The idea reminds me of how data -> information -> knowledge -> wisdom has been discussed for decades. INK feels like a rebrand of that chain, just trimmed. Not saying it's bad, just not sure what's actually new here
INKidea · 3h ago
Good point. Let me clarify what makes this different:
In an AI-saturated world, the distinctly human skillsets (sometimes dismissed as "soft") like critical thinking, empathy, creativity, cross-cultural awareness, aren’t just valuable, they're about to become essential differentiators across every industry.
INK positions insight as the uniquely human edge that remains scarce and valuable precisely because it’s tough for AI to authentically replicate (for now).
Curious if this resonates more clearly.
bell-cot · 2h ago
> In the era of AI, knowledge itself has become instant, infinite, and free.
Only if your philosophy equates AI hallucinations with actual truths.
EDIT, to add a trivial example of how shitty "AI" often is:
I just searched, in Google Shopping, for "shattered sword wwii midway". While watching, in other browser tabs, two different YouTube (also Google) videos about WWII and the Battle of Midway.
Anything remotely resembling "intelligence" should have been able to figure out that I wanted "Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway" by Jonathan Parshall and Anthony Tully - right? Especially since "Jon Parshall" was on-screen and labeled in one of the videos, while the host praised his and Tony's book.
Reality: Of Google Shopping's 6 "Researched With AI" recommendations, 3 were swords & sorcery fantasy novels. Even though Google "knows" I'm 100X more interested in history / WWII / navies than I am in fantasy novels.
Vs.: Without having my browser history, or my YouTube history, or the added " wwii midway" in the search string, the simplistic search function on my little local book store's web site did a better job of figuring out what I wanted to see.
INK positions insight as the uniquely human edge that remains scarce and valuable precisely because it’s tough for AI to authentically replicate (for now).
Curious if this resonates more clearly.
Only if your philosophy equates AI hallucinations with actual truths.
EDIT, to add a trivial example of how shitty "AI" often is:
I just searched, in Google Shopping, for "shattered sword wwii midway". While watching, in other browser tabs, two different YouTube (also Google) videos about WWII and the Battle of Midway.
Anything remotely resembling "intelligence" should have been able to figure out that I wanted "Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway" by Jonathan Parshall and Anthony Tully - right? Especially since "Jon Parshall" was on-screen and labeled in one of the videos, while the host praised his and Tony's book.
Reality: Of Google Shopping's 6 "Researched With AI" recommendations, 3 were swords & sorcery fantasy novels. Even though Google "knows" I'm 100X more interested in history / WWII / navies than I am in fantasy novels.
Vs.: Without having my browser history, or my YouTube history, or the added " wwii midway" in the search string, the simplistic search function on my little local book store's web site did a better job of figuring out what I wanted to see.