Fine dining restaurants researching guests to make their dinner unforgettable

38 borski 81 7/13/2025, 3:30:29 PM sfgate.com ↗

Comments (81)

prasadjoglekar · 7h ago
The title seems ominous but the article itself is about how a fancy restaurant will go out of it's way to make you feel special. They're perusing your social media for clues.

In the past your spouse or kid would call and let the maitre'd know it was special; now I guess it's a job for someone on staff.

steveBK123 · 6h ago
Until some YC backed SaaS LLM AI automates the process and it becomes table stakes. Then they find other uses for it..
CoastalCoder · 46m ago
> and it becomes table stakes.

I see what you did there.

hungmung · 6h ago
I'm waiting for fully automated writing style recognition that finds all your throwaway accounts and sends you a shakedown letter.
markus_zhang · 14m ago
I suspect HN is already checking IP.
satvikpendem · 6h ago
Reproducing Hacker News writing style fingerprinting, by antirez of Redis fame

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43705632

steveBK123 · 6h ago
It’s really great that the most successful people in Silicon Valley disregard the social implications of their work. Arguably that’s what makes them so successful.
satvikpendem · 6h ago
This was possible before, as the post shows with a previous HN post, nothing to do with Silicon Valley.
theideaofcoffee · 19m ago
'Silicon Valley' here is just proxy for 'self-delusional tech glitterati with a cheap veneer of enlightenment'.
brookst · 6h ago
Are we really doing the slippery slope dangers of a high end restaurant going out of their way to delight?
atmavatar · 4h ago
If they're already vetting your social media, they can also start refusing service based upon religious or political leanings displayed in your posts. No slope (slippery or otherwise) is required.

Imagine making reservations for a family dinner but being turned away at the door because the restaurant found a post (in support/critical) of Trump or one of his policies. The restaurant would be completely within its rights to do so, even if it seems a stupid and pointless business decision to cut clientele in half.

tptacek · 1h ago
So, yes, is your answer to the preceding question.
closewith · 6h ago
Unlawful in the EU, thankfully. The US seriously needs to revaluate it's data protection laws.
dang · 2h ago
Thanks! We've changed the title above to use a more representative phrase from the article.
mousethatroared · 1h ago
Still creepy.
jjmarr · 6h ago
Reminds me of The Menu.
satvikpendem · 6h ago
Reminds me of The Bear which has scenes like this. It is quite common in higher end restaurant, like those at the Michelin level to customize the experience for each guest (at least to a small degree, not necessarily changing out the entire menu for them).
pbh101 · 6h ago
Which itself draws from the book ‘Unreasonable Hospitality’ and iirc the Chicago restaurant ‘Ever’ featured in the show applies this approach.
tptacek · 1h ago
(The "Ever" in "The Bear" is a composite of many restaurants).
brookst · 6h ago
And the Four Seasons has been recognized for this for many years; it was a case study in business school for me.
mingus88 · 6h ago
The Bear is literally the lead-in paragraph for the article
satvikpendem · 6h ago
Yes, that is why I mentioned it.
yieldcrv · 6h ago
Going to The French Laundry has many similar to The Menu and felt like it was what the movie was satirizing
satvikpendem · 5h ago
The Menu is specifically satirizing the show Chef's Table [0]. Notice the same sort of music and compositon of the plates as well as the font.

[0] https://youtu.be/BkN9dDGTgtw

yieldcrv · 5h ago
Thanks, I was curious
fnord77 · 6h ago
author doesn't understand the definition of "vetting"

which is par for the course for sfgate/chronicle

Hnrobert42 · 1h ago
Privacy concerns aside, I would be mortified if a restaurant did something special for me. I don't want extra attention. I don't want to have to pretend to be excited about a beverage I don't really care for or a gift I will just throw away.

Now if you will excuse, I see some clouds at which I need to shake my cane.

CoastalCoder · 43m ago
What if their special thing for you was to treat you like a truly genetic customer?

I.e., like what Leslie Knope did for Run Swanson on his birthday.

rglover · 6h ago
So this is basically a modern approach to Danny Meyer's (Union Square Hospitality Group [1]) "collecting the dots" he described in his book Setting the Table [2].

His suggestion was to have staff listen to conversations (and have conversations with guests) and then record any interesting "dots" like a child having a graduation coming up or an anniversary just around the corner. That way on their next visit the staff could be well-prepared.

Click-bait headline makes you think otherwise, but this is just standard hospitality stuff.

