There Goes the American Muscle Car

46 pluripote 146 8/28/2025, 9:02:28 PM thedispatch.com ↗
https://web.archive.org/web/20250828210304/https://thedispatch.com/article/dodge-challenger-muscle-cars/

https://archive.ph/DEtKt

Comments (146)

Animats · 2h ago
Classic muscle cars are obsolete. Most cars today have 0-60 times a 1970s Dodge Challenger could only dream of.[1] Plus, they can now go around corners.

Here's an old movie: "Hot Rod Girl" (1956) [2] The opening scenes are of a real drag strip in Southern California. Technical advice from the San Fernando Drag Strip and the National Hot Rod Association. Accelerations are so low that those things would be obstructing traffic on a freeway onramp today.

[1] https://www.0-60specs.com/dodge/challenger-0-60-times

[2] https://archive.org/details/hot_rod_girl_1956

dingaling · 57m ago
Acceleration times say nothing about the character of a car.

Anyone can launch a Model S or Taycan at insane accelerations just by pushing a pedal and letting the computer sort things out.

Trying to do so in a 1970s Camaro or a 1980s Sierra XR4 requires skill and practice whilst listening to the howl of the engine, feeling the texture of the road through the steering and sensing the suspension loading-up. All of that has been lost.

Driving has been reduced to an ordeal to be ensured with as little interaction with the vehicle as possible.

Gud · 26m ago
The point of a vehicle was always to take you from point a to point b.

Perhaps a certain minority enjoys pushing buttons, pulling levers and pressing pedals to move your butt around, heck I enjoy it too.

But when I am leaving for work at 5:30AM I am much happier to be seated comfortably in a train and letting someone else move me around while I take a nap

lagniappe · 38m ago
There's just something spiritual about the rumble and cadence of a cammed muscle car..
CamperBob2 · 1h ago
Dig those Dekatrons!
downrightmike · 2h ago
You can still have one today, but its a Sunday driver for sure
RatchetWerks · 9h ago
As a die hard car enthusiast. This makes perfect sense.

We are going through a culture change in society.

Many younger kids don’t view cars as the gateway to freedom and coming of age experiences. (Which is fine)

Combined with the brutal performance of modern EV cars. Muscle cars seem like a waste of time/energy/money/complexity. Logically it makes no sense.

I’m currently going through an identity crisis (as a gearhead) as a result of this.

firecall · 1h ago
> I’m currently going through an identity crisis (as a gearhead) as a result of this.

I view it as much like having an appreciation of Steam Trains and older aircraft!

Still interesting and the best are machines worthy of our ongoing attention.

FWIW I own an old Porsche 911 and an alarmingly fast EV.

I love them both.

When I get back in to the old 911, I think to myself, how the bloody hell was this even legal! It feels dangerous and exciting all at the same time. It's an event every time I turn the key and it starts making noises and the gauges spring into life and lights and switches start glowing. Then you turn the key from a cold start and listen to the sound, and you get to know exactly the state of tune. You dont even need to drive it very fast or very far and it makes you feel alive in a way my EV never does!

Now when I get in and drive my EV, it works in an astonishingly safe and effective way every time. When you stamp on the accelerator it will immediately rocket forwards in a way that makes the occupants of the car feel sick LOL

The acceleration in an EV tapers off, whereas in an older performance cat the performance builds in a more exciting way I think.

But as I say, it's like being a Steam Train enthusiast. They are what they are, from a time when they did what they did.

m463 · 46m ago
> The acceleration in an EV tapers off, whereas in an older performance cat the performance builds in a more exciting way I think.

I think this might be like the yamaha v-max motorcycle. It wasn't as fast as other motorcycles, but the way the throttle opened up at a certain rpm range made the boost seem exciting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_VMAX#V-Boost

anonymousiam · 20m ago
Ferraris are the same way. They've got an incredible top end that no EV will ever match.
PaulHoule · 9h ago
Don't forgot to lay some of the blame on trucks, SUVs, and the chicken tax. [1] American car manufacturers aren't interested in making anything that can't be classified as a "light truck" because then they'd have to compete on a level playing field with foreign brands. So every kind of "car" has disappeared.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax

twoWhlsGud · 9h ago
This. If you are completely surrounded by light trucks as you grow up, then you are much less likely to ever think of actual cars (muscle or otherwise) at all. I grew up around 2000 lbs BMW 2002's (and the like) - a kind of vehicle that simply has vanished. So I could imagine lightweight sport sedans as a thing. If all you know are SUV's your concept of vehicle is going to be very different...
PaulHoule · 9h ago
Auto journalists keep repeating in the same deadpan voice as the brainwashed soldiers from The Manchurian Candidate that Americans exclusively want big vehicles. It's not that there isn't some truth in that but the real truth is that (a) the publications won't get any chance to review vehicles if they don't toe the line [1] and (b) since the 1970s if you went to an American car dealer trying to buy a size S car they would try to sell you an L, looking for a size L they would try to sell you an XXL, etc. I remember going to car dealerships with my dad, there was a brief moment after the 2008 financial crisis that this wasn't the case, but by 2015 the major Japanese brands of Honda and Toyota were doing the same.

[1] One take on the fall of Intel was that they were "high on their own supply" for the last 15 years and journalists were too intimidated to tell them they were wrong with the exception of Charlie Demerjian

wombatpm · 4h ago
But the vehicles today are dumb big.

My second car was a 1978 Buick Riviera. 17.5 feet in length, two doors, rear wheel drive, 403cuin 8 cylinder. It weighs in at 3500 lbs, had 15 mph rated bumpers with shocks attached to the frame. Steel roll cage, double steel doors.

