Medical cannabis patient data exposed by unsecured database

42 hacker_yacker 17 8/19/2025, 6:30:57 PM wired.com ↗

Comments (17)

shifty1 · 2h ago
0cf8612b2e1e · 1h ago

  Cybersecurity Researcher, Jeremiah Fowler, discovered and reported to Website Planet about an unencrypted and non-password-protected database that contained 957,434 records. The database belongs to an Ohio-based organization that helps individuals obtain physician‑certified medical marijuana cards. The database held PII, drivers licenses, medical records, documents containing SSNs, and other internal potentially sensitive information.
So, the absolute bare minimum was not followed. Just wide open database containing medical information.
firefax · 1h ago
More evidence cannabis needs to be recreational. We can let people use their FSA money for it and/or give a steep discount to people who "really" need it, like cancer patients... but I think a lot of people who bounce between

Anyways, there are a LOT of little fly by night outfits that "help" you get a medical card in many states. It's a joke, and all it does is empower the same type of person who used to be a pill doctor to rent seek, and it's not at all a surprise one had poor data practices.

hacker_yacker · 3h ago
Nearly a million records, which appear to be linked to a medical-cannabis-card company in Ohio, included Social Security numbers, government IDs, health conditions, and more.
sailfast · 2h ago
So are people storing these things in a non-HIPAA-compliant way or is this mostly attributable to some other vector that would not have been helped by compliance?

What a terrible leak - med records and marijuana use, especially in some circles - could be very useful blackmail material. :/

nickff · 1h ago
From some quick research, it seems unclear whether dispensaries are covered entities under HIPAA, as they are not reimbursed by Insurers, due to the federal illegality of the drug. https://mjbizdaily.com/do-medical-marijuana-companies-need-t...
sailfast · 54m ago
Kinda incredible - even if they’re not covered providers they are still requesting medical records!
nickff · 19m ago
They usually require records for compliance with state regulations (but the state does not require them to follow HIPAA).
adi4213 · 1h ago
I think there are even more basic table stakes that were missed here well prior to conducting any manner of formal compliance auditing - like unauthenticated users accessing this database!
hardwaresofton · 31m ago
Why is the database not named?
sailfast · 51m ago
One more thing to note here: anybody in this database that is also part of the OPM leaks or holds a federal job (or is a trucker or other non-drug requirement) will now be compromised and subject to blackmail.

If the dots are connected they will lose their jobs. Full stop.

neilv · 21m ago
> As legal cannabis has expanded around the United States for both recreational and medical use, companies have amassed troves of data about customers and their transactions.

And that should be treated as a massive liability, where one breach wipes out your company with lawsuits. And the wronged parties can go after the assets of executives and maybe even investors, due to willful criminal negligence.

If there's any justice, the "greed is good" techbro industry will finally be told that the sociopathic combination of systemic surveillance/stalking and gross indifference about even basic security is over.

riffic · 2h ago
my neighborhood weed guy would never betray my trust in this way.
dolebirchwood · 5m ago
Mine once asked if I'd like a referral to a doctor who was quite liberal in approving people for medical cards in my jurisdiction. I said, "And end up being tracked as a known user in a government database? No thanks." Safer on the streets.
cpursley · 2h ago
Mongo?
yieldcrv · 1h ago
free bank accounts for money laundering

(new account online, new coinbase account online, stuff new account with cash, transfer to coinbase, transfer onchain, swap to monero, wait, access all with new mac address, new wifi, new browser session, or Tor if the services allow)

daily reminder that KYC is a joke, the institutions and enforcement agencies that think it works, don’t know when its not working as long as a real id and ssn and address is used

aspenmayer · 42m ago
Now show cashing out.

This isn't meant to be a gotcha or a takedown, as I appreciate that you're one of the few HN users knowledgeable about crypto who isn't a shill or dismissive of crypto out of hand.

For those who aren't familiar with this industry, there are folks whose job it is to solve these problems with KYC being less effective than it ought to be. Many work in industry as devs, and many do the same as part of the Department of Justice or an affiliated agency or approved third party contractor. There are relevant working groups that bring all relevant parties together for operations. I don't want to assume that you don't know this, but you should not make it out like crime is easy, or that it pays. That said, government salaries are criminally low across the board. I can only assume the private sector of this niche pays better, as it can't very well pay much less than the public sector. Why this is the case is absurd, as it is mostly to do with pay scales and levels, and the near-impossibility of paying workers more, even when it's ready money that is already allocated.