> the gaming site will reject the request and prompt the user to make a “verification deposit” of cryptocurrency — typically around $100 — before any money can be distributed
This is called "advance fee" scam. It is hundreds of years old.
Well, anyone who has $100 crypto bucks has already been scammed once.
tantalor · 9h ago
A fool and his crypto are soon parted!
BrenBarn · 1h ago
And even sooner joined!
chihuahua · 12h ago
A random website asks me to give them my cryptocurrency, and then they refuse to return it? Why, I thought I had seen the most shocking thing on earth, but this takes the cake!
ryandrake · 11h ago
I don't understand who keeps falling for this stuff. The victims are not all 90 year old grannies suffering from cognitive decline.
ovulator · 10h ago
Large of law numbers. There are a lot of idiots out there. I had a buddy; super nice, super funny guy, late 20's, but financially an idiot.
He sent a $1,000 check as "collateral" to some online "bank" to get a $10,000 "loan". I explained to him that this isn't how any of this works and he just paused and said, "Huh, so should put a stop payment on the second check?" He had sent them another $1,000 as some sort of second round of collateral for the loan or some other nonsense.
And I've known dumber people than him.
bena · 10h ago
Eventually they would have collected $20k of collateral for the loan
technothrasher · 10h ago
I've got a coworker who fell for, "You won a free electric drill from Home Depot! Click here and enter your credit card". I discovered his predicament when he was telling me how he managed to get an overseas vendor to agree to reduce a credit card charge he didn't recognize in half. That got me to pull a bit on the thread and the whole story unraveled. What it came down to, apparently, was simple gullibility. He didn't know if the drill prize was legit, but he just didn't think he would be targeted in a scam, so he figured, "Why not? Worst that happens is I don't get my drill."
onesociety2022 · 7h ago
But all he had to do in this case was dispute the fraudulent charge on his credit card? Credit cards in that sense are a lot safer than anything crypto - you have the opportunity to dispute and reverse the transaction. And it's easy to do as well - it just takes a couple of seconds to login to the credit card website and file the dispute.
VTimofeenko · 11h ago
It's probably the law of probabilities at play, like with 419 scams. If you cast a sufficiently big net, chances of catching something in it are decent
rectang · 10h ago
I'm pretty sure I fell for a phishing scam a couple decades ago — my eBay password was compromised (fortunately there were no significant consequences). Once upon a time I also got tricked by the phone company into ordering stuff I didn't intend to. And while I don't think I've fallen for anything recently and am pretty security focused, it still takes mental energy to avoid all the traps.
I assume that the "people who fall for this stuff" are "people like me". Even the best among us are only statistically less likely to get snookered, not immune.
zahlman · 7h ago
One would think that the latter group aren't generally holding crypto in the first place.
datadrivenangel · 11h ago
If you thought you had won thousands of dollars you would likely be tempted to pay a hundred to get that out.
blaufuchs · 11h ago
Well there's the problem, who honestly thinks they won thousands of dollars from an ad?
alt219 · 10h ago
Sadly, I have a family member who is susceptible to these types of scams. They’ve been duped too many times to count. They’re overly eager to believe they’re exceptional and that good fortune is due them. No amount of explaining has had any impact on their beliefs for the past fifteen years. It’s heart-wrenching.
ryandrake · 10h ago
I can almost understand the replies to this thread where the victim was never exposed to a scam before and didn't know what to look for. It still sounds wild but I guess people are sheltered. My kid was scammed out of some virtual pet in an online game at six years old and learned that whenever someone offers something to you, but requires you to give up something first, it's a scam.
But how does one get scammed over and over, having seen it before and knowing what the playbook looks like?
supermatt · 3h ago
> whenever someone offers something to you, but requires you to give up something first, it's a scam.
Don’t you usually pay for things before you receive them when shopping legitimately?
jimt1234 · 10h ago
I had a girlfriend years ago that was an extreme optimist. She was a very intelligent person, very outgoing and very successful. She believed everyone was good, and no one ever did anything bad. We got into an argument once over this exact same thing - she thought she'd won a new laptop from some sort of popup ad; all she had to do was fill out some sort of form with a bunch of private info. I told her it was an obvious scam, and she got really defensive, telling me that I'm always so cynical and if I expect the worst from people, that's all I'm gonna get. I talked her out of submitting the private info to the form, but yeah, I can totally understand how reasonably intelligent people would fall victim to something like that. There's different motivations, but for my ex-girlfriend, it was her refusal to accept that people can be bad (take advantage of others).
toast0 · 11h ago
I punched that damn monkey, where's my prize?
dhosek · 10h ago
EVERYONE KNOWS YOU DON’T PUNCH THE MONKEY!
cyanydeez · 10h ago
Im gravitating towards tge 12 year old problem: while theres tons of other demographics, 12 year olds drive a lot of the grift economy. Its easiest to see in gaming with microtransactions and preorders. You can read hundreds of well articulated reasons not to engage these things yet they continue unabated.
