Show HN: Base, an SQLite database editor for macOS

205 __bb 69 8/25/2025, 2:17:38 PM menial.co.uk ↗
I recently released v3 of Base, my SQLite editor for macOS.

The goal of this app is to provide a comfortable native GUI for SQLite, without it turning into a massive IDE-style app.

The coolest features are

- That it can handle full altering of tables, which is quite finicky to do manually with SQLite.

- It has a more detailed display of column constraints than most editors. Each constraint is shown as an icon if active, with full details available on clicking the icon.

This update also adds support for attaching databases, which is a bit fiddly with macOS sandboxing.

I'd love to hear any feedback or answer any questions.

Comments (69)

thomasqbrady · 1h ago
I've been using Base for [checks... considers retirement] about 15 years!? It's ALWAYS been great, AND has improved over time.
DwnVoteHoneyPot · 1h ago
Useful comment because I always assume these "Show HN" products are minimally viable... whereas, it's good to know it's been battle tested for at least 15 years.
riazrizvi · 1h ago
I assume they must be new too. Nice to see a project that’s been around for a while get posted and reach number 1.
reactordev · 3m ago
Nice. I used to use Sequel Pro back in the day. Now, I just use my IDE.

I like these kinds of things though. Minimal purpose built tools.

earthnail · 1h ago
It would be amazing if it could display UUIDs. SQlite doesn't support them natively, but many people store them as binary blobs.

Jetbrains products realize that these binary values are UUIDs and let me edit them easily.

supportengineer · 22m ago
Sometimes a binary blob contains perfectly printable characters.

A binary blob of 7-bit-clean ASCII still fits within a binary blob.

__bb · 29m ago
Thanks, I'll make a note of that. It's not a behaviour I've seen before.
dlachausse · 1m ago
I see that this software is available for direct sale, the Mac App Store, and through Set App. What is your revenue breakdown from each if you don’t mind sharing?
packetlost · 1h ago
What does this offer over sqlitebrowser? https://sqlitebrowser.org/
__bb · 1h ago
To my (biased) mind the advantages are:

- It fits with the system better and behaves more like other macOS apps

- I believe Base has better create/alter table support

However Base doesn’t (currently) have support for SQLCipher.

cosmic_cheese · 57m ago
Just to expand on the “behavior” bit, there’s a truckload of little things that native AppKit apps get you that nothing else will, not even other “native” toolkits like Qt. Things like Option-clicking a disclosure triangle in a nested list expanding/collapsing all children recursively, which one comes to use frequently and misses when absent. Foreign toolkits have spotty coverage of that kind of thing if they implement any at all.

As much as visually fitting in is important, behavior is perhaps bigger. Anybody who’s working on the Mac port of a cross platform toolkit would do well to replicate those little bits.

harikb · 32m ago
Wow! I just discovered option-click in Finder -- unrelated to sqlite :o . Thank you! thank you!
vsl · 1h ago
Polish and decent UI...
packetlost · 1h ago
I find the sqlitebrowser UI to be perfectly fine. It's not pretty, but it's a tool so who cares.
dewey · 1h ago
People care about the tools they are using a lot and spend a great deal of time on finding the perfect knife, the perfect editor, the perfect scissors.
latexr · 29m ago
> It's not pretty, but it's a tool so who cares.

People who care about their tools. If I have to stare at it all day, being pleasant on the eyes is a feature. If every time I grab my tool I think “urk, this is so ugly”, it affects my flow.

mrtksn · 46m ago
Unfortunately sqlite browser was too unstable for me. I purchased another app just because I can’t stand crashing apps.
WhitneyLand · 1h ago
Base is nicely done, I’ve found it worthwhile over other options.
jen20 · 1h ago
A nicer user interface. Personally I use datagrip but I want to encourage real native Mac software so will likely buy this anyway.
p_ing · 1h ago
Prettier UI?
Gelob · 1h ago
wondering the same thing
colesantiago · 1h ago
sqlitebrowser is 100% open source, cross platform and free.

I don't think Base is at all and only supports macOS

gwbas1c · 1h ago
> Create and modify tables with ease using Base's visual table editor. No need to write complex CREATE or ALTER statements.

I'm trying to understand who your target audience is? Normally, I think of SQLite as something that only a programmer would use. (And thus these kind of statements happen within an application.)

What kind of use cases are you handling where someone is manually creating / changing a schema?

> Import data from CSV and SQL dump files. Export your results to SQL, delimited text, JSON, and Excel formats.

IE, who's using SQLite in this way, and what are they using it for?

latexr · 19m ago
I know researchers (think field biology) who need to enter data into SQLite databases with bespoke apps but on occasion it’s imperative to edit or search the database directly. I’ve helped them do that on some butt-ugly app they had installed whose name escapes me. Looking at Base, my immediate thought was to buy it for them.

