Ask HN: Would you take a job where back end is only in PHP?

FAANG companies care more about your problem-solving abilities and system design skills than the specific language you've used, so learning PHP while gaining microservices experience is actually valuable as it demonstrates adaptability.

Writing or maintaining? I am sure besides all the hate it's surely possible to build cool clean things with PHP.

However, working on legacy PHP code (as I have experienced in the past) ranks within the worst things I could imagine for a job.

IMO you're overthinking it. If the company/people seem nice, the money is good and the challenge is something that'll keep you interested - go for it.

You can justify/spin pretty much anything on a resume.

PHP is old tech, but works fine.

The language api is somewhat inconsistent due to legacy weaknesses and compatibility.

That said, I prefer old-style PHP (like it was written in version 5ish) instead of the new object orienteted/composer/micro-library stuff (that I consider the javascript virus).

Having moved away from PHP a decade ago, I recently had to update some old code (that I had written originally). And even with almost a decade of not using php, the experience was pleasurable enough.

As a senior the TLDR is: The PHP language itself is fine, the actual code base itself means more (and can either be fine or not), but in the end it is the work environment (do you like your coworkers, bosses and are the time constraints reasonable) that mean the most.

Regarding your CV, I would always prefer a candidate with production experiences in (at least) two different environments to a "one trick pony", so I have a hard time seeing that it could hurt you.

Totally so!

Using PHP in production means:

- The employer organisation is incompetent, or they won't be doing it

- They are also rich, or they'd be bankrupt trying to do it.

Both are good signs if you are looking for a job there.