This article links to a Forbes article that states it was a leak of a Saleforce instance that contained contact information about small and medium businesses.
This PCWorld article seems to be taking that to mean that every single gmail account (2.5B) is at risk with nothing to support that claim.
nh2 · 10h ago
Duplicate of event from August 5 ("one of Google’s corporate Salesforce instances was impacted"):
Salesforce did not have user data, so the title is bogus
decimalenough · 10h ago
Can we fix the title? This was a hack of a Salesforce instance used by Google, not Google itself.
phendrenad2 · 10h ago
I get the sense that there was a time when Google would have not have trusted an off-the-shelf solution like Salesforce, and would have built their own in-house thing.
roscas · 10h ago
So many hacks before that had name, address, phone, ss number, had it all and people don't blink an eye.
Until it happens to them.
lokar · 10h ago
I remember hearing that Google forced its insurance provider to make up new IDs for employees rather then use SSN, which was common at the time.
nullc · 10h ago
> Activate Google’s Advanced Protection Program
I'm dubious. This requires you give google a phone number. Almost universally if you give a company a phone number there is eventually an avenue for an attacker to convince the company to give them control of the account by demonstrating control of the number (which they've sim swapped or otherwise hijacked).
Even if at the moment there is no avenue to exploit google this way (also doubtful), all it takes is some new product (like workspaces) that has a different security understanding or new bugs to open a vector.
thrill · 10h ago
A phone number is optional if you give a recovery email. Create an iCloud account you don't use for any other reason and don't share it with anyone.
nullc · 4h ago
Nope. Doesn't work. Insists on adding a recovery phone number.
exabrial · 10h ago
Don't worry I still get advertisements I can't unsubscribe from with one click from silicon valley bros.
javier2 · 10h ago
Now they can train ad bots on your emails too!
wslh · 10h ago
Isn't this huge from Google's security perspective? I don't recall any previous successful attack on its core infrastructure.
The hack was on a Salesforce instance owned and operated by Salesforce but used by Google, not Google core infra.
lern_too_spel · 10h ago
The headline looks incorrect. This looks like a blogspam of a blogspam of the original Salesforce database hack reported a while ago, where Google Cloud customers had their company name and contact information stolen. This information is useful for phishing attacks on those Google Cloud customers. Free Gmail users wouldn't be in that database.
This PCWorld article seems to be taking that to mean that every single gmail account (2.5B) is at risk with nothing to support that claim.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44812343
https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/voi...
Until it happens to them.
I'm dubious. This requires you give google a phone number. Almost universally if you give a company a phone number there is eventually an avenue for an attacker to convince the company to give them control of the account by demonstrating control of the number (which they've sim swapped or otherwise hijacked).
Even if at the moment there is no avenue to exploit google this way (also doubtful), all it takes is some new product (like workspaces) that has a different security understanding or new bugs to open a vector.
A quick search/prompt shows:
- Operation Aurora: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Aurora>
- 2010s global surveillance disclosures: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disc...>