Additionally, while I know my way around and even enjoy the command-line, on occasion I bump into some app’s SQLite database that I want to explore. I can see myself using a GUI for those instances to help me find the data I’m looking for faster.

jraph · 1h ago
You call do everything with the sqlite cli tool, but GUIs are very convenient to explore and play with the databases.

I have regularly used sqlitebrowser. You can even get create table statements corresponding to tables you have drafted with it, and you can copy-paste these statements in your code. Or build and test a sql statement incrementally, and paste it in your code when you are happy.

Or even to plain browse data, explore database from other tools, etc. There are a lot of occasions where such a tool can be convenient.

tracker1 · 1h ago
Potentially about anyone who used Access without the forms interfaces... While I'm not the biggest fan, I know a lot of people who prefer a visual editor for table schema creation. They'll use SQL Management Studio, or whatever equivalent with other DBMS and edit that way instead of DB specific queries... For example, re-ordering fields is destructive in a lot of DBMS and the queries get painful, a visual editor eases this burden.

As to importing/exporting data (csv, etc), You can't exactly run queries against a CSV generally (I mean you can with JET/ODBC, but still)... it's a chore.

To another point, I often feel that sqlite is a great backup format for data, it's portable, you can query directly, etc. I kind of wished that Azure Data Studio (now discontinued) had directly supported loading CSV/TXT etc into an in-memory or temp db for queries and portability similar to mentioned between various data sources (sqlite, mssql, pgsql, etc).

__bb · 1h ago
A lot of people use it as a step up from Excel.

I’ve got quite a few scientists using it for data analysis, a whole bunch of people importing sales data for querying.

A good number of folks never write any SQL and just use the GUI to sort/filter data.

I’ve also heard from people who use Base to design a schema and then export the SQL into their codebase.

EDIT: I should add that Base does nothing that that the command line tool can't. But it does offer more convenience, particularly for those who might be less comfortable writing SQL.

revskill · 2m ago
Hate apple products these days.
markusw · 1h ago
I've just tried it out, looks nice!

I've been using TablePlus a lot, but there are some SQLite-specific features I'd really like to have in an app:

- Foreign keys enabled by default, so I don't have to remember to enable that in every session.

- Support for loading extensions automatically. I'm using sqlite-vec for example. Right now, browsing virtual tables for that just doesn't show that much, and executing a query just results in "no such module: vec0"

I'll keep an eye on the project. :-)

__bb · 15m ago
Thanks!

Auto-enabling foreign keys absolutely should be an option. I'll make a note of it.

I don't know about auto-loading extensions though. Will have a look. That might not mix well with the App Store rules and I'm reluctant to let the direct/app store versions drift apart in terms of features.

wulfstan · 1h ago
I bought your app in 2010 and use it regularly. Thanks for making it!
__bb · 30m ago
Thank you for the support :)
robinhood · 1h ago
Looks super nice. Congrats on the launch. Personally I use Harlequin, the TUI SQL tool, which works best for me. I don't really GUI for these kind of tools, but I can understand the value for some. Wishing you all the success with this new version.
__bb · 1h ago
Thank you, that's very kind. I've always like the idea of TUIs, but found it hard to get used to them.
criddell · 1h ago
> without it turning into a massive IDE-style app

Is that another way of saying you don't want to make MS Access?

I still use Access quite a bit and I think it's pretty great. It's too bad that nothing like that exists for modern databases.

__bb · 23m ago
Sort of, yes. But mostly that I don't want the app to become the "everything to everyone" style of editor. I want it to remain tightly focused on the features that SQLite provides.

It's unlikely that I'll add a form builder or report generator to the app. I don't want it to grow until it can send email.

al_borland · 2h ago
I was looking for something like this a few months ago and was having trouble surfacing anything. This looks nice. My work is pretty conservative on allowing me to use something like this, but I will definitely be noting it down for my next personal project where this would be helpful.
breadwinner · 57m ago
Those who prefer web-based interfaces can try Visual DB: https://visualdb.com/sqlite/
naikrovek · 33m ago
Who in the world would prefer a web-based database tool which you must run locally over a normal web database tool which runs locally?

The “thick” tool will always be more efficient than a browser-based tool. It will always be more native and integrate with the OS better. It will perform better (though that may not always be visible).

Yes I am seriously asking. The web is the worst application platform ever created, despite being maybe the only true cross-platform platform.

breadwinner · 29m ago
Some people prefer native apps. Some people prefer web-based apps. Native apps are not automatically better -- there are web-based apps that work better than native apps.

