> “Some important points are that it would not be pollution-free. Coal is still very dirty,” said Baker, conceding that perhaps the pollution would no longer be airborne, but “water and soil would still be at risk.”
Not emission free as I am reading it.
Still, if economically viable at reducing amount of CO2 released not effectively terrible as it extends the life of existing infrastructure to ease transition to replacement.
Not emission free as I am reading it.
Still, if economically viable at reducing amount of CO2 released not effectively terrible as it extends the life of existing infrastructure to ease transition to replacement.