> I've long maintained that the threat from AI to workers isn't that AI can do your job – it's that an AI salesman can convince your boss to fire you and replace you with an AI that can't do your job:
This post is on to something.
cosmicgadget · 2h ago
In theory that should sort itself out in the end.
cosmicgadget · 3h ago
So obviously a technology to get a specific person to buy a specific thing at a specific time isn't going to happen. But the last ten years has taught me two things:
Many social media users are gullible enough to be convinced to act irrationally.
A well-trained AI on great data (which Facebook has) is pretty good at sorting signal from noise, i.e. advertisements that would or would not appeal to a particular user.
chuckadams · 4h ago
That is some wonderfully gonzo writing style, and brings the receipts with lots of links. Bravo.
bwfan123 · 4h ago
What i would like to know is my digital footprint in the form of cookies that google and meta have access to. That digital image is a form of mental projection, and I presume meta's AI can target ads to that image.
Recommendations in the form of ads targeted to humans is a perfect usecase for LLMs. There is no right answer, and the interpreter is a human. Hallucinations dont matter, and if the targeting is a tad bit better, that justifies the investment.
K0balt · 3h ago
I think the key feature of AI driven exploitation of cognitive flaws for the purpose of influencing people is the ability to remove any trace of hesitation or empathy from the process. Ai can adhere to the letter of ethical behaviour but remain blind to the the human consequences of manipulating a society into believing untruths and basing their resource choices on these lies about worth, beauty, desire, safety, or prosperity. This enables the zuckstrocity to turn up the cognitive dissonance up to eleven without creating an internal army of dissension and whistleblowers.
throw7 · 3h ago
Has the Zuck been talking with Scott Adams?
belter · 4h ago
Yes I can feel the mind-control...This post give me an irresistible urge to close my non existing Facebook account. :-)
SirFatty · 4h ago
It's funny... every story I read about Meta or FB makes be glad I deleted my account ten years ago. None of the articles ever leave me with FOMO.
zingababba · 3h ago
Sometimes I watch people 'use' Facebook. It's just endless scrolling...pause to watch a 10 second video...scroll...pause to click thumbs up...scroll...ad infinitum. Modern Facebook is hell.
kvark · 3h ago
Oh irony. The article talks about exaggerated attention to success of individuals, like Zuck, being an issue in Silicon Valley. And yet the article itself talks about this AI Ad direction as something invented by evil Zuck.
This isn't really about Zuck. Ultra-convincing ads will happen soon regardless of what Zuck does.
snkzxbs · 3h ago
> a tool for nonconsensually rating the fuckability of Harvard undergrads
Am I supposed to ask for permission when I talk to my friends about how attractive I think people of the opposite sex are?
jplusequalt · 3h ago
Posting photos of people on a website so that random strangers can assign numbers to their appearance is not the same as discussing who you find attractive in private.
I'm confused how you would even come to compare these two scenarios?
This post is on to something.
Many social media users are gullible enough to be convinced to act irrationally.
A well-trained AI on great data (which Facebook has) is pretty good at sorting signal from noise, i.e. advertisements that would or would not appeal to a particular user.
Recommendations in the form of ads targeted to humans is a perfect usecase for LLMs. There is no right answer, and the interpreter is a human. Hallucinations dont matter, and if the targeting is a tad bit better, that justifies the investment.
Am I supposed to ask for permission when I talk to my friends about how attractive I think people of the opposite sex are?
I'm confused how you would even come to compare these two scenarios?