I don't think you can reasonably complain that the 9fans moderators rejected your argument when they stated that the problem was that they perceived your posting as having been AI-generated.
Many forums are struggling with AI-generated slop. It's inevitable that some human-generated content will be incorrectly flagged.
Perhaps a path forward is to subscribe, lurk for a while, answer a few queries succinctly and accurately, and thus build up a profile as a real user before attempting to initiate such a conversation again?
Or, perhaps a paper at IWP9 next year?
Also, you might consider posting about 9front on the 9front list, rather than 9fans, if your criticisms are specific to its development?
Many forums are struggling with AI-generated slop. It's inevitable that some human-generated content will be incorrectly flagged.
Perhaps a path forward is to subscribe, lurk for a while, answer a few queries succinctly and accurately, and thus build up a profile as a real user before attempting to initiate such a conversation again?
Or, perhaps a paper at IWP9 next year?
Also, you might consider posting about 9front on the 9front list, rather than 9fans, if your criticisms are specific to its development?