U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel (cnbc.com)
604 points by givemeethekeys 6d ago 718 comments
Claude Sonnet will ship in Xcode (developer.apple.com)
465 points by zora_goron 18h ago 367 comments
Fake accounts drove the DeepSeek AI hype and distorted markets
29 evai 14 8/29/2025, 2:36:40 PM evai.ai ↗
This wasn’t just random spam — the accounts showed patterns typical of coordinated bot networks (synchronous posting, recycled avatars, and disproportionate engagement).
The result: investors and the market briefly reacted to a level of “traction” that wasn’t real.
I’m curious how others here think about this:
How can we distinguish genuine user adoption from manufactured buzz in an LLM/AI market that is moving this fast?
What tools or heuristics do you use to check the authenticity of online signals?
(Research details and case breakdown in the post.)
This doesn't sound accurate. There are no "small versions" of deepseek r1. They released some distilled fine-tunes of their big model. They took qwen2.5 models as a starting point, and fine-tuned them with ~800k generations made with deepseek r1. But they did not change any of the model's architecture, so the "base" model released by qwen and the fine-tuned one released by deepseek should run identically on your hardware.
I do see generic statements like "boosting each other", and I see vaguely-drawn lines in the primary diagram with no further explanation, but that hardly counts as network analysis, right?
nobody is immune to propaganda, but this one slid off me like water off of ducks back
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/china-ai-deepseek-chatbot-6ac4ad...
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/china-deepseek-ai-nvidia-openai-...
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/deepseek-ai-how-it-works-725cb46...
The Western "AI" influencers and shills are much more sophisticated than that.