Marines mobilized in response to LA protests

62 sapphicsnail 35 6/9/2025, 10:21:09 PM cnn.com ↗

Comments (35)

hypeatei · 1h ago
Funny that the President mobilizing the U.S. military in response to riots is flagged here. We deserve what we get for voting him back in and ignoring stories like this. Shame.
jhanschoo · 1m ago
What news source calls these protests riots though?
awnird · 1h ago
Garry Tan and his colleagues spent a lot of money for this dictatorship.
spacemadness · 1h ago
HN is a public forum and is full of fascists unfortunately.
TheAlchemist · 47m ago
Yeah, people take democracy for granted.

As a result, we have people like Trump and Musk, both narcissists and sociopaths, at the White House.

Growing up, I dreamed about going to US, but was born on the wrong side of the Iron Curtain. As I got older and visited the country, it somewhat cooled my dreamed (Europe progressed dramatically in the meantime).

And now I feel a bit nostalgic and disoriented to be honest - what I once regarded as the country with the highest standards of ethics, integrity and rule of law, is unfortunately proving once again that no empire lasts forever. Of course it's a bit too soon as the US is still a superpower, but it definitely feels like the tide turned and really quickly.

legitster · 3h ago
Soldiers, especially Marines, are trained to follow orders and kill. They are not specialists in de-escalation or crowd control.

Here's hoping this is purely an optics play and they are only there to waste money and incite nationalism. Because if this escalates in any way and the US military turns on Americans, its hard to understate how bad things could get.

acdha · 1h ago
I’m not sure that’s true any more. I know a few vets and it was definitely thought-provoking to hear a Marine who’d been in the thick of Fallujah react to some police shooting by noting that they had stricter rules about use of force because the top brass wanted to get the Iraqi people on their side.
zzgo · 1h ago
I suspect that the current administration isn't concerned about winning the hearts and minds of Angelenos.
hypeatei · 1h ago
> Here's hoping this is purely an optics play and they are only there to waste money and incite nationalism

They don't deserve any benefit of the doubt at this point. Ask yourself what the MAGA reaction would've been to troops being deployed to their riot at the Capitol.

spacemadness · 1h ago
This is potentially the beginning of a civil war if troops fire. Hey moderates, how are you doing now? Still think it’s not fascism? Still need your eyes checked?
orwin · 1h ago
Your protests are tame: no fireworks, a few tyre fire lasting like a hour, no BF60s. On the org side, no water to kill tear gas grenades (I had a friend who used a Canadian lacrosse stick with a remote picker to send the package back, but most people use water buckets), no barbecue food or temporary toilets, some street docs but clearly not well organised, no muscle to keep the youngest/wildest from taking it too far (in my city it's often union dockers with the task, works wonders). Also, sunglasses or ski masks help not loosing eyes to flashballs aimed at the crowd.

Yet it's clear your police isn't trained for deascalation (or at all tbh), and have no idea of how a mobile defense works (that's a doctrinal issue, not an individual issue).

Kinda liked the 'shame, shame' chant though, very good idea, keep it up!

tdeck · 1h ago
When I Google BF60 I get a boat motor. What does it mean in this context?
WarOnPrivacy · 3h ago
Reminder that the authority under which the the US military is deployed against US citizens was intended to be used in exceptional (extreme) circumstances - ostensibly because no other options would suffice.

    The Insurrection Act authorizes the president to deploy 
    military forces inside the United States to suppress rebellion
    or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations.

    The statute implements Congress’s authority under the Constitution
    to "provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of
    the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions." 

    It is the primary exception to the Posse Comitatus Act,
    under which federal military forces are generally barred
    from participating in civilian law enforcement activities.
ref: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/insu...

This is the heaviest hammer in the toolbox. Deploying it against citizens he doesn't like because he resents their message is a historical display of bad character and is profoundly unethical in a way that the harshest adjectives struggle to reflect.

crises-luff-6b · 3h ago
Here's the actual text[1], it's pretty clear. Californians are reportedly preventing POTUS/DHS from enforcing US immigration laws. POTUS/DHS is being prevented from free movement, from entering or leaving their offices, and a host of other encroachments and interferences. Californians are just in the wrong here..

