To play the devil's advocate: citing Laura Loomer's mug as an example is a slander to Mar-a-Lago–faced folks everywhere. Her "signature look" is best considered as an anti-model for future surgeons and operees.
bn-l · 2h ago
Is this dailymail style editorial appropriate for Wikipedia?
cobbzilla · 3h ago
I frankly didn’t know much about Kristi Noam until the most recent South Park piqued my curiosity. I found this fascinating gem of an article diving into a wikipedia rabbit hole.
moralestapia · 4h ago
Despicable, really.
So now it's suddenly ok to ridicule the appearance of women Weren't they supposed to be their allies? What a bunch of sc*mbags.
Never giving a cent to Wikipedia ever, as it is clear it is now a political platform, away from its intended purpose, and for one very specific country.
pavel_lishin · 4h ago
How much have you given in the past?
moralestapia · 3h ago
That doesn't make any difference.
Weird.
pavel_lishin · 43m ago
It does. If you've never donated to Wikipedia, then saying you'll never donate means nothing, as you weren't likely to start anyway. It would have all the weight of a vegan telling us they're going to start boycotting a local steakhouse.
bediger4000 · 1h ago
Very strange! This article had the opposite effect on me. I just donated.
So now it's suddenly ok to ridicule the appearance of women Weren't they supposed to be their allies? What a bunch of sc*mbags.
Never giving a cent to Wikipedia ever, as it is clear it is now a political platform, away from its intended purpose, and for one very specific country.
Weird.