The car was a beast. You could fit 7 adults in the car and two dead bodies in the trunk.

My grandmother was t-boned in it. They straightened the door and replaced the glass and it was good as new.

That was a big car!

I wish I could buy a car like that with modern antilock brakes, transmission. Instead it’s all trucks and SUVs because people like my mother feel “safer” and like seeing from up high.

Look at the specs of a modern vehicle. Any contact over 5mph and you are replacing the plastic bumper. Actually have an airbag go off and you are probably looking at a totaled vehicle.

kelnos · 3h ago
That really took me back. In the 80s my mom drove a mid-70s, 2-door Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme. Itt was just under 17 feet long, also two doors, and I believe rear-wheel drive, with a fairly large engine. If memory serves (sigh, it often doesn't), my mom even called it "the beast". I laughed out loud at your "two dead bodies in the trunk" -- yup, checks out.

I'm torn, though, on your idea to have a car like that with modern (safety) features. I hate all the trucks and SUVs out on the road, and I drive a mid-sized sedan. And I agree with you on how easy it is to damage that car. But man those old cars were so heavy. I can't imagine getting decent gas mileage (or good BEV range) on one today.

seanmcdirmid · 6h ago
Toyota, Honda, Kia, Nissan make plenty of trucks in the USA, they get around the chicken tax directly. The move to trucks and SUVs seems to be more about consumer sentiment that I can't really understand (I'm a big fan of sedans), it isn't just some hack around the tax system.
eptcyka · 1h ago
There’s a floor on how cheap a vehicle can be made to conform to the current safety and fuel economy requirements, the margin is greater for more expensive cars. Manufacturers are incentivising bigger cars.
eldaisfish · 5h ago
it is profit for auto makers, not consumer sentiment. larger vehicles have larger price tags and larger profit margins.

Remember that the US auto companies spent billions of dollars in marketing and lying to people that they "need" vehicles the size of tanks.

harimau777 · 4h ago
Isn't some of it an arms race? I partially have a large vehicle because it's unsafe to be in a small vehicle if I get in a crash with a truck or EV.
PaulHoule · 4h ago
They make people think that.

The fact is that modern cars have astonishingly effective safety features that are likely to get you alive out of most crashes regardless of the size of your vehicle. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety publishes data that shows that larger vehicles are safer but it is not like you die in the smaller car most of the time, but rather you are more likely to break your ankle or something.

If your vehicle goes under the tractor pulled by a semi (any size) or if it flips over the guardrail because it's too big to be held by the guardrail you do die.

crooked-v · 2h ago
See also: the excellent safety ratings of the Miata, even though it's the smallest car you can get short of Smart or imported kei trucks.
hnthroay22312 · 3h ago
but larger vehicles also flip easier, so i'm not sure until we have some scientific paper about this.
murderfs · 4h ago
People want vehicles the size of tanks. Auto companies are spending billions of dollars to get people to buy their respective tank-sized vehicles, not to turn people onto the segment in general.
PaulHoule · 4h ago
I've heard people say "people want vehicles the size of tanks" in discussions like this but I've never heard "I want a vehicle the size of a tank" although that person exists.

It seems like a different world but before the pandemic if you wanted to buy a compact car you would go to the dealer and find out they don't have any new ones, you'll have to settle for used, they say factory washed out in a flood. Well they have 100 SUVs made in the same factory lined up that nobody wants to buy that are $7000 off.

murderfs · 2h ago
From a survey of Canadians in 2022 [1]: "We find that SUV drivers view their vehicles as functionally superior to smaller cars in terms of safety, space for lifestyle, handling, and fun. Symbolically, SUVs are seen as a “status symbol” that can communicate a number of images, such as being “successful”. SUV drivers are more likely to see these vehicles as common and “approved” in their social networks, and tend to downplay any negative societal impacts such as increased GHG emissions. Across respondents intending to buy an SUV, willingness-to-downsize to a smaller vehicle was highest under financial incentives (for buying or using a car) or disincentives (for buying or using an SUV)."

I personally don't understand how you could consider an SUV better for handling or fun, but denying people's views doesn't make them not hold them.

1: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S22146...

dfee · 1h ago
> I personally don't understand how you could consider an SUV better for handling or fun

This is an imagination problem. There are certain categories of automotive use cases which SUVs are designed to be superior. In those, being in a vehicle designed to handle better at the task is better fun!

For example, taking an SUV off road.

dfee · 2h ago
I want a vehicle the size of a tank.

Or at least, a vehicle the size of a Hummer H1. But, would be willing to try out a Marauder, because they look like they’re a blast.

I had tiny sports cars growing from 16-30 years old. They were fun in a different way.

1. https://www.topgear.com/car-news/modified/behold-500bhp-295k...

2. https://www.motor1.com/news/27190/marauder-armored-vehicle-f...

vostok · 3h ago
As someone who lives in a city, I'm not sure what I'd do with a car that is smaller than a tank. If it's a small car then it's probably for local trips and super inconvenient to park / re-park / etc. I want a big car to comfortably fit my family, our outdoor toys, and maybe even tow something.

Even if I lived outside a city, what do I gain by driving a smaller car? Going from 35 to 55 mpg? Parking is plentiful and equally convenient for big cars these days.

kanbara · 51m ago
meanwhile the entire world from japan to the uk to brazil to south africa are fine to go grocery shopping and take their family out in their normal sized car. in the city.

cities are better with fewer cars and better public transit. and you dont need a tank. i didnt know your viewpoint even existed.

hnthroay22312 · 2h ago
most people want all those things but reality they tow something maybe once a year, that's marketing working.
kelnos · 3h ago
Do they actually want that, or have people been influenced by incessant marketing? Car manufacturers have strong tax reasons to prefer building SUVs over sedans, and their marketing reflects that.
mc32 · 4h ago
People with families have been fooling around with larger vehicles for some time: station wagons -> minivans -> SUVs -> CUVs. It's not new.
riffraff · 1h ago
Most of the time people drive SUVs alone.

