Hey HN. Since this has showed up here maybe a status update would be interesting? This continues to be my main side project--amusingly it's had more traction than any of the startups I tried to build with it. Over the past year I've been working on some experimental features for Biff that are meant to help with medium-to-large codebases[1] (I've been doing this as I rewrite one of my Biff apps from scratch). There haven't been many code releases in that time, so I've got a decently sized backlog of things I'd really like to get to. E.g. XTDB v2 is almost out of beta; once I finish the app rewrite, that's next on my list.
Thank you for doing this. I am just checking out the Biff framework.
One part I would change is the dependence on htmx for html generation. I would really prefer an external template file into which we can replace fields
playworker · 10h ago
I might have misunderstood your comment but I don't think that's what htmx does, it just adds reactivity without needing to write JS, the HTML is represented in the project using Hiccup syntax which is essentially HTML in Clojure data structures - makes sense when code is data is a big part of the Lisp idea. It is an external template file into which you can replace fields, it's just a Clojure file too.
pkphilip · 8h ago
My mistake. I mean Hiccup (not Htmx). I prefer the approach of using external template files.
adityaathalye · 5h ago
AFAIK, all libraries are loosely coupled in Biff. Swapping out Hiccup / Rum for one of the other HTML templating options should be in "userspace"; straightforwardly so, without the framework maintainers intervention.
Rarely. Given the stability of the language and its library ecosystem.
jb1991 · 10h ago
“Batteries included” is an expression referring to technical dependencies and other matters and is not to be taken literally.
stonemetal12 · 3h ago
I took it as a poke at how short lived batteries-included web frameworks seem to be in clojure.
Daviey · 8h ago
Do you have an example of a Clojure web framework that doesn't include batteries?
ie, does https://luminusweb.com/ (or it's successor Kit, https://kit-clj.github.io/) includes batteries? They provide integrated solutions with templating, database access, authentication, and other common web application components pre-configured.
It's one of those weasel phrases that is poorly defined and has unclear boundaries.
I think Python first used it for the entire ecosystem:
'The Python source distribution has long maintained the philosophy of "batteries included" -- having a rich and versatile standard library which is immediately available, without making the user download separate packages. This gives the Python language a head start in many projects.'
So anything which doesn't require downloading separate packages, and provides a rich and versatile standard library is "batteries included"? Hugo in Golang, or Jekyll in Python are certainly batteries included then. Should all of them add this to their strapline?
The distinction becomes less clear when frameworks offer plugin ecosystems or when they're built atop other "batteries included" platforms. This creates a spectrum rather than a binary classification, leaving me quite skeptical of this adoption of marketing language.
[1] https://biffweb.com/p/structuring-large-codebases/
One part I would change is the dependence on htmx for html generation. I would really prefer an external template file into which we can replace fields
Ref:
Biff's own documentation: https://biffweb.com/docs/reference/architecture/#modifying-t...
HTML templating options: https://ericnormand.me/mini-guide/clojure-html-templates
ie, does https://luminusweb.com/ (or it's successor Kit, https://kit-clj.github.io/) includes batteries? They provide integrated solutions with templating, database access, authentication, and other common web application components pre-configured.
It's one of those weasel phrases that is poorly defined and has unclear boundaries.
I think Python first used it for the entire ecosystem:
- https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0206/So anything which doesn't require downloading separate packages, and provides a rich and versatile standard library is "batteries included"? Hugo in Golang, or Jekyll in Python are certainly batteries included then. Should all of them add this to their strapline?
The distinction becomes less clear when frameworks offer plugin ecosystems or when they're built atop other "batteries included" platforms. This creates a spectrum rather than a binary classification, leaving me quite skeptical of this adoption of marketing language.
Zodiac itself does very little. Its mostly a preconfigured Ring app and a Reitit based router.
Full disclosure, I'm the author.
https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/biff/biff.1.en.html
It looks interesting. I really like clojure when I tried it long ago but never had a good use for it.