Ask HN: Do you use social listening tools to aggregate news?
1 points by pinter69 13m ago 0 comments
Should You Reverse Any Advice You Hear? (slatestarcodex.com)
1 points by jstanley 42m ago 0 comments
Ask HN: Is anyone still programming the old-fashioned way (without LLMs)?
9 philbo 7 6/9/2025, 8:39:01 AM
There's so much content about AI-assisted programming now that I'm genuinely curious to hear from people who aren't using LLMs in their regular workflow.
I've tried Cursor and Claude Code and have seen them both do some impressive things, but using them really sucks the joy out of programming for me. I like the process of thinking about and implementing stuff without them. I enjoy actually typing the code out myself and feel like that helps me to hold a better mental model of how stuff works in my head. And when I have used LLMs, I've felt uncomfortable about the distance they put between me and the code, like they get in the way of deeper understanding.
So I continue to work on my projects the old-fashioned way, just me and vim, hacking stuff at my own pace. Is anyone else like this? Am I a dinosaur? And is there some trick for the mental model problem with LLMs?
Coding agents still give you control (at least for now), but are like having really good autocomplete. Instead of using copilot to complete a line or two, using something like Cursor you can generate a whole function or class based on your spec then you can refine and tweak the more nuanced and important bits where necessary.
For example, I was doing some UI stuff the other day and in the past it would have taken a while just to get a basic page layout together when you're writing it yourself, but with a coding assistant I generated a basic page asking it to use an image mock up, a component library and some other pages as references. Then I could get on and do the fun bits of building the more novel parts of the UI.
I mean if it's code you're working on for fun then work however you like, but I don't know why someone would employ a dev working in such an inefficient way in 2025.