I go for walks in the morning and there's a road bottleneck and it's hilarious and sad to see the cars queueing up on both sides, huge ones, with a single person in them, every morning.

I do own a station wagon, and it's shorter than most SUVs, and I use it for long trips, but let's be realistic, that's not what most drives are.

lotsofpulp · 4h ago
No one forced people to buy the larger vehicles when they came on the market. People choose to buy vehicles that let them sit higher and take up more space, when smaller alternatives are readily available.

No comments yet

Balgair · 6h ago
As a former gear head there is also the perception issue.

Look, no way about it, most of the drivers of muscle cars today are grey headed old men. They're the only ones that can afford them.

The next big demo for muscle cars is via exorbitant leases that select for idiots. Which yeah, now we're talking younger men with testosterone, at least.

Being an old man now too, I'm fairly certain that dumb testosterone laden guys with a loud and fast car are still gonna get the girls, but I can't be 100 on that anymore.

Still thats the next demo down. It's mostly old farts on Harleys and in Mustangs (unless you're near Paris Island or San Diego, of course)

heresie-dabord · 6m ago
> grey headed old men. They're the only ones that can afford them.

Yes, the economics have changed. And so has scalability.

For today's young adults, vehicle cost and total cost of ownership have made ownership of private vehicles another "shining artifact of the past." [0]

But you know what else? Populated cities have dense traffic. Racing with full acceleration to reach the next intersection's red light is obviously futile.

People are more worried about having a roof and four walls.

[0] to quote L. Cohen

georgeecollins · 2h ago
Another big problem is that performance is so much better than it was in the golden age of muscle cars. Lots of BMWs and Civics today would blow off the fastest car imaginable in '68-70. Of course the latest muscle cars also improved, with engines that are like 400- 1000 hp (really just that Charger, but a teen in my neighborhood has one).

That's just really a dangerous amount of power for a daily driver. A lot of electric drivers don't realize how much the potential power is taken down in daily driving to keep it safe. But Camaro LT's have a sport mode where the backend can get loose with just a squirt of acceleration.

Cars like that are insane. It's just not safe to drive cars like that on city street anywhere near their potential.

fallous · 1h ago
A muscle car is as much a visceral experience as it is a means of transportation, and never under-sell the fun of driving a slow car fast. Modern cars are sensory deprivation chambers that turn the joy of driving into the tedium of transporting oneself from one place to another.

We're decades past the time when a 1960s car was remotely competitive on any measurable aspect of performance but, just as rock climbing is not a valid competitor for taking a train/ski lift/whatever to the top of a mountain, there will always be those that revel in the joy of doing something that calls to our more primitive selves.

Muscle cars are the essence of being young... they're unreasonable, loud, reckless, and beautiful.

DamnInteresting · 2h ago
As a former gearhead, I must say that an EV with get-up-and-go has been worth the tradeoff for me. Sure, I miss the roar of the V8, and the manual shifting. But the instant torque of an EV is so satisfying, and the low center of gravity is fun to toss around. And I don't miss all of the gas station stops, oil changes, transmission fluid changes, fouled sensors, overheating, spark plug changes, clutch replacement, brake pad changes, dripping fluids, fumes, shouted conversations with friends over the engine noise, et cetera.
georgeecollins · 2h ago
I understand so completely! I am not old enough for muscle cars, but I liked cars that were big as I was growing up. Like I had an old 944 (loved that) an early WRX, a Mark Vii GTI-- all manuals. I realized my favorite cars were manuals with rear wheel drive.

During the pandemic I got a Camaro convertible with a manual. I love that car but it is hard to defend on functional grounds. A Tesla plaid will blow it off on the line. There are a lot of cars that are ten times more functional that are as good or better on the track.

I have kids who don't care about cars, took their time getting their driver license. As someone who grew up California I can't understand that. But cars allowed me to do things they can do without cars. And they live in an objectively safer and more stressful world, so I can see why they don't want to add driving to it.

Here's what I like about what I drive. It's fun, silly and orange. People look at it and know I like my car but they don't think I am rich dude with a fancy Porsche or Mercedes. All kinds of very pedestrian cars are faster, but I live in Los Angeles and I get to enjoy the weather.

RajT88 · 1h ago
I'm not a gearhead, but a car admirer. Bought my first fun car recently (a 2001 MR2 Spyder - probably my last fun car).

I think we're a long way off self-driving cars in earnest, but we're in the shorter term leaving behind the idea of cars as something where their performance in some way correlates with social status. As hard as you try, you can't deny that element is there for gearheads and tuners - it's writ large across the Fast film franchise.

hervature · 9h ago
> I’m currently going through an identity crisis (as a gearhead) as a result of this.

I would challenge you that it is your proclivity for logic that is causing your identity crisis. If you enjoy a certain aesthetic, the pursuit of that aesthetic is reason enough. You are already putting constraints on the concept of a car because strapping a rocket on wheels with wings is going to have much more performance than an EV. Redefine your pursuit to be the most performant muscle car and everything is squared. No identity crisis needed.

RatchetWerks · 8h ago
You are perfectly correct.

I’m morphing love of modifying cars away from performance numbers but into a way to build mechanical art and enjoy emotional moments with other humans.

