Human brain/mind has evolved during million of years, adapting to real physical environments, resolving big problems, quite all not related to language at all, having complex language and abstract thinking emerge along the whole process.
Try to capture the end results of human evolution/thinking in some kind of machine, and imagine this will grasp/reproduce the deep nature of the human creative process seems quite superficial plan (if not totally wrong), LLM come not from an evolution process, there is no true deep evolutive structure.
For (some) humans the path to a goal is sometimes way more important than reaching the goal itself, and having a response to a problem ready from a LLM probably, convenience apart, is losing a key part of being human, eg resolving problems, creating tools, adapting to challenges.
sunscream89 · 19h ago
Thank you for someone sensible saying something. The cult of learnings gets a lot wrong.
Human brain/mind has evolved during million of years, adapting to real physical environments, resolving big problems, quite all not related to language at all, having complex language and abstract thinking emerge along the whole process. Try to capture the end results of human evolution/thinking in some kind of machine, and imagine this will grasp/reproduce the deep nature of the human creative process seems quite superficial plan (if not totally wrong), LLM come not from an evolution process, there is no true deep evolutive structure.
For (some) humans the path to a goal is sometimes way more important than reaching the goal itself, and having a response to a problem ready from a LLM probably, convenience apart, is losing a key part of being human, eg resolving problems, creating tools, adapting to challenges.