Very weird errors in the site, is this AI generated?
When you click on the 2 year old options, it says "6 Activities for Kids Aged 2" despite there being 19 shown, and the text begins "Nine-year-olds are full of ideas..."
It looks like most of the blog posts for the site were also generated by ChatGPT. In the most recent article [0], all of the provided links include "?utm_source=chatgpt.com"
In "How to Reduce Kids’ Screen Time – Without the Tantrums" [1], half of the expert quotes were misquoted or could not be confirmed.
Good catch. Yeah, definitely AI-generated. The text in the images are in that unmistakeable ChatGPT 4o image generation font that's weirdly kinda fat and oddly kerned.
You missed the puzzle itself, where it’s actually three fingers. Kind of impressive degree of inconsistency, honestly.
woadwarrior01 · 1h ago
The images are certainly GPT Image 1 generated. Also, the text on the about page is almost certainly AI generated.
tinier_subsets · 1h ago
I never fully believed the “em-dashes are an AI giveaway” meme — until I saw that front page.
eszed · 47m ago
I'm really sad about this, because I'm a word (and punctuation) nerd and use em-dashes in my own writing, because they're correct, dagnabit. Now I'm reconsidering the practice.
nxobject · 36m ago
This may cause some psychic damage, but I use en dashes instead for this reason... even though yes, it's only conventionally used for numeric ranges.
ascorbic · 50m ago
LLMs don't put spaces around their em-dashes.
bongodongobob · 1h ago
Looks exactly like images generated by M365 copilot if I don't ask for something specific.
lynndotpy · 55m ago
The "illustration" on the front page absolutely smacks of the ai-generates aesthetic, and especially the illustrations in the "posts".
I don't understand what the point of this website is. It's disingenuous, shallow, and artificial. If someone wanted to outsource their relationship with their offspring to a text generator, why wouldn't they just go to ChatGPT directly?
I can't imagine there's much overlap between people who want their kids to have less screen-time, but also have no standards for what replaces the screen time.
ascorbic · 51m ago
The images are probably AI, but I don't think the site itself is. It's a WordPress site, and the about page says the author is a web designer and the link in the footer is to a WordPress agency.
androng · 1h ago
all of the pictures are AI-generated, probably from GPT-image-1
DataDaoDe · 1h ago
Just put your kids outside. You don't need anything as a kid to start playing. We used sticks and mud and built ourselves houses and towns and had wars and put on plays and did everything under the sun without toys or anything.
Some trees and dirt will take you a long way providing thousands of hours of fun. As kids we found these big black horned beetles and started a beetle gladiator arena that kept us preoccupied for months at a time feeding and training our biggest beetles. Kids are very creative if you let them be.
hnlmorg · 57m ago
Exactly this.
We have so many outdoor toys from footballs and outdoor table tennis tables, to outdoor chalk, sand pits and so on and so forth.
Yet most of the time the boys just want water fights and the girls just want to do cartwheels.
Structured play is definitely important. But unstructured play even more so. It’s amazing what kids can find to entertain themselves when they’re left alone.
percentcer · 1h ago
Predatory AI-generated site feeding off parents' anti-screen anxiety, no thanks.
I remember having the juggling one! Thanks for reminding me of Klutz. I'm hoping to finally have kids in the near future and, while I don't want to completely shield them from all tech, I do want to ground them in reality with "real" activities. I may order a bunch of their books in the future.
Leftb · 1h ago
The fact that 'join a X group/class/workshop' shows up so often does make this a lot less useful. When you're looking for "easy-to-set-up activities for kids of all ages" a sign up process with some external organization isn't really 'it'.
JdeBP · 21m ago
Interestingly, for it being built as part of the promotional effort for the authors's LLM-based WWW-site generator that autocreates (in their promotional blurb's own words) thousands of topic pages instantly for search-engine "optimization", this has been submitted onto http://url.town as one of only two entries in that site's "Family" section. This promotion clearly worked.
"Within the last few weeks, Mark and I have built and launched Offline.Kids.
