How Remote Work Died: A Girardian Tragedy in Corporate America

10 la_joconde 6 7/31/2025, 12:56:14 PM
In 2020, remote work felt like an inevitability. Studies showed productivity didn’t collapse. Employees were happier. Companies saved on real estate. Tech workers—especially engineers—started doing something radical: living well.

They fled San Francisco for Lisbon, New York for Buenos Aires, D.C. for Kraków. They claimed the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, slashing their tax bills. They worked from cafés, beaches, and co-living spaces—delivering the same (or better) output than their office-bound peers.

Then, suddenly, the backlash came. CEOs demanded a Return to Office. Managers moralized about “collaboration.” HR departments spun up surveillance tools to track badge swipes.

What happened?

The usual explanations—productivity! culture! innovation!—are weak. Study after study showed remote work didn’t hurt performance. So why the crackdown?

The Girardian Unmasking

French philosopher René Girard’s theories on mimetic desire and scapegoating explain this better than any MBA analysis. Here’s how:

1. Mimetic Desire: The Office as a Shared Delusion

Girard argued that humans don’t desire things directly—we desire through others. For decades, white-collar workers mimicked a single model of success:

Live in an expensive city.

Grind 60-hour weeks.

Chase promotions for status.

This system worked because everyone bought into the same fiction. Then came remote work—and a new model emerged:

Geoarbitrage.

Tax optimization.

Lifestyle freedom.

The moment workers saw colleagues thriving outside the system, the old model started crumbling. The desire shifted. But instead of adapting, corporations panicked.

2. The Scapegoat Mechanism: Sacrificing the Digital Nomad

When mimetic rivalry escalates, Girard says societies restore order by uniting against a scapegoat. Remote workers became that scapegoat.

Executives couldn’t admit the truth (“We’re jealous you escaped”), so they invented moral crises:

“Remote workers aren’t collaborating!” (Yet Slack/GitHub metrics disproved this.)

“We need office culture!” (But only after commercial real estate values tanked.)

“It’s not fair if some work remotely!” (A classic Girardian complaint—masking envy as justice.)

By forcing RTO, they ritually sacrificed the remote worker to restore the old order.

3. The Sacred Myth: “Offices = Serious Business”

Every institution has sacred myths it defends at all costs. For corporations, the myth is: “Real work happens in offices.”

Remote work exposed this as a lie. Worse, it revealed that:

Middle managers exist to supervise, not produce.

Commercial real estate is a paper tiger.

The tax-optimized nomad is winning capitalism better than the CEO.

The backlash wasn’t about productivity—it was about protecting the myth.

Today, hybrid work is a compromise no one loves—the worst of both worlds. But the genie won’t go back in the bottle. The more companies enforce RTO, the more they reveal the system’s fragility.

If you have a scapegoat story, share it.

Comments (6)

FrankWilhoit · 4h ago
Businessmen are consumed by the emotional obsession that their employees and their customers are stealing from them, and that all laws and norms are designed exclusively to prevent them defending themselves from that theft.
la_joconde · 3h ago
I think deep down many of them know they provide zero value to a company and project their own fears of being a fraud. If an employee is not building a product/service or selling a product/service, he or she is part of the vast and bloated department of the "Bullsh*t Economy", its the largest department of every company.
kentich · 5h ago
> The usual explanations—productivity! culture! innovation!—are weak.

These excuses are weak indeed if you are up to date with the latest innovation in communication tools. For example, having video meetings through virtual frosted glass (via https://MeetingGlass.com/) eliminates the excuse of not having ad hoc discussions. But such tools will prevent surveillance, that's why they may not want it.

andyish · 4h ago
the office culture / remote workers don't collaborate always makes me laugh. It reminds me of a time when I worked in an office and a PR spent over a week waiting to be reviewed because one team didn't tell another team. They were literally sat two benches apart and the requesting team had to walk past them to go to the toilet, to the exit or each time they went for a coffee.
AnimalMuppet · 4h ago
Girard's theory is nonsense. For an excellent read on why, see https://shc.stanford.edu/arcade/publications/rofl/issues/vol...

To me, the most repugnant part of Girard is how he tampers with the evidence. Take Oedipus, for example. Does it support Girard's position? No, Oedipus deserved his exile, he was not a scapegoat. "Oh, but that part is a lie; of course a myth doesn't tell the truth." So Girard rewrites Oedipus to make it fit his theory, and then claims Oedipus as evidence that he is right! That's not evidence; it's forgery. And Girard does it all the time - the linked article lists example after example.

So, no, I can't take Girard seriously. And, sorry, but I can't take a Girardian analysis of anything seriously either.

Now, you can claim that the end of WFH is bogus. That's fine. Just don't think of it in Girardian terms.

la_joconde · 3h ago
Interesting, you go around the internet bestowing an imaginary permission for people to have ideas when they align with yours (ending WFH is bogus) and imposing some kind of imaginary restrictions on thought that doesn't align with yours (Girard offers insight).

Are you aware of the bizarre egocentrism this kind of psychology implies?