We use the same license as Sentry. We're not volunteers, happy to create positive-sum future.
mdaniel · 12h ago
It's your toy, you're welcome to license it however you wish. You are not welcome to call a source-available license as Open Source, because it is not open, it is just available for reading
Citing Sentry as inspiration is almost as bad as citing Hashicorp, since they both decided they were open until it inconvenienced them
louis030195 · 11h ago
Thanks for the feedback!
What would be the best approach? MIT/Apache? Or closed source?
Appreciate advice
gkbrk · 16h ago
How else are they supposed to get developer mindshare and free contributors without pretending to be Open Source?
Won't you think of the poor 40 million dollar business?
Citing Sentry as inspiration is almost as bad as citing Hashicorp, since they both decided they were open until it inconvenienced them
What would be the best approach? MIT/Apache? Or closed source?
Appreciate advice
Won't you think of the poor 40 million dollar business?