It’s a website to help parents reconnect with their kids and for kids to reconnect with the world around them.
Offline.Kids is directory of screen-free activities for all ages. Each activity is categorised so that parents can find appropriate activities for their situation.
For example, you can find:
quick, clean activities for a 6 year olds
outdoor kids activities that take 1-2 hours
low energy indoor crafts
We built the site off the back of our new directory landing page plugin (catchy name still in progress!). It instantly creates thousands of SEO friendly landing pages for the activities. It’s early days, but Google is successfully indexing the pages and we’ll see how the rankings change over time.
So, if you’re looking for screen-free activities for your kids, check out the website, and share with anyone you think might find it useful!"
EduardLev · 1h ago
This looks like it could be really cool. However there are obvious mistakes pointed out by other comments which makes me distrust the content. I'm sure there are still good ideas in there, I just don't think they would be as creative as I would likr
throwanem · 1h ago
No one needs to hear their screen reader say "yellow squiggle."
valbaca · 7m ago
is that true? I thought communicating what a full-sight person would see is important. Accessibility isn't just about text. Closed-captions vs Subtitles.
topheroo · 1h ago
I wonder how much of the site was AI-generated. The images definitely are (kids with different numbers of fingers from each other in the same picture lol).
pton_xd · 1h ago
I really want the "Note from the Founder" to be fully AI generated too, image and everything. Our fully unauthentic web of the future has finally arrived!
duxup · 1h ago
It's not like before AI we got a lot of genuine founder stories either ;)
TheRealPomax · 1h ago
You could just have read the "about" page. Who cares if there's AI involved, this is a dad who made a thing for his own kids, and opened it up for everyone else. So what if they used AI if it does what they hoped it'd do and their kids like it?
nemomarx · 53m ago
Fine for them, but why would I use it instead of using my own AI for my own kids?
It's like reading other people's chat gpt conversations, not very interesting or useful.
IshKebab · 1h ago
> So what if they used AI
It matters because it's a very strong signal of quality.
snapcaster · 1h ago
I'd say it's a strong signal of (lack of) effort, which then correlates with quality
lynndotpy · 23m ago
And, crucially, the quality _is_ low. At a bare minimum, the generated safety bulletpoints should be able to anticipate safety concerns with following the generated activities. The people publishing the posts should read them first and check for safety concerns.
The generated posts don't meet this bare minimum. For example, some posts have activities for toddlers involving string or rope, but do not mention the non-obvious strangulation risks. This website should not have been published in this state.
watwut · 37m ago
Because, if you AI generated the activities too, the site is useless. We can ChatGpt generate activities too and get the same result.
cush · 1h ago
I feel while developers continue to spend their time and energy gatekeeping how people build things, AI is going to continue to enable those people to build what they want. You'd be surprised how little people care about how a product was built and just want it to do the things they need it to do.
The MySpace era internet where anyone can create a page is back and I'm here for it
beshrkayali · 1h ago
Quality, security, and code that doesn't fall apart later matter. I don't want
AI slop children books to be a thing. I hear you on AI making it easier for people to build stuff, but calling valid concerns "gatekeeping" is a bit off.
With that said, I really like this site and the approach!
uoaei · 1h ago
The study linked in OP is already a clear counterexample to your point, though. It's clear from all the slop that quality control is low on the priority list of so-called "builders" using AI. They do the first 20% to get a mockup and then decide it's done.
Did anyone even review these AI generated posts before publishing? It's one thing to publish something you didn't write, but it's another thing to publish something you didn't even bother to read:
This activity for ages 3 to 10:
> Instructions
> 1. Clear a safe space in your home
> 2. Set up crawling sections under chairs
> 3. Create jumping stations with pillows
> 4. Make balance beams with rope
> 5. Design tunnels with boxes
First, you should not be leaving children unattended around string or rope (the materials listed here). It's negligent to have that absent from the safety tips, and it's concerning that knowledge is obscure enough that the text generator wouldn't provide a bullet point with that advice.
