Ask HN: Is HN Pro-Fascist?

37 sundaeofshock 39 7/17/2025, 10:01:55 PM
It sure seems like many articles that are critical of the Trump Administration or of certain people in the tech world (eg Musk) are flagged in under an hour. It does not matter if it a tech focused article or pure politics, it will just be flagged.

What do people think: is HN pro-fascist?

Comments (39)

cadamsdotcom · 1h ago
It's a fallacy to argue that a community can be any specific thing. No community is a monolith. There are factions here, just like everywhere else.

There are multiple factions. There's the people fearful of AI, the people who post everything anyone posts if it vaguely relates to AI, the people who love to complain about AI posts, and the people who left because they got sick of all the AI stuff.

If you want a description of the politics related factions, just apply `sed -e s/AI/politics/g`.

techpineapple · 3h ago
If we didn’t flag a bunch of them, that’s all there would be. I like my HN with a side of politics, not the other way around.
ja27 · 3h ago
Exactly. There are thousands of other venues to share political news. Go there.
mikece · 3h ago
I think the OP's question is what about when the story, while involving politics, is more about technology than anything else? I can see flagging it on the principle that even mildly political tech stories bring out the political rhetoric in the comments... is that a principle among the moderation (I would strongly support that if it is)?
techpineapple · 1h ago
Funny thing is, I'm a liberal arts kinda guy, I'm mostly respond to political and special interest stories, and I find plenty of them, but I will flag like the 5th "Musk did something crazy" story I see in a week.
mindcrime · 3h ago
No, people just don't want to talk about Trump in general. I mean, what's the point of criticizing him, it would just be like "running up the score". Kind of pointless and resulting in no real glory or anything.
d00mB0t · 3h ago
I've noticed this too, not only on HN but the media in general.
p_ing · 3h ago
The issue is that they're often purely political in a way that doesn't relate to what some of us that use HN believe political posts should be.

I.e., Trump & deportations. Very political and would flag immediately. Trump & NASA, perhaps not flagged at all. Trump and his cankles? Flagged immediately. Trump & science grants? Perhaps not flagged at all.

This isn't reddit. Or at least, I'd hope it shouldn't be.

mikece · 3h ago
You think HN is pro-Trump? Quite the opposite from what I can tell! But I have also noticed that any story mentioning Trump gets flagged. I don't see this as fascist so much as it seems like there less than zero desire to see the name of Trump regardless of whether the story is positive or negative about him.

And yes, there are some things that are coming out of legislation which would usually be of big interest to HN (or at least I would think so) but I don't bother submitting stories if one or two particular people have their names prominent in the story. It is what it is.

EDIT: That said, the one I posted today didn't get flagged (yet): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44594622

EDIT 2: Something else that will get a story flagged seems to be anything about XLibre (for or against). I'm guessing that has to do with who is running that project which is kind of a shame since I'm curious why there's so much reflexive and visceral animosity for those suggesting we slow the roll on forcing all distros and desktop environments to move to Wayland.

Yizahi · 2h ago
Opinion answer - no, judging by the votes and contents of the majority of the comments about politically charged topics, I'm pretty sure that most of the people here are approximately center-left leaning, and more libertarian than authoritarian leaning. Some examples, without judging them - HN on average seems to support European worker protections than USA free for all stance, at the same time EU bureaucracy and red tape is mostly universally frowned upon as a factor slowing down economical innovation. Ukraine and Taiwan are supported more than Russia and China. Palestine/Israel opinion seems to be a split, but subjectively it seems majority leans pro-Palestine. Trump is universally reviled, I haven't seen any pro-Trump comments here (at least above 0 votes). Musk is a split opinion, but also majority seems to be against him this year. Megacorps are widely disliked, with a new anti-Google topic popping up very regularly, same with Facebook and Amazon, unless they are strictly about new good IT stuff. Creepto is mocked by majority, anarcho-capitalism too. Aaron Swarz is universally liked as are others with the same leaning.

All in all these are definitely not right wing opinions.

al_borland · 3h ago
I have trouble taking people seriously when they use “fascist” as a blanket term to discredit people they don’t like.
trog · 2h ago
Maybe we should define our terms then? I favour this definition of "ur-fascism" by Umberto Eco: https://archive.is/VamLM

To steal a few examples from a convenient summary list someone[1] made:

1. The cult of tradition. “One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements.”

2. The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”

3. The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”

4. Disagreement is treason. “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.”

...

10. Contempt for the weak. “Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology.”

Open to other definitions. But I look at that list, written in 1995, and it feels like you can check off a lot of these items in things that are rapidly being normalised.

1. https://www.openculture.com/2024/11/umberto-ecos-list-of-the...

bediger4000 · 1h ago
Do you feel the same about use of terms like "socialist" or "radical left"?
mcphage · 2h ago
I have trouble taking people seriously when they refuse to call things what they are because they don’t want to admit it.
PaulHoule · 21m ago
"Anti-fascists" were saying things like "Keir Starmer is a Fascist" (sci-fi writer Charlie Stross) or that "My local police department is Fascist" or "White people are Fascist"

If you know your 'Pataphysics or Chaos Magick you know that's a magic spell to put fascists in charge.

kcplate · 2h ago
The problem is that fascism historically encompassed a number of political and power qualities and what is being described as “fascist” today might have some of those qualities, but not necessarily all of them. Ironically the side yelling “fascist” today also has some of those qualities, but doesn’t want to admit either.

