Last I was more up to date on crypto a few years ago it seemed everyone was recommending at least 2048 if you're using RSA.
It's a step, but far from the end of internet banking.
yawpitch · 8h ago
Don’t dissuade readers from getting to the “22 bits still matter” section, though. This team seems to have made substantial progress on scaling towards larger keys.
duttish · 4h ago
Fair point
cheaprentalyeti · 10h ago
I couldn't find the date in the article so I don't know if this is just a repeat of an earlier "defeat" of RSA.
romperstomper · 8h ago
This is just a repeat. At the end they have the link to the original article from 2024.
alphan0n · 9h ago
06/24/2025 - Bottom left corner of the image at the top.
cheaprentalyeti · 6h ago
Well, I'll have to double check the stuff I already sent, I need to decide whether to send this off to a couple cryptologically inclined friends of mine or not.
cheaprentalyeti · 6h ago
So thanks to both you and Romperstomper for answering both yes and no.
Last I was more up to date on crypto a few years ago it seemed everyone was recommending at least 2048 if you're using RSA.
It's a step, but far from the end of internet banking.