Show HN: Bizcardz.ai – Custom metal business cards
18 rhodey 29 8/20/2025, 5:54:22 PM github.com ↗
Bizcardz.ai is a website where you design business cards which are converted to KiCad PCB schematics which can be manufactured (using metals) by companies such as Elecrow and PCBWay
The site is free. Elecrow charges about $1 per pcb in quantities of 50 and $0.80 in quantities of 100.
I have hacked away at this on and off for about two years so just happy to get it published
If you're handing out business cards with a HASL finish, make sure to spend extra for the lead-free version.
Scrollbars can help!
I really like the idea, although the designs are a bit limited and I don't know that I'd use this tool if I did want to make this kind of business card. But looking at the UI, this is all stuff that would be pretty easy to make responsive, and would work fairly well on mobile. It's a bit of a shame to add an arbitrary limitation like this.
I have no idea what this means.
> MIT: non-commercial use, Proprietary: commercial use, contact for terms: hello@bizcardz.ai
Then, right under it:
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions ...
What?
[0] https://github.com/rhodey/bizcardz.ai/blob/master/LICENSE
This can be found online as "dual licensing"
Presently you say this: > This software is available under two licenses: > MIT: non-commercial use > Proprietary: commercial use, contact for terms: hello@bizcardz.ai
What this means:
"You may select from one of two licenses for this software: - the MIT license which has no restrictions of any kind - a proprietary license you must contact me to learn about."
I get you think adding "non-commercial" to that line means you're telling folks the MIT option is only for noncommercial uses, but that's not the end effect. What you are actually saying is that people can choose MIT or not, and they're going to choose MIT. You tried to say it's MIT only for noncommercial, but that language IS NOT IN THE MIT LICENSE and so your statement is unenforcable. We're only trying to help you here.
What I think you're looking for:
You may select from one of two licenses for this software: 1. All use where the code is used in a commercial, revenue generating, or other for-pay or professional use, you must purchase a license. Contact me for details. 2. For non-commercial uses the software is free to use, modify, and redistribute for other non-commercial uses.
Then you want to use a license that agrees with your desires, and MIT is not that license.
Right now anyone can take your code, take it under MIT, and you've got literally nothing to say about it. So just change that license, that's all.
Or don't it's not our code that will be misused.
Never write a legal document yourself. Always talk to a lawyer because these traps are really easy to set.
If you disagree, then it's not MIT but some custom license, so don't label it as such.
I publish many things without dual licensing and yet your kind will not be satisfied
IANAL but you also might want to consult a lawyer since your franken-license contradicts itself. It might be hard to challenge a company in court when they steal your code.
There is nowhere a claim that this is MIT
If they want to let people use it in non-commercial settings but are willing to provide a license for commercial use, then they could have provided a non-commercial license.
If they wanted to provide a FOSS license, then they should have provided one and offered a dual license option (by the actual commonly accepted usage of that term in this context).
If they want to make an MIT-like license but make it for non-commercial use, then they should just call it a non-commercial license and not confuse the issue by claiming it's MIT.
As it stands, they've provided a FOSS license, that explicitly allows the use, modification, redistribution and resale in commercial settings, but slapped a "non-commercial" term at the top of it.
"Please use this software however you like, including in commercial settings, redistributing it for profit and modifying it for your commercial use. Also, don't use it for commercial use"
What?
https://bizcardz.ai/faq
On the FAQ page there are links to images of the end result / physical
Instead of: Gihub Link => bizcardz => FAQ => "Show me the end result"