Probably just best to focus on those qualities you don’t like on the other side and leave the labeling to the future historians.

al_borland · 2h ago
Trump has given power back to the states for various things and seems to be consistently anti-war. Musk has been pushing the idea of starting a new political party to better represent the people and is for less regulation and smaller government.

This doesn’t sound like a couple of fascists.

mcphage · 24m ago
> seems to be consistently anti-war

…this is the guy who bombed Iran?

> to better represent the people

Do you just believe everything that people with power tell you?

ironmagma · 3h ago
When I first moved to the Bay Area, San Francisco was described by one person to me as "quite conservative actually." At the time, that seemed unlikely. However after a while, I can now see why this is the case.
PaulHoule · 3h ago
If you had much empathy for the downtrodden you couldn't stand to live at the epicenter of the homelessness crisis.
kcplate · 2h ago
I am not 100% sure that your implication really tracks with conservative behaviors. I would say it would be more likely that non-empathetic conservatives would work pretty relentlessly to relocate homeless out of their communities rather than just ignore and co-exist with it.

I am not saying they would solve it, but they would make it some other community's problem.

PaulHoule · 2h ago
I think it selects for people who don't care. Or maybe it is a warning that it could happen to you if you don't suck up to your brat boss.
OutOfHere · 2h ago
YES. Practically all posts to articles that -- legitimately expose the fascism AND gain sufficient attention -- are quickly flagged and deleted.
smitty1e · 3h ago
Noticing fascism and flatus are often associated with the source thereof.

When making an accusation, failure to include substantive facts is counter-productive.

jmclnx · 2h ago
I noticed that too, so I used this as a test case:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44588392

it hours to get it flagged where a Trump/Musk criticism gets flagged in a few minutes.

But it was flagged. I really really doubt HN is "pro-fascist", but I think it leans to the right because it is the rich that funds their projects.

tomhow · 2h ago
It's a misconception that most HN users are startup founders taking investor funds.

Most HN users are tech employees or freelancers on salaries or contractor fees, so whatever political slant HN has aligns with that.

Posts about the U.S. administration and tech celebrities get flagged because people try and submit them every day and they lead to repetitive flamewar discussions, which is everything that HN is trying to avoid.

moomoo11 · 3h ago
The VC and other capital allocator class stands to gain a LOT from the current administration.

I think after like 100M+ levels of wealth, "morals" and "ethics" go out the window.

p_ing · 3h ago
Historically the economy has largely done worse under Republican administrations; while individual VCs may gain something/a lot, overall they lose.
grimpy · 3h ago
This just means this with lots of capital can buy things for cheap. This is not a downside. Overall, they win.
PaulHoule · 3h ago
I'd argue it's the opposite. Look at contemporary Russia.

You can be on the margins and yell all you like and still be on the margins, they know it doesn't matter what you do. [1]

If you're an oligarch and get in the way you fall out of a window.

Jeff Bezos was no ally of Trump I, had he not been sitting behind Trump II at the inauguration he could have kissed all his rocket plans goodbye because all his permits and contracts could be canceled just like that.

[1] Being "marginal" is probably more blessing than curse in a lot of cases and a status you might want to retain.

PaulHoule · 3h ago
Outrage and anger are part of the problem not part of the solution.

Anti-fascists are jealous somebody has better footwear than them. Woke right NPCs who blog endlessly about "cancel culture" wish Karl Marx was banned 150 years ago.

If you read The Wall Street Journal or The Washington Post you'd think Zohran Mamdani has the opposite policies of Trump but he's twice as angry. He's dangerous to system not because he's angry but because he listens to people, something you'll see him do on YouTube or TikTok but that mainstream TV channels won't show you.

krapp · 1h ago
As a whole? No. But only because Hacker News is not a monolith, and there are many groups with various viewpoints here.

Are there pro-fascist posters here? Absolutely. I've seen full throated advocacy for some vile things here. The worst of it usually gets flagged.

Is there a strong correlation between flagging political posts and support for fascism? Not necessarily. Although some of that is definitely the HN Trumpist/right-wing contingent, this forum harbors a particular distate for anything not explicitly tech related (often beyond what the actual site guidelines state to be on topic) which includes politics of any kind.

And HN is designed so that flagging and downvoting has a much greater weight than upvoting, so it really doesn't even take much to tank a thread.

happytoexplain · 2h ago
There is a lot of fascist or fascist-adjacent behavior/opinions in the Trump/Musk crowd. Despite this, flagging Trump/Musk-critical articles doesn't make you fascist, and implying it does is an unnecessary provocation that only makes things worse and more bitter. A vicious cycle.