JoeOfTexas · 12h ago
I spent too much time trying to build one of these gaming portals, and they pop them up as a scam like nothing. Must be a team of people behind it.
The technology behind the scenes and UI design are all well made.
jerf · 11h ago
As I like to say in some other contexts on HN, you must not underestimate the criminal underground. You should not model it as some hacker alone in his basement trying to run scams. You're probably a lot closer thinking of the industry as at least the equivalent of a Dark Google in size and sophistication. If I can imagine a framework where I have a strong set of modular APIs that we can deploy rapidly and put together some prompts for AIs to customize the frontends and graphics hooks so each site looks different, deploying them just like you'd deploy a k8s cluster of these things (and, heck, for all I know, actually being on k8s), the industry as a whole has more than enough firepower to actually implement it. There's an entire dark economy out there where you can outsource parts of this to specialized businesses and get sketchy cloud hosting of all kinds, there's a rich economy around who is taking what actual risks and who gets compensated for them, everything you can imagine.
psychoslave · 10h ago
Wait, didn't they officially adopted Darth Google as name when they drop the don't be evil moto façade ?
0cf8612b2e1e · 11h ago
Supposedly there are groups who make build-a-scam-website toolkits. The selling shovels model (which might even eliminate some legal risk).
simmerup · 10h ago
Must be easier to build them if you don't have to commit to building the actual product to be fair
dylan604 · 12h ago
Just goes to show the old adage "crime doesn't pay" is bullshit. it pays very well, right up to the point of if you get caught.
MattSayar · 11h ago
Tangentially, I haven't received a Pig Butchering opening text ("hey") in quite a while. A quick scan through my Spam & Blocked doesn't show much either, just a lot of political spam. Did something happen to improve the situation, or am I just lucky?
don_neufeld · 10h ago
I get between 5-10 per day, so I’d say you’re just lucky.
quickthrowman · 10h ago
Are you recently divorced? Just curious if public filings like divorce decrees would make someone a target for pig butchering scams.
brookst · 8h ago
The cost to operate is so low I can’t see why they’d bother targeting?
nottorp · 12h ago
Not online gaming. Online gambling.
fknorangesite · 11h ago
This (i.e., gambling specifically) is a very common definition of the word "gaming". Certainly that predates online video games, obviously.
eddythompson80 · 10h ago
You can’t call negative things gaming. You can gamify anything, but if it’s negative you can’t call it gaming. Gaming is always good and never causes any problems. Plenty of research shows that gaming is good. Please stop villainizing gaming. Gaming is good. If it’s negative, just call it what it is. Gambling, addiction, radicalization, etc all are just that. They have nothing to do with gaming. Gaming is good. Media has no affect on people.
Words can have different meanings in different contexts.
nottorp · 9h ago
> You can gamify anything
Actually gamifying is as predatory as gambling so what's your point again?
eddythompson80 · 8h ago
Don’t call it gaming. Gaming is good and has nothing to do with gambling. What is your point?
Ok look. If you put poison in food, it ceases to be food. It’s just poison at that point. Calling it food or even poisoned food is only an attempt to besmirch the good name of food. Food is always good for you. Any food that’s not good for you by definition isn’t food and no one can mistake it for food and any attempt at calling it food is just dishonest. Even having a discussion about food safety is nothing but a slippery slope to ban food they don’t like. Food is good.
mathgradthrow · 11h ago
Its a good thing that cryptocurrency transactions are easy to reverse.
dylan604 · 11h ago
“We were being spammed relentlessly by these scam posts from compromised or purchased [Discord] accounts,” Thereallo said. “I got frustrated with just banning and deleting, so I started to investigate the infrastructure behind the scam messages. This is not a one-off site, it’s a scalable criminal enterprise with a clear playbook, technical fingerprints, and financial infrastructure.”
This quote does not read like something I'd expect from a 17 year old.
erikerikson · 11h ago
17 year olds come in many flavors.
dylan604 · 10h ago
possibly, or possibly someone brushing up the original quote on the 17 year old's behalf.
MOARDONGZPLZ · 11h ago
Who exactly is online gambling? And out of that subset, who is doing super shady appearing online gambling? I don’t mean to be flippant, but who exactly is falling for this slop? At some point, permit me to victim blame, the victim is somewhat to blame.
dec0dedab0de · 11h ago
There are a lot of people using the internet with different physical and mental disabilities that make it difficult for them to identify these scams that might seem super obvious to you or I.
When I had cancer and I was in the hospital getting chemo I fell for a scam for the first time. It was an instagram ad for a cool steampunk looking keyboard with a price that was too good to be true. It was almost christmas, and I had felt guilty for not shopping, but my brain fog made it difficult to reason about. I ordered it and forgot all about it until it was too late to challenge. It was only $60, but it made it very clear to me how easy it would be to fall for something like this for a significant part of the population.
jerf · 11h ago
I think it's better to think of these things as relative. Not that I personally am absolutely invincible against scams, but that there is some scam of some level of sophistication that would get me, there's some threshold.
