We’ll be ending web hosting for your apps on Glitch

51 js4ever 30 5/22/2025, 5:16:25 PM blog.glitch.com ↗

Comments (30)

biker142541 · 41m ago
Just coming to say this is a great example of how communication should be done for such changes. So many companies get this wrong, but this is thoughtful and to the point. Glitch was a springboard for myself as well, so very bittersweet (and I guess I need to migrate really old stuff... but to their point, this is super easy now).
weiliddat · 1h ago
Sad, one of the first of its kind. Created a bunch of one-off tools for friends and colleagues on glitch, but could see why it didn't really take off. For me I switched to other platforms like codesandbox, replit because the editor UX wasn't great for a long time. I get wanting the simplicity angle but having poor hints/autocomplete/etc is a hard sell for writing code.
DannyPage · 4h ago
I really enjoyed using Glitch as it allowed me to quickly publish and iterate on various experiments or try out new libraries like Datasette or HTMX.

I am curious what Glitch will look like after July. If they aren’t hosting apps, will they still be hosting code and letting it deploy elsewhere? It says it’s not a full shutdown, but it doesn’t appear to say what will be left to do on Glitch after that date.

drewda · 55m ago
Glitch was acquired by Fastly a few years ago, so perhaps the user-facing brand will continue on for a while on top of some Fastly hosted services...
steivan · 4h ago
I've been a long-time Glitch user and am now looking for good alternative platforms. My primary use case involves online coding with a Node.js backend using Express and some React apps. If anyone has recommendations, I'd greatly appreciate it.
weiliddat · 1h ago
Is it more small temporary projects you need to make and throw away, or large projects you keep working on?
andrewmcwatters · 1h ago
...are you averse to just doing this stuff over a cheap VPS? Here's an affiliate link if you're interested.

    1 GB RAM KVM VPS
    1x vCPU Core
    1 GB RAM
    20 GB SSD
    2 TB Bandwidth
    Price: $10.96/Year
https://my.racknerd.com/aff.php?aff=2502&pid=912

I don't work for Racknerd, but my business uses them for our clients. Most of them have low-end requirements. I mean that's less than $1/month right there.

ignoramous · 1h ago

  2 TB Bandwidth
That's 2TB/mo. Pretty sweet deal for $10/yr.
mschuster91 · 1h ago
The problem is, having a server on the internet is painful because you have to be constantly on guard for patches - if not you'll get hacked sooner than later.
barnabee · 1h ago
Debian with unattended-upgrades and a [weekly] scheduled restart has worked for me for a long time.
andrewmcwatters · 33m ago
What?
sabellito · 1h ago
Wait what, 11 USD per YEAR? How.
h4ck_th3_pl4n3t · 22m ago
https://lowendbox.com/

Lowendbox has lots of cheap shared VPS providers. For small projects that's all you need.

LordShredda · 2h ago
I'd recommend, unfortunately, buying a cheap $200 netbook and running cloudflare tunnel on it. As long as you're relying on other people's computers for hosting you'll keep looking forever
barnabee · 1h ago
My vote for doing this is to get a second hand Lenovo/HP/Dell mini pc.

They're cheap (thanks to corporate upgrade cycles and the sheer number of "obsolete" models that are out there on eBay et al.), quiet, reliable, low power consumption, and generally pretty capable for the money.

lxgr · 1h ago
> As long as you're relying on other people's computers for hosting you'll keep looking forever

> running cloudflare tunnel

There's some irony here.

CharlesW · 1h ago
The Cloudflare dependency is for networking, not hosting. It would be very impressive to see a self-hosted service available over the internet without introducing a 3rd-party dependency or two.
lxgr · 1h ago
Yes, but my point is that there are many web hosting services, but only very few such proxy services to my knowledge. (Tailscale is another great option if you don't need public reachability.)

I don't think it's a great tradeoff, when optimizing for independence of specialized solutions at least.

CharlesW · 1h ago
Sorry, yes —¹ I was just gently poking you about the idea of self-hosting outside of one's local network without many 3rd-parties involved.

BTW, Tailscale Funnel²³ (in beta) does provide public reachability! ² https://tailscale.com/kb/1223/funnel ³ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpxmfpCl20c ¹ Please enjoy this hand-typed em-dash.

lxgr · 47m ago
Oh, nice, I vaguely remembered them doing something in that area but forgot about the details. Thanks for the reminder and the artisanal typography :)
dec0dedab0de · 49m ago
has the internet really changed that much?
lxgr · 45m ago
Generally, I'd say so – life behind CG-NATs can be hard for non-eyeballs.

But fortunately IPv6 is maybe finally happening, which solves much of the NAT problems, and in the meantime there's clever things like Tailscale.

andrewmcwatters · 1h ago
That's nearly 20 years of lowendbox provider annual payments for what this guy is asking for.
ignoramous · 1h ago
Workloads allowing, sub £50 SBCs like Banana Pi might do?
duck · 1h ago
Why is Glitch and Pocket both shutting down the same day and announcing today?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44063662

42lux · 1h ago
Someone is looking for coin and doesn't find it.
curiouser3 · 1h ago
glitch.com brings back memories of the pre-slack era Glitch MMO. What an amazing time that was, really beautiful game made by talented people, pivoted the communication side into what we now know as Slack
daveguy · 35m ago
This is excellent communication and respect for their users. Applause for Glitch. Especially allowing users to retrieve resources for a full 6 months after the closure.

If you appreciate this level of communication and respect, avoid Digital Ocean at all cost. They will fail to send you emails for a few weeks and then delete your resources permanently with no recourse. They are the literal opposite of Glitch. Avoid Digital Ocean.

I would recommend Glitch remove Digital Ocean from their list of alternatives.

busymom0 · 4h ago
As someone who had never heard of them, can someone explain what Glitch was used for?
js4ever · 4h ago
It was a platform to create / edit / host frontend and node.js backend. It was popular because it was an easy and free way to deploy something on a playground.

When it went out I was super impressed, but they failed to monetize it and got badly abused by bad actors