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/12406

WarOnPrivacy · 1h ago
> Here's the actual text[1], it's pretty clear.

There's nothing in the text that suggests it is appropriate to preemptively deploy US military in response to protests, not even because the administration deems protestors to be enemies.

Narratives in support of preemptively deploying the military against protesters are all crafted justifications, each built after the act has been decided on.

What's left to for apologists to do is to choose whether to own the methods and intentions or mirror the administration's disingeniousness.

locopati · 2h ago
Do you approve of the way ICE is going about their business? What I see is Gestapo-like behavior that deserves protest, which is being responded to with unnecessarily violent force by ICE.
spacemadness · 1h ago
It’s pretty clear you’re a fascist if you think this.
jleyank · 3h ago
Let’s just hope Neil doesn’t have to update his lyrics. But, given as that’s probably the point of the exercise…
crmd · 3h ago
I worry that, rather than de-escalation, one of the White House’s explicit goals here is to stage manage a Kent State-like demonstration of state force against left-wing activists that spreads to other cities. I sincerely hope I’m cynically wrong here.
spacemadness · 1h ago
It’s been pretty obvious from their behavior and rhetoric since the beginning. It’s not cynicism.
sh34r · 1h ago
Maybe TACO wants another Kent State, but that’s not how this will go down. The hippies didn’t want to go to war, it was kinda their whole thing. It’s not a pacifist mood out there. At all. Unarmed dudes are out there chasing Jan 6 terrorists in Temu tacticool gear, practically daring them to shoot.

I think the analogy will be more akin to Bloody Sunday, a hideous massacre denounced across the globe that sparks a 25 year long insurgency against an illegitimate monarch, the occupation, and the loyalist WASP paramilitaries who kept disappearing Catholic minorities. Yeah… if you don’t think those old world sectarian hatreds don’t still fester under the surface, you’re not paying attention.

Imagine if the Provos had FPV drones, ransomware as a service, and 3D printed rocket launchers. The future is gonna suck.

perihelions · 3h ago
You're not cynical; it's his plain, revealed character. He's been openly fantasizing about soldiers shooting protestors for years. He's asked his own defense secretary if he could do it for him,

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/09/1097517470/trump-esper-book-d... ("Former Pentagon chief Esper says Trump asked about shooting protesters")

DFHippie · 3h ago
The gulf between what is going on in the world and what makes it to the front page of Hacker News is growing ever vaster.
gnabgib · 3h ago
Related:

Trump deploys National Guard as Los Angeles protests against immigration agents (105 points, 2 days ago, 50 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44214230

The National Guard Deployment in LA Is a Threat to Democracy (15 points, 7 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44230137

(Although you'd think 2000 National Guard troops would be enough without the 700 Marines)

woodruffw · 3h ago
I don't think it's about the numbers at all -- he's seeing whether anybody will stop him from nakedly violating posse comitatus[1].

The President can of course dispatch the military for domestic law enforcement, but to do so he needs to establish a legal exception, like the Insurrection Act. That hasn't happened yet.

[1]: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/poss...

crises-luff-6b · 3h ago
The text is simple: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/12406

POTUS is well within the offices' authority to do it. Dems are openly bragging they are interfering with DHS/ICE operations..

woodruffw · 2h ago
The text is indeed simple, and directly contradicts the President’s authority here:

> Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.

To surpass that, the president must declare an insurrection. But he’s done no such thing, since such a claim is nakedly indefensible.

(This justification of course only applies to the national guard. The federal armed forces have even stronger guardrails.)

maxerickson · 3h ago
That's about deploying National Guard troops, not about deploying US Marines.
mac3n · 3h ago
he's hoping for a Kent State replay, using troops that aren't trained for police duty
sh34r · 3h ago
I wonder how many civilians will be disappeared before a Dem governor finds their balls and musters the state militia. There’s millions of patriots out there just waiting for the call to action. This nonviolent shit will get you killed. MLK was a gun owner.

If that kind of talk worries you, consider how much uglier it will be when the good people of LA form unregulated militias instead. Do you really want to see Ruby Ridge 2: Rooftop Korean boogaloo?

tdeck · 1h ago
Newsom is too busy performatively harming homeless people and platforming fascists on his podcast to cook up anything like this.