I’ve realized that was the whole point all along. EV or IC it doesn’t matter. Just the statements above

ismokedoinks · 9h ago
The kids yearn for JDMs
platevoltage · 3h ago
Do they? It seems like its the 30/40 somethings that yearned for the JDMs back when we were young, who are the ones still yearning for the JDMs.
djmips · 1h ago
Then you can be an old man gently oiling the steam engine at the museum you volunteer for.
rconti · 8h ago
Even outside of EVs, cars have gotten to the point where you're barely driving them anymore, anyway, you're more of a "human in the loop". You can't really see out of them anymore (other than the windshield, of course), so most people have stopped trying and just rely on the "systems".

* Don't change lanes if the blinky light on your side mirrors tells you not to

* Don't back up unless the image in the backup camera tells you it's safe

* Stop reversing when the beeping from the park distance sensors get too insistent

* AEB, lane departure warning, rear traffic assist radar, etc.

Don't get me wrong, people have used this "old man yells at cloud" point of view to call "real cars" dead for many decades; fuel injection, ABS, automatic transmissions, whatever. But we've definitely gotten to a tipping point where most of the fun is gone.

I'm not saying we should go back to x% more deaths per year by getting rid of XYZ nanny system, I'm just saying car enthusiasm is largely dead in new cars.

mingus88 · 6h ago
And good riddance?

Car culture has killed livable cities and I am not going to miss loud and obnoxious cruisers playing games on public roads

dingaling · 1h ago
I don't think that the new era of 'EV appliance culture' will have any positive impact on urban planning compared to 'car culture'.

There are more vehicles on the roads than ever before, and each of those distracted travellers demands a direct route from home to destination whether they're driving or being driven by a robo-taxi.

random31181 · 18m ago
I assure you there would be a lot less life in the city if you lived and died in the same village you were born in, like most people through history.
platevoltage · 3h ago
Seriously. I've had more fun on my bicycle than I ever did during my car phase.
heresie-dabord · 31s ago
Agreed. And e-bikes are not just practical now, they are actually a thrill when climbing hills.
rconti · 3h ago
Doesn't have to be just a phase, I love both!
georgeecollins · 2h ago
Bike rack on my Camaro! But I am fine with car culture passing, it makes sense.
m463 · 40m ago
> you're barely driving them anymore

It's worse with tesla - the Plaid has removed most driver controls.

If you're a car guy and buy a 1000hp+ vehicle, I think you would want a drive select or turn signal stalk.

You can't flash your lights. wipers are not under your control. if you're sticking out into traffic, you don't know if the car will guess correctly that you want to back up... or pull out. nonsense.

gmueckl · 1h ago
If you want a "raw" driving experience, you need to go on a race track in a "proper" race car. I use the quotes because you could come up with very diffferent definitions for them depending on your particular perspective. Amateur car races are a thing, btw.

I'm glad that all these assistants exist for road vehicles. I think of myself as a fairly disciplined driver (welly who am I kidding, really?), but these systems have saved my bacon more than once over the years.

pstuart · 9h ago
I think there will always be a desire for the "vroom vroom" factor, as well as the ability to work on it without an EE degree.

I don't think it's ever been logical but it ticks important emotional boxes so that makes sense.

I'm old and I drive a refurb'd Leaf and have never ever cared that my vehicle was not sexy. I've never been "normal" so never had the appeal but I understand it.

stavros · 9h ago
I agree, like there's always been a desire for a well-groomed horse.
arjie · 9h ago
A 2023 Dodge Charger GT V6 does 0-60 in 6.4 s

My 2018 Subaru Forester does 0-60 in 6.3 s

Imagine you're getting smoked by a 7 year old dad-mobile with paddle shifters. And I'm not even running a Cobb tune. That isn't a muscle car. That's a synthol car.

https://www.burnsmotors.com/cdjr-research/dodge-charger-0-60...

MSFT_Edging · 9h ago
The Charger GT is essentially the rental-spec charger. Not a great comparison.

Besides, Muscle cars are often more about torque and the front-engine rwd layout. In the 70s they were all slow as shit but could still peel tires and do burnouts.

Also, for those in-the-know, the mid 2000s Honda Accord v6 was about as fast as the mustang of that time, but obviously drove very different.

georgeecollins · 2h ago
6.3 is not fast these days.

I don't worry about being smoked by any Subaru (loved my WRX in the day) but dual motor Teslas? I ease off.

quickthrowman · 8h ago
I don’t have a dog in this fight, but this comparison is odd. You’re comparing the fastest Forester (XT turbocharged) to the slowest V6 Charger. The slowest V8 Charger does 0-60 in 5.1 seconds. The fastest one does 0-60 in 3.6 seconds.
GenerWork · 9h ago
Now compare your Forester to the V8 Charger with the base Hemi. Who would win?
themafia · 9h ago
A Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat does 0-60 in 3.6s.

A Suzuki GSX-1000 can do it in 2.5s.

dumbmrblah · 8h ago
Rivian R1T 2.5 seconds

https://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle-make/rivian-0-60-mph-t...

2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance - 2.8 seconds

Getting smoked by a soccer mom

themafia · 7h ago
You're right next to the point yet you've missed it. The Rivian has a wide range of performance _options_. With only the "2025 Rivian R1T Ascend Quad Max" having the performance you've quoted. How is the "ascend quad max" segment ideologically different from the "srt hellcat" segment?

Likewise the _standard_ Tesla 3 has quite a bit different 0 to 60 times than what you've quoted here.

