Maybe LLMs and their reasoning could be used as a model for how a consensus is reached in a group.
vouaobrasil · 3h ago
What an odd question – math is not an experimental science in the sense that experiments are required to demonstrate validity. They are required to suggest phenomenon, but the only evidence accepted in math is logical argument, which in principal can and must be replicated by those reading the paper.
This reminds me of a bunch of recent posts on HN about AI and its "reasoning" process.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44052713
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43673463
An interesting read and take on math papers.
[edit] adding another thought
Maybe LLMs and their reasoning could be used as a model for how a consensus is reached in a group.