattern. It's heavily inspired by lisp syntax and has a base in dasein related to a quantum indeterminacy of what being exists as such.
Comments (1)
phoenixhaber · 5h ago
I should note that related to the above I may or may not have recreates the wheel of what is happening in higher order logic, although my belief is that this is the most parsimonious possible syntax which could be translated into a computer architecture (as in an agentic AI could use this as a higher order language to be given commands and form a syntax tree in mich the same way that python exists above assembly). I also, given that philosophy may be conjoined or entangled with science, claim that this is the truth totality of the universe if we were to discover some scientific or observable basis for that which exists that overturns the model and I believe that my phenomenal basis for understanding truth has made that understood (if tomorrow else find that the universe is made of quantum foam then my basis for the base of dasein would have to be modified or overturned). My belief is that given what we know my model is extensible as well as simplistic (in a good sense). Any questions or comments would be welcome - I lack feedback.