Do you really think your soccer mom is buying the "performance" edition of the vehicle and not the "long range?" Which proves the point, performance options are not dead, and EVs only continue the trend, they don't obviate it.

standeven · 2h ago
Husband of a hockey mom here. Yes, they do get the performance model. And even the long range dual motor models are silly quick.
dumbmrblah · 6h ago
How is that any different from the charger base model versus the hellcat?
jaggs · 6h ago
Ooh this is fun. The $72K Xiaomi SU7 Ultra does 0-62mph in 1.98s. Do I win the teddy bear? :)

https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1145870_2025-xiaomi-su7-...

omgwtfbyobbq · 4h ago
Yes, yes you do.
vondur · 9h ago
Crotch Rocket vs Muscle Car?
kridsdale1 · 8h ago
Hopefully not head-on.
ProfessorLayton · 9h ago
The crazy thing is there's nothing stopping manufacturers from making electric muscle cars. Instead, we get boring aerodynamic cloned appliances sold as "SUVs".

As I've grown older though, I noticed that the less I need to drive, the happier I am. So I don't really need more than an appliance, I suppose.

rconti · 8h ago
Arguably they're ALL muscle cars, at least in the US. Nobody's making small, lightweight, low range, low power EVs.
os2warpman · 3h ago
Nissan, Chevrolet, Fiat, and Hyundai/Kia all make small, lightweight, low range, low power EVs.

With a 0-60 of 9 seconds, the Fiat 500e may be too low power. A 1993 Honda Civic is quicker than that and if you optioned a Civic coupe up to what comes standard (AC, power doors and windows, cruise) on the 500e, it was $14,700 in 1993[1], which is ~$32k today, which almost the same exact price of a 500e.

And you even get more than one airbag now!

[1]https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1993-honda-civic-2/

Aurornis · 1h ago
> Nobody's making small, lightweight, low range, low power EVs.

Small low power EVs are everywhere.

Unless you’re setting the bar so low that you expect a tiny 50-100 mile range car. That’s not going to happen because everyone would pass right over it and get an affordable EV with multiple times the range for only marginally more cost.

sokoloff · 3h ago
I’ve been driving a Nissan LEAF for the last decade. It’s exactly what you describe (and has been great as a city car for a two-car, two-driver household).
rexer · 8h ago
What would an EV muscle car look like? Tesla Model 3 seems to check a lot of boxes. Definitely not noise or muscle car power delivery, but those seems like unrealistic goals for an EV
ProfessorLayton · 8h ago
IMO what made American muscle cars special was their combination of power + unique styling + price. Yeah they were noisy (Which some really liked) and sometimes impractical, but that was okay because of they weren't trying to be everything to everyone.

A Model 3 might check a lot of boxes, but its styling is definitely not unique, and the rest of car itself is tying to appeal to as many as possible.

burnt-resistor · 6h ago
Insecure dudes seem to derive insouciant-to-proud self-satisfaction from inflicting noise, visual, and actual pollution on the rest of us which partially explains coal rollers and gaudy, loud motorcycles.
defrost · 6h ago
FWiW there's not a lot of insecurity in the B&S boys that hit the Ute Musters for the circle work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mtFYUOvYs8

A couple of thousand acres, big sheds, a couple of silos, a few trucks and combine harvesters and a go hard or go home frequently sideways attitude 'll do that, it seems.

burnt-resistor · 6h ago
To each, their own, I guess. Yeah, I get needing 4WD for snow and mountains and reasonable capabilities suitable for farm and work, but excess is excess. I also don't understand why people put up with highway princess trucks that cost $60k+. My dad's shop '78 Chevy C-10 Scottsdale lacked headrests, cupholders, and a radio only the latter of which was added. You used to be able able to buy cheap-ish fleet trims of trucks if you didn't want a bunch of plastic and extra nonsense, I don't know if that's still the case; I wonder if Toyota makes fleet versions of Tundras (made near where I live) or Tacomas (if they're not discontinuing tacos) given it doesn't sell Hi-Lux here.
defrost · 6h ago
It's not for me but I'm adjacent to rural and mining industries and understand the joy of making an OTT desktop computing rig or near industrial home-lab.

In a similar manner a mechanic that works on aircraft engines for crop dusters capable of short take off and landing with heavy loads and drafting over fields with low clearance can also enjoy tuning the heck out of a V-8 and taking it to the limit.

It's not insecurity driving that behavior, it's confidence veering into over confidence.

You can see that same let's have a go and push it mentality in building MudCrab underwater EV cars

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-30/nt-world-record-darwi...

and MudSkipper not boat not aircraft: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ILbQHnHPnY

cherrycherry98 · 8h ago
See the 2024+ Dodge Charger Daytona.
burnt-resistor · 6h ago
The vaporware Telser Roadster 2.0 with CATs. I don't think it will ever be released at this point.

https://techstory.in/teslas-roadster-2-0-still-coming-still-...

osullivj · 2h ago
The sound a crossplane V8 makes is especially delightful due to the [necessarily] asymmetric firing order. Crossplanes fire every 90 degrees, flatplanes every 180. Flatplanes produce a metallic yowl, crossplanes a fruity burble. Beats and timing are hardwired into human psychoacoustics somehow. Beats are counts without explicit numerals. The idea of mathematical aesthetic standards are appealing cf golden ratio. Crossplane firing asymmetry tickles my aesthetic fancy somehow via the Beats. So my overpowered Merc V8 is music to my ears!
matteotom · 9h ago
I can't remember where I heard this but it stuck with me: Teslas are the new American muscle car - fast in a straight line, but otherwise poor build quality and lacking the attention to drivers' experience you get from European brands.
sssilver · 9h ago
As a person who owned multiple Teslas I really don’t understand the “poor build quality” sentiment. What other car at the same price point has better build quality? And if one or two do, does that make the Teslas build quality “poor”?