But also, how many people have a place where they can "Make balance beams with rope"? What low-to-the-floor fixtures do people commonly have with the sheer strength to make a tightrope for children to walk across?
toisanji · 59m ago
Nice work on offline.kids and kudos for tackling screen-free play. I've been playing in a similar space. If you want something complementary for the inevitable “but why?” moments, you might like StudyTurtle Ask (https://studyturtle.com/ask). It’s a free, no-signup AI Q&A tuned for 3–9 year-olds with:
Strict age calibration (matching phrasing and examples to each developmental level)
Automated QA to catch count mismatches (“6 activities” vs 19) and AI slip-ups
Concrete analogies (“volcanoes are like shaken soda bottles”) and kitchen-table experiments you can actually do
lynndotpy · 51m ago
This is just an AI generate advertisement in the comments for a link to an AI generated site.
toisanji · 46m ago
i wrote it...
ahofmann · 35m ago
I believe you but this only shows how hard it is to tell ai generated text apart.
crawsome · 1h ago
To think, it's possible this entire thing was vibe coded.
joewhale · 56m ago
it 100% was. i wonder in 2-3 years if it will start being harder to tell.
throwanem · 44m ago
It is already pretty hard to tell.
ahofmann · 37m ago
I'm honestly shocked how hard it is to prove that the site is ai generated.
There is a very strong ai-vibe, but to find proof in the pictures is hard on most of them (not the pizza one, that one looks awful).
RyanOD · 1h ago
It's funny to use the online to help us with activities our kids can do offline.
Triphibian · 1h ago
Phone obsessed parent looking at website while kids stand with rocks in hand by lake, not knowing what to do. "It says you throw the rocks into the water and have fun."
kfajdsl · 1h ago
fyi your (?) css is messed up for the 'Show activities by...' images on a viewport that's the size of a macbook pro 14" display split in half vertically
zeld4 · 1h ago
it should be a printable book.
wintermutestwin · 1h ago
Can we please stop using “screens” as a pejorative?
There are plenty of examples where a screen provides a better and more enriching/edifying experience than dead trees, etc
vouaobrasil · 1h ago
It's true that screens are helpful. But at least in many cases, they are making life worse. It's not that there aren't benefits, but in many specific domains, the negatives outweight the positives. This is true for children because they no longer have mental space to think for themselves, and it is true for many adults as well who spend 8+ hours in front of them. It might make the enterprises they work for more efficient, but it doesn't necessarily make the work enviroment better.
So I think there is sense to use "screens" in the pejorative sense. They are quite irritiating.
cush · 1h ago
Where do you see "screens" used in the pejorative?
IshKebab · 1h ago
On the linked page:
> Discover simple, screen-free activities
The implication that screens are bad is obvious to normal people.
> The late Steve Jobs famously didn't let his own children have iPads when they were young
Is this from his biography or something? I haven't read it. But the iPad came out in 2010 and Jobs passed away in 2011. I'm not sure how the timeline works there.
jjulius · 1h ago
This claim has been passed around for years and comes from an article in 2011.
>“So, your kids must love the iPad?” I asked Mr. Jobs, trying to change the subject. The company’s first tablet was just hitting the shelves. “They haven’t used it,” he told me. “We limit how much technology our kids use at home.”
When you click on the 2 year old options, it says "6 Activities for Kids Aged 2" despite there being 19 shown, and the text begins "Nine-year-olds are full of ideas..."
The images are good but kinda off... e.g. for https://offline.kids/activity/water-play-tub/ the kid and tub are floating in a even larger body of water, and for https://offline.kids/activity/fabric-sensory-tunnel/ there is a magical rigid blanket-tunnel.
In "How to Reduce Kids’ Screen Time – Without the Tantrums" [1], half of the expert quotes were misquoted or could not be confirmed.
[0] https://offline.kids/teaching-kids-to-lose-gracefully/ [1] https://offline.kids/how-to-reduce-kids-screen-time-without-...
On AI's struggles with hands: do humans have four or five fingers? Why not both!? https://offline.kids/activity/diy-jigsaw-puzzle/
You missed the puzzle itself, where it’s actually three fingers. Kind of impressive degree of inconsistency, honestly.
