This immediatelly reminded me of a discussion I had here on HN 11 months ago:
> Now seriously, by Llama being "sort of" open source, it does not seem to be something someone can fork and develop/evolve it without Meta, right? If one day Meta comes and says "we are closing Llama and evolving it in a proprietary mode from now on" would this Llama indie scene continue to exist?https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41391471
I still have that doubt, it seems that we are going to see it answered.
mensetmanusman · 4h ago
A future where hackers share billion dollar csv files over airdrop.
al2o3cr · 3h ago
Shorter Zuck: "We totally have superintelligence, it just goes to a different school. In Canada."
> Now seriously, by Llama being "sort of" open source, it does not seem to be something someone can fork and develop/evolve it without Meta, right? If one day Meta comes and says "we are closing Llama and evolving it in a proprietary mode from now on" would this Llama indie scene continue to exist? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41391471
I still have that doubt, it seems that we are going to see it answered.