I had a MINI. That was a build quality disaster. Major engine issues after only three years. I now have a Silverado 1500 LTZ. It has obvious build quality issues. Interior isn’t as good as it used to be. Gearbox has a banging sound. My Teslas seem so much better than either of those or most other cars I interact with really. I sat in my friends Toyota Camry the other day. The interior seemed so much cheaper, the sound quality so much worse, the cabin was so much more loud than my humble Model 3. What about my car has poor build quality that I am oblivious to?

unsnap_biceps · 7h ago
Build quality is less about how the interior seems cheap or not but about tolerances. A Camry can have cheap plastic everywhere, but if the connection points don't rattle, it's a "better" build quality. But the truth of it is that the majority of people don't notice the build quality. A cup holder is a cup holder, even if it slightly rattles or is slightly off center.

The main example is the panel gaps on Tesla body. They can be offset by a "large" amount compared to other car brands, but it doesn't harm anything and you have to look for it to be noticeable.

So do Tesla's have a bad build quality? Yes, if you define it by tolerances, but no if you define it by "Does it feel low quality". And the debate online is largely with people talking past each other with differing definitions of what build quality actually means.

mellow-lake-day · 5h ago
Some examples of build quality issues are the metal sheets that are glued on and coming off during driving. As well as accelerator pedals that get stuck.
GCUMstlyHarmls · 3h ago
I think the parent covered this,

> They can be offset by a "large" amount compared to other car brands

kelnos · 3h ago
> if you define it by "Does it feel low quality"

The funny thing is that whenever I get into a Tesla, the interior just feels kinda cheap and of low-quality/low-effort design. That's not saying anything about their build quality, though.

SoftTalker · 4h ago
> What other car at the same price point has better build quality?

Mercedes, BMW, Volvo, Audi, Honda, Toyota, Accura, Lexus....

qwerpy · 8h ago
It’s one of those things where you can claim Teslas have poor build quality and you get a free pass, but you will be “source?”d to death if you contradict it.

I’ve had several Teslas and even currently have their supposed disaster of a truck and have not encountered this alleged build quality issue. My car before that, a Honda Civic, spent much more time in the shop purely on account that it needed oil changes and expensive scheduled maintenances once or twice a year.

No comments yet

ronnier · 8h ago
I have two teslas and the build quality is amazing. I never do anything to them other than change the tires. Haven’t even touched the breaks. It’s the ultimate daily driver and I’ll never buy another type of car.
kridsdale1 · 8h ago
Lexus.
tw_wankette · 5h ago
I have a Lexus LX, one of the most expensive Lexus vehicles ever made. I love it. It was made in Japan.

Tesla panel gaps and quality are fine. They had some early issues, but the damn things are basically body panels hung off of almost entirely cast chunks of metal. There is not a lot of room for wiggle. If anything, they're so we'll integrated that they're hard to repair after a crash.

rainsford · 7h ago
Maybe. But crucially Teslas, and EVs in general, don't look like muscle cars and they're not marketed that way. Yeah they can be insanely fast in a straight line, but the appeal of muscle cars was about a lot more than straight line performance.

I'm not actually sure any EV could capture what people like about muscle cars, but you're definitely not going to get it from some futuristic transport blob that just happens to have a low 0-60 time. The Tesla roadster might have captured some of the sports car magic, but it's telling they don't make that any more (for now). I don't know if they could do the same thing for muscle cars at all.

dumbmrblah · 2h ago
I have a Polestar, its great. It's the closet EV that I've driven that's similar to my Corvette in terms of speed, handling etc.
threetonesun · 9h ago
Many 60s/70s American muscle cars had racing pedigrees. It was a coupe with a V8, one could argue they were replaced by the JDM market with turbo 4s/I6s in the 90s early 2000s.

Maybe more importantly, either of the above had an appealing visual style (to some!) and had their own community around them. Teslas are pretty visually boring, you can't really modify them, but I suppose they have a community of their own who debates which version of software drives the car for you better.

ux266478 · 4h ago
At the time that the muscle car came into existence, there was nothing wrong with the build quality of American cars compared to European cars. It wasn't until the mid-70s that this changed.
a_vanderbilt · 5h ago
Given the advancements of EVs, the death of the muscle car was inevitable. They are almost universally faster, more performant, more efficient, and more "cool" in their designs. Do gear heads dislike them? Sure, but they aren't going to be the market forever. As energy costs rise, natural market forces will shift the demands of the buyer.
platevoltage · 3h ago
It doesn't help that we have a bunch of people who drive crossovers with zero character, can't point to a spark plug on their engine, but are also somehow so upset about the internal combustion engine being replaced that they fighting EV adoption with everything they have. It's almost like they're told what to think.
jgalt212 · 4h ago
> As energy costs rise,

That's a big if. And even more so if everyone moves to EVs, then gas demand goes down and it ICEs become even cheaper to run. Ultimately, we need a carbon tax and no more EV credits. What did EV credits do for us? It created Elon.

platevoltage · 3h ago
There was probably a time when vacuum tubes were extremely cheap for audio enthusiasts that kept their tube amps as the world was transitioning into solid state electronics.

That did not last, and I'm talking about before trade with Russia was basically halted.

flatline-84 · 9h ago
Here in Australia, Mustang V8s hold their value pretty well. When I was looking for a sports car (which I've now learnt is very different to a muscle car), the Mustang was top of the list because there was nothing else out there with:

- manual - V8 - 2 doors - under <$100k

I spent a week with one, and while I quite enjoyed it, it required you to really rev out the engine to feel anything (which is nice!). Except that would push you into 130km/h+ which means instant loss of license for 6 months and a forever tarnished record meaning insurance is much more expensive for the rest of your life.