And that threshold will move over time, and as you say, depending on conditions. Even our personal defenses should not be predicated on being perfect all the time, and that's completely impractical at a societal level. And I worry about AI making it practical to target more people directly at scale and raise the sophistication on their end over the next 10-20 years.
Today I think I can say with a straight face that I'm quite sophisticated against this sort of scam. But the day will come, unless something gets me earlier, when my children will have to take my email account away if they want to inherit anything. Old age makes fools of us all. And who knows if something will get me earlier some other way. Unfortunately, invincible confidence in the here and now won't protect me.
dagw · 11h ago
who is doing super shady appearing online gambling?
At a guess, mostly people who for various reasons aren't allowed to gamble on more 'legit' sites, either because of their age or other local laws and jurisdictions. If you 'need' to gamble and are forbidden to gamble legally, then you will find a way to gamble illegally. Just look at the 'offline' world, before sports gambling became basically legal, lots of people would place bets with very shady operations.
badc0ffee · 11h ago
Half the population has a sub-100 IQ.
shkkmo · 11h ago
I would hazard a guess is that a generation of youth has been addicted to gambling by mobile game companies and even some desktop game companies like Valve (which has worked to limit it, but only when it was forced to by bad publicity.)
Gambling is a dangerous addiction for some people. I don't think victim blaming is an effective response.
>a generation of youth has been addicted to gambling by mobile game companies
I think you nailed it. I made a comment about the new "religion" of games in the current youth in another discussion a while back. It really seems to me that there is an incredibly strong illogical loyalty to game companies in the current youth. So much that they ignore bad actors assuming that they must be just another game company, even after they get scammed. I'm guessing it has something to do with zero real value nature of loot box and skin gambling that is prevalent.
This is called "advance fee" scam. It is hundreds of years old.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance-fee_scam
He sent a $1,000 check as "collateral" to some online "bank" to get a $10,000 "loan". I explained to him that this isn't how any of this works and he just paused and said, "Huh, so should put a stop payment on the second check?" He had sent them another $1,000 as some sort of second round of collateral for the loan or some other nonsense.
And I've known dumber people than him.
I assume that the "people who fall for this stuff" are "people like me". Even the best among us are only statistically less likely to get snookered, not immune.
But how does one get scammed over and over, having seen it before and knowing what the playbook looks like?
Don’t you usually pay for things before you receive them when shopping legitimately?
The technology behind the scenes and UI design are all well made.
Tell that to the government of Canada.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-197.ht...
Words can have different meanings in different contexts.
Actually gamifying is as predatory as gambling so what's your point again?
Ok look. If you put poison in food, it ceases to be food. It’s just poison at that point. Calling it food or even poisoned food is only an attempt to besmirch the good name of food. Food is always good for you. Any food that’s not good for you by definition isn’t food and no one can mistake it for food and any attempt at calling it food is just dishonest. Even having a discussion about food safety is nothing but a slippery slope to ban food they don’t like. Food is good.
This quote does not read like something I'd expect from a 17 year old.
When I had cancer and I was in the hospital getting chemo I fell for a scam for the first time. It was an instagram ad for a cool steampunk looking keyboard with a price that was too good to be true. It was almost christmas, and I had felt guilty for not shopping, but my brain fog made it difficult to reason about. I ordered it and forgot all about it until it was too late to challenge. It was only $60, but it made it very clear to me how easy it would be to fall for something like this for a significant part of the population.
And that threshold will move over time, and as you say, depending on conditions. Even our personal defenses should not be predicated on being perfect all the time, and that's completely impractical at a societal level. And I worry about AI making it practical to target more people directly at scale and raise the sophistication on their end over the next 10-20 years.
Today I think I can say with a straight face that I'm quite sophisticated against this sort of scam. But the day will come, unless something gets me earlier, when my children will have to take my email account away if they want to inherit anything. Old age makes fools of us all. And who knows if something will get me earlier some other way. Unfortunately, invincible confidence in the here and now won't protect me.
At a guess, mostly people who for various reasons aren't allowed to gamble on more 'legit' sites, either because of their age or other local laws and jurisdictions. If you 'need' to gamble and are forbidden to gamble legally, then you will find a way to gamble illegally. Just look at the 'offline' world, before sports gambling became basically legal, lots of people would place bets with very shady operations.
Gambling is a dangerous addiction for some people. I don't think victim blaming is an effective response.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_gambling
I think you nailed it. I made a comment about the new "religion" of games in the current youth in another discussion a while back. It really seems to me that there is an incredibly strong illogical loyalty to game companies in the current youth. So much that they ignore bad actors assuming that they must be just another game company, even after they get scammed. I'm guessing it has something to do with zero real value nature of loot box and skin gambling that is prevalent.