> The web is the worst application platform ever created

That's an extreme position. Today no one is making native Windows apps because the web has defeated native apps on Windows.

didip · 28m ago
It would be super duper cool if it can connect to DuckDB as well.
nicoritschel · 9m ago
I am launching a similar tool very soon; it's built in Swift & macOS only. Here's the web version I built almost a year ago you can play with in the meantime.

https://sidequery.dev

benhurmarcel · 1h ago
Can somebody recommend a similar tool that works with DuckDB files?
nicoritschel · 10m ago
I am launching one very soon; it's similarly built in Swift & macOS only. Here's the web version I built almost a year ago you can play with in the meantime.

https://sidequery.dev

weaksauce · 53m ago
not as slick as this tool but https://dbeaver.io/ handles duckdb databases as well as a myriad of others.
TheJoeMan · 2h ago
May I ask what you are using on the backend for verifying the web purchases? Is it a key, or online activation once downloaded?
__bb · 1h ago
I use Paddle (https://paddle.com/) as merchant of record because I don't want to deal with the paperwork of doing more myself. In practical terms, it's a key emailed after purchase.
vahid4m · 1h ago
Does apple allow you to to sell both through App Store and direct through another payment echo system? I thought they are more strict than that.

https://menial.co.uk/base/buy/

__bb · 1h ago
Yes, it's OK to do that, but not to cross the streams. You can't advertise direct purchases from the Mac App Store version.
janten · 2h ago
Happy Base user for almost ten years now. Hands down the best SQLite editor on macOS.
__bb · 1h ago
Thank you for the support! It means a lot.
Alifatisk · 1h ago
Been looking for something like this, I also wish there was a way for multiple users to collaborate and interact with the same database.

Think like MySql Workbench but for multiple users, that would be incredible

jen20 · 1h ago
That is a limitation of SQLite no?
Alifatisk · 10m ago
I am thinking of an application where multiple users can interactive with the workbench BUT the workbench performs its actions against the database as one user
breadwinner · 33m ago
Yes and no. SQLite can handle a small number of users. It locks the entire database while writing to it, so it can't support a large number of concurrent users.
pietz · 2h ago
How have I never heard of this before? Been looking for a sleek, minimal SQLite client for more than a year now.
mastermage · 1h ago
Wait doesnt DBeaver work on MacOS aswell?
lukasb · 1h ago
Needed this for developing my Tauri app, been working great.
ZPrimed · 1h ago
if I purchase, am I required to scream "ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US !!" ?
__bb · 1h ago
It's not required, but you can if you want :)
sneak · 1h ago
Thank you for offering a purchase option outside of the MAS. It sucks that Apple is trying to force everyone to identify themselves to install apps and some of us prefer not having an Apple ID.
reaperducer · 1h ago
The goal of this app is to provide a comfortable native GUI for SQLite, without it turning into a massive IDE-style app.

As an aside, feature bloat is a massive problem with macOS database tools.

I'd happily pay for something basic, native, and pretty like Sequel Ace†, but all of the other options are Swiss Army knives for power users who need to tweak every little thing. I just want to do some queries.

† I'd pay for Sequel Ace, too, if it didn't crash every time I close a tab.

nodesocket · 2h ago
This looks great, installing now. I've been using DBeaver, but it's not optimized for SQLite. Common issue with DBeaver is having to refresh the global connection to see changes.

EDIT: Very minor nitpick but noticed I changed my icon to dark, but not taking effect. Still using light icon.

bdcravens · 2h ago
What you just described sounds like the kind of marketing I feel is missing from the site: if you're already using a multi-db tool, what's compelling about this product?
__bb · 1h ago
That's a good point and something I'd not considered.

I'd say the main benefit is that it's tailored only to SQLite's features.

You don't have to tweak a UI tailored for remote connections to work with local files. You don't need to have extra sections dedicated to user management or stored procedures which are inactive. I guess I'm saying that in this case less is more!

TheRealPomax · 1h ago
Why is it MacOS only though? Surely this can cross-compile for Linux and Windows perfectly fine?
__bb · 1h ago
As others have said, this is written using AppKit and SwiftUI, which are only available for macOS.

This makes for a much nicer app for mac users, even if it does cut your potential audience.

hoistbypetard · 1h ago
Because it a GUI that uses Mac-specific UI libraries that aren't available on Linux and Windows?

While the database stuff works on Linux and Windows, building UIs for the 3 platforms is very different, unless you use some cross platform wrapper layer. Which isn't the purpose of this one. You might want sqlitebrowser[1] if you're looking for something like that.

[1]:https://sqlitebrowser.org

jen20 · 1h ago
Probably because it’s written using native Mac UI instead of half-assed with electron.