Settled for an ND2 MX-5 that I throw around corners now. It means I have to have a "normal" car as a daily (as the MX-5 isn't that practical) but it also means I can have fun without getting pulled up by the gestapo

tw_wankette · 5h ago
Am I reading this right? 130 km/h is ~ 80 mph. In the US, doing 80 in a 70-zone doesn't upset most police officers.
quicklime · 4h ago
I'm not the person you replied to, but in a 110 km/h (70 mph) zone you'd get away with just a fine in Australia if caught/pulled over. To lose your license for six months, you'd need to be doing 130+ km/h in an 80 km/h (50 mph) zone.
shirro · 5h ago
Australia's road laws tend to be strictly applied. Large fines and demerit points that can lead to loss of licence. We also have random breath tests.

We have much lower road fatalities than the USA per 100,000 people and per billion km traveled though the rates in remote areas are considerably higher.

Falkon1313 · 3h ago
Yeah, we also have many highways with a speed limit of 80 and one with speed limit up to 85mph (~137kmh), so you wouldn't necessarily even be speeding.
jillesvangurp · 2h ago
I got upgraded once to a yellow mustang in San Francisco. I admit, I wasn't unhappy about that. I reserved the economy car, I ended up driving around the valley in a yellow mustang. With a big smile on my face.

But it wasn't necessarily a great car. It had a lot of condensation on the inside of the car in the morning. I've never seen that in any other car. My suitcase barely fit in the back. Etc. A lot of form over function in that car.

I don't own a car. In fact, I've never owned one. I just rent cars when I need them, which isn't all that often these days. I live in Berlin which is a big city that wile car friendly (by European standards) is a bit of a PITA to get around in by car. And there's public transport. And it takes about fifty minutes to even leave the city in a car because you are stuck in stop start traffic. But if I ever move out, I might need a car.

If I ever buy a car, it will be electric. ICE cars are relics of the past. That mustang makes pleasing vroom vroom noises (and they are very pleasing) but that's about it. That's what they are optimized for. Even a modest EV has more torque (the whole point of a muscle car), better handling, etc. And they are just a lot more practical. EV performance breaks the illusion that a muscle car is, well, a muscle car.

As for EVs being boring. Many of them are. Especially those in the US because it's currently cut off from the rest of the world and not exactly state of the art at this point. If you want exciting EVs to lust after, go to China. They have them in every shape and size. The new xpeng looks great, there's the huawei car, the BYD u7 and u9. And some of those are quite affordable (in China). They are unobtainium elsewhere of course, which adds to their desirability.

I don't speak from experience of course, but I do watch a lot of EV reviews. There's this myth that EVs can't be fun. They can be. It's not about the noise but it is about the highly tunable driving experience, ridiculous torque, etc. What works for muscle cars (big engine, light weight car) also works for EVs. Some of the more affordable fun options are smaller, lighter cars. Even retro conversions of classic sports cars can be a lot of fun apparently. And some of those end up being lighter after their conversion and handle better than the original.

And I bet there are a few classic muscle car conversions. Are they still fun if you take away the vroom vroom noise but otherwise increase all the performance metrics? I don't know. It probably still is quite a lot of fun to drive one.

flomo · 1h ago
Just fyi, the Mustang was originally marketed as more of a young woman's car, and only certain models are considered to be "musclemen" cars. Rental agencies stock these because they are fun for tourists, so glad you enjoyed it. (SF Bay has a greenbelt, so recommend to all driving the 1 or 35 Skyline to Santa Cruz.)
thunderbong · 3h ago
cogman10 · 9h ago
> Brooke Rennert, a 21-year-old from Rochester Hills putting herself through welding school by working as the only woman at her oil-change job, isn’t having any of it. “I don’t like electric cars. I like the sound of a heavy engine. I like the power,” she said. “An electric vehicle has power, but in a different way. It’s not like a big V8, big-block sound.”

This, IMO, is exactly why they are dying. They are more expensive than regular cars and the only reason anyone likes them is because they are loud and obnoxious.

There's just fewer and fewer people that need a loud noise maker to be happy, certainly not when that noise maker will cost you $60k you likely don't have since inflation has gone crazy while salaries have stagnated.

The people that do end up gravitating to the noise makers will choose a loud motorcycle instead.

dotancohen · 9h ago
I spent years driving, modifying, and racing V-8 Fords from the mid sixties to the early seventies. I've replaced the 2.3 TurboCoupe with a 351W I built myself. I'm very familiar with muscle cars, both carbureted and FE, with points and with electronic injection, smog-legal and without carbs.

My electric family sedan (Tesla model 3 long range) has everything I've ever liked about muscle cars - in abundance. 498 horsepower, a "first gear" that will wind up past 200 kph, instant throttle response. The only thing missing are the impracticalities - the noise, the small back seat, the smell of tires and soot and oil leaking from somewhere. Oh, and the oil changes, and the plug changes, and the stolen catalytic converters, and the coils that go bad, and the fan clutch, and the PCV system, and the fuel/oil/air filter maintenance, and the drive belt, and the injectors, and the exhaust manifold gaskets, and the muffler, and the yearly smog checks.

rconti · 8h ago
There are lots of reasons to like combustion vehicles outside of noise. The varying way they deliver power across the rev range is different in every vehicle, for one. One of my cars is a small displacement turbo motor and I love pinning it low in the rev range and feeling the power surge as the boost ramps up, and this is different under all kinds of conditions; different engine speeds, air temperatures, altitude...

A nice, tactile gear change is particularly pleasurable as well. And sounds do go along with all this, but they don't necessarily need to be loud.

