A person who performs in a porn movie has to be in at most one porn movie; they may or may not develop a personal brand.
An OnlyFans performer would be expected to develop a personal brand and get repeat customers.
kgwxd · 4h ago
Can't read the article but, on the surface it seems far less creepy than traditional porn. Can never be quite sure if everyone involved is there by choice, or if the money goes to the right people. I know there's already cases of abuse, but it seems a channel with a bit of history could more easily be judged accurately.
On one hand I think there were a lot of artistically bad things in porn that persisted because porn copied prior porn and was not in a conversation with consumers. For instance there used to be a lot of photos where the performer had an ugly scowl on their face [1] because... why? I can only imagine it's mimesis.
On the other hand, OnlyFans is like a gatcha game in that they make a lot of money from "whales" who spend thousands of dollars on performers which seems unhealthy to me.
A person who performs in a porn movie has to be in at most one porn movie; they may or may not develop a personal brand.
An OnlyFans performer would be expected to develop a personal brand and get repeat customers.
On one hand I think there were a lot of artistically bad things in porn that persisted because porn copied prior porn and was not in a conversation with consumers. For instance there used to be a lot of photos where the performer had an ugly scowl on their face [1] because... why? I can only imagine it's mimesis.
On the other hand, OnlyFans is like a gatcha game in that they make a lot of money from "whales" who spend thousands of dollars on performers which seems unhealthy to me.
[1] Particularly grotesque with heavy makeup.