I don't understand what the point of this website is. It's disingenuous, shallow, and artificial. If someone wanted to outsource their relationship with their offspring to a text generator, why wouldn't they just go to ChatGPT directly?
I can't imagine there's much overlap between people who want their kids to have less screen-time, but also have no standards for what replaces the screen time.
Some trees and dirt will take you a long way providing thousands of hours of fun. As kids we found these big black horned beetles and started a beetle gladiator arena that kept us preoccupied for months at a time feeding and training our biggest beetles. Kids are very creative if you let them be.
We have so many outdoor toys from footballs and outdoor table tennis tables, to outdoor chalk, sand pits and so on and so forth.
Yet most of the time the boys just want water fights and the girls just want to do cartwheels.
Structured play is definitely important. But unstructured play even more so. It’s amazing what kids can find to entertain themselves when they’re left alone.
We need Klutz to come back https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klutz_Press
* https://highrise.digital/blog/building-offline-kids-a-direct...
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44765730#44782446
---
"Within the last few weeks, Mark and I have built and launched Offline.Kids.
It’s a website to help parents reconnect with their kids and for kids to reconnect with the world around them.
Offline.Kids is directory of screen-free activities for all ages. Each activity is categorised so that parents can find appropriate activities for their situation.
For example, you can find:
quick, clean activities for a 6 year olds outdoor kids activities that take 1-2 hours low energy indoor crafts We built the site off the back of our new directory landing page plugin (catchy name still in progress!). It instantly creates thousands of SEO friendly landing pages for the activities. It’s early days, but Google is successfully indexing the pages and we’ll see how the rankings change over time.
So, if you’re looking for screen-free activities for your kids, check out the website, and share with anyone you think might find it useful!"
It's like reading other people's chat gpt conversations, not very interesting or useful.
It matters because it's a very strong signal of quality.
The generated posts don't meet this bare minimum. For example, some posts have activities for toddlers involving string or rope, but do not mention the non-obvious strangulation risks. This website should not have been published in this state.
The MySpace era internet where anyone can create a page is back and I'm here for it
With that said, I really like this site and the approach!
Did anyone even review these AI generated posts before publishing? It's one thing to publish something you didn't write, but it's another thing to publish something you didn't even bother to read:
This activity for ages 3 to 10:
> Instructions
> 1. Clear a safe space in your home
> 2. Set up crawling sections under chairs
> 3. Create jumping stations with pillows
> 4. Make balance beams with rope
> 5. Design tunnels with boxes
First, you should not be leaving children unattended around string or rope (the materials listed here). It's negligent to have that absent from the safety tips, and it's concerning that knowledge is obscure enough that the text generator wouldn't provide a bullet point with that advice.
But also, how many people have a place where they can "Make balance beams with rope"? What low-to-the-floor fixtures do people commonly have with the sheer strength to make a tightrope for children to walk across?
Strict age calibration (matching phrasing and examples to each developmental level)
Automated QA to catch count mismatches (“6 activities” vs 19) and AI slip-ups
Concrete analogies (“volcanoes are like shaken soda bottles”) and kitchen-table experiments you can actually do
There is a very strong ai-vibe, but to find proof in the pictures is hard on most of them (not the pizza one, that one looks awful).
There are plenty of examples where a screen provides a better and more enriching/edifying experience than dead trees, etc
So I think there is sense to use "screens" in the pejorative sense. They are quite irritiating.
> Discover simple, screen-free activities
The implication that screens are bad is obvious to normal people.
The evidence is less clear: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9d0l40v551o
Is this from his biography or something? I haven't read it. But the iPad came out in 2010 and Jobs passed away in 2011. I'm not sure how the timeline works there.
>“So, your kids must love the iPad?” I asked Mr. Jobs, trying to change the subject. The company’s first tablet was just hitting the shelves. “They haven’t used it,” he told me. “We limit how much technology our kids use at home.”
https://archive.is/u3bbA