I can imagine a bizarro version of this comment where a future person in a world where all of your caloric needs are met by a pill you take daily, ranting about how food enthusiasts insist on shoving their smelly food up your nostrils as you walk by an unnecessary-in-this-day-and-age restaurant, and how they only do it to annoy other people.

herpdyderp · 9h ago
Most of the people I know (including myself) that are into these kinds of cars buy used instead. Or they bought their car 50 years ago and still maintain it.
cosmic_cheese · 9h ago
The noise aspect is actually one of the things that’s keeping me away from cheap used ICE and hybrid cars right now. Some amount of premium for full electric is worth not having to listen to an engine, particularly on models that aren’t expensive enough to come with good sound isolation.

The sound profile of a V8 is very different from the 4-cylinder and similar I’m shopping for of course, but the principle still applies. I also just don’t want to be my neighbor who finds it necessary to come and go at odd hours in the most abrasive manner possible.

MisterTea · 9h ago
I don't see loud cars dying off with muscle cars because I see more obnoxious BMW's along with a few Honda and Infinity with pop and gurgle tunes and open exhaust than Chargers, Mustangs, etc.

> There's just fewer and fewer people that need a loud noise maker to be happy,

Come to south Queens NYC and you'll find plenty of these people. There's a shop around the block from me that builds these noise makers and I get to hear them test drive them up and down the block.

winrid · 9h ago
They don't need to be that expensive. Allow people to opt into lower safety standards (you are comparing with a motorcycle after all) and add a carbon tax with a threshold so I can pay for less complicated emissions equipment.

Also, the loud sound != big. V8 != Loud, esp when many v6 motors are close in displacement to Ford's 5 liter V8.

hatthew · 8h ago
Muscle cars are cool in the same way that smoking is cool. Impractical, dangerous, and expensive, but has strong associations with "cool" people: noir detectives, rebellious teenagers, action movie heroes, etc.
thmsths · 9h ago
Isn't Harley Davidson dying too though?
cogman10 · 9h ago
There are much cheaper and louder competitors to Harleys. It doesn't help that harleys are pretty strongly associated with Gen X and Boomers now. You don't usually see millennials or Gen z riding a harley.
SoftTalker · 4h ago
They'll probably become popular with the Alphas or Betas again.
a2dam · 9h ago
Salaries have outpaced inflation until recently.
selectodude · 9h ago
Don’t even bother coming here with facts. Inflation is just a vibe, dude. Never mind that real median personal incomes are up 10 percent in the last decade.
bill_joy_fanboy · 9h ago
> Salaries have outpaced inflation until recently.

This is just not true.

sokoloff · 3h ago
Take a look at a chart of real median income. Which while it is admittedly somewhat different from salary, is a hell of lot more than “nuh-uh”

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N

burnt-resistor · 6h ago
You can't buy cool new off a parking lot, but marketing has convinced masses as such.

I'd rather have an EV conversion vintage VW Westy, Defender 110, Citroën DS, or Ferrari 250 GT California, or a fuggly Thing, Edsel, or Lada.

jedberg · 2h ago
> Ferrari 250 GT California

doing an EV conversion on a body kit is my dream car.

Although I like your style of doing a Thing or an Edsel!

You'd miss out on the unique gear pattern on the Thing haha.

platevoltage · 3h ago
I want to do an EV conversion to my 86 Mercedes once that becomes something affordable to pull off.
burnt-resistor · 2h ago
It's affordable now using reclaimed Tesla parts.

Here's one vendor: https://www.evwest.com/

I really want to ditch the 1.9L H4 Digijet in my '85 Westfalia. It's a total PITA (direct fuel injection and a distributor) but I'm not keen on dropping in a GoWesty or "Subagon" ICE motor when EV is the way to go.

dartharva · 3h ago
supportengineer · 9h ago
I think a Mustang would be a great car to own, especially with a V-8 and manual transmission, but social media has ruined it for me. There are non stop videos of Mustangs crashing when leaving meets such as Cars With Coffee. Now, the Mustang brand is synonymous with this type of driving. If you bought one you would immediately be looked down upon.
GenerWork · 9h ago
Who cares what the social media jabronis drive? If you want a manual V8 Mustang and can afford it, get it and have some fun.
MSFT_Edging · 9h ago
It genuinely is just people joking. I've never met a mustang owner that got upset by the crowd jokes, and they often tell them themselves.

Mustangs got the reputation because they were cheap power with a solid rear end which made peeling out into a turn incredibly unstable.

genewitch · 3h ago
"Mustangs are all exhaust until they hit the wall" - my ex

i owned one. it was quite loud. Not as loud as the 240SX i took the muffler off to have a shop look at it up the road, but still, pretty loud.

I still drive a 4.6L V8, though. Just not american.

platevoltage · 3h ago
Or you could grab a Dodge Viper before they're all crashed by their owners.
drillbyt · 2h ago
I put a supercharger on mine :D
herpdyderp · 9h ago
I've seen plenty of similar videos of Corvettes, Porsches, Challengers, etc. and it has no impact on my view of the brand or model.
platevoltage · 3h ago
I assume anyone driving a Challenger or Charger is someone I need to stay away from.
Esophagus4 · 5h ago
You’re a better man than I, because the clientele has definitely ruined some brands for me.

Every time I see a car zipping in and out of lanes at 90 mph with no turn signal, it’s a BMW.

And similarly for the boomers with goatees and USA tees with Corvettes.

And similarly for Camaros with aftermarket exhausts that seem to exist for no reason other than irritating your neighbors.

I don’t want to be associated with that.

I know it’s shallow, but then again, so am I…

eschneider · 9h ago
People don't look down on Mustangs, they look down on people with more horsepower than brains.