[1] https://www.ushg.com/

[2] https://www.amazon.com/Setting-Table-Transforming-Hospitalit...

userbinator · 38m ago
It must be emphasised that they're doing this with public information and presumably whatever else you've implicitly consented to giving them, so I don't see a problem with that. Nonetheless this isn't the experience I'd want from a restaurant, and fortunately there are plenty of others to choose from.
satvikpendem · 5h ago
It's funny to read these comments, of course HN would react this way but since the vast majority of restaurant patrons are so-called normies, it doesn't make much sense to cater to HNers. In fact, most normal people actually prefer that restaurants know their interests and cater to them, it leads to their higher satisfaction and makes the restaurant experience (which includes more than just the taste of the food, for most people at least) more memorable overall.
sublinear · 5h ago
I don't see what's so normal about any of this. In the past your friends would just mention a few hints while making the reservation... and people still do this now.

If they need to scan your social media, that speaks volumes about how you socialize and the quality of those interactions. Plenty of "normal" people don't want this either. The thoughts mean more coming from your friends than a creepy restaurant.

JumpCrisscross · 1h ago
I’m genuinely confused by people who find it creepy that their public social media be scanned and analysed. You made it public!
sublinear · 1h ago
The creepy part isn't what, but why. The article later mentions a place that is "old school" and actually talks to their patrons.

If the goal is to attract and keep patrons, especially at a high end restaurant where details matter, I think some formalities are still reasonably expected.

satvikpendem · 1h ago
You're proving my point. Only do people on HN care, I've never heard of anyone "normal" expressing concern over this sort of restaurant policy, and doubly so if they made their entire account public in the first place. By all means, friends can mention a few hints, but that doesn't mean that restaurants won't do their own research.

> If they need to scan your social media, that speaks volumes about how you socialize and the quality of those interactions.

No, it doesn't, and I don't see how you came to the conclusion that if a restaurant had to scan my social media that it says anything about how I socialize. People don't just socialize only on social media, you know.

sublinear · 1h ago
All I'm saying is if I'm important to the business they should take the time to know me in person, not try to leverage technology to make this more efficient. The customer is not cattle.

If my friends care, they will know what to surprise me with better than someone who glanced online as a rote part of their job.

satvikpendem · 59m ago
What gave you the impression that they don't also talk to their customers as well?
cyberge99 · 5h ago
I wonder if there’s ever been a case of mistaken identity. A bear lover instead of a penguin lover for example.
astrange · 1h ago
Good opportunity to learn about SingleThread, which is a 90s-style throwback to when it was impossible to learn anything about Japan so people just made things up. Like, they call their customers "chairman of the board" because they just heard a random word somewhere?

Japanese customer service ("omotenashi") is mostly about not listening to your customers. You get exactly what they want to give you and that's it. If you have a dietary restriction they may just kick you out because they won't/can't change the menu.

dceddia · 6h ago
These comments are such a great pointer to the way outrage is engineered.
fsflover · 6h ago
Can you elaborate?
dceddia · 6h ago
The title implies (well, I'd say explicitly states with the word "vetting") that restaurants are trying to filter guests, maybe to avoid troublesome ones with uncouth posts online or something. And many of the comments are replying to that interpretation, based on the unfairness suggested in the title. It's not only clickbait, it's outrage bait, designed to spark anger.

The article itself is about how restaurants have gone above and beyond for some guests where they've been able to tell from their social media that they're celebrating a special occasion or some other thing like that. To make the guests' experience better and memorable.

There's a privacy angle to this, should restaurants do that, slippery slope, etc etc... but many of the comments aren't talking about that. They're responding to the inflammatory title.

I don't think we often get such a clear picture into the why behind online outrage and how clearly manufactured it can often be. I think it's easy to believe people are angry for a good reason, to take the anger "on good faith" in some sense. In this case, with the title being so far from the article, it's clear to see what's going on. And makes one wonder about the rest of the outrage out there.

borski · 6h ago
I couldn’t agree more. Half the reason I posted it was the aggressive title; I was curious to see what would happen, and it was precisely what I expected heh.

The other half of the reason was that I really did think it was an interesting article. But having to keep the title the same was a fascinating social experiment.

dceddia · 6h ago
Thanks for running the experiment :)
vicurve · 6h ago
You know how you sometimes read a title or a topic and you can infer the kind of commentary a particular topic will have? Even going so far as to expect words like “enshittification” to be used for both stating a point as well as for in-group signaling? Sort of like how opinions are front-loaded even if the article was read? (And very often the opinions are things we’ve heard before from many other people, this is a given).

Well, we’ve entered a period in manufactured outrage on the internet where an audience is primed ahead of time with talking points and perspectives that are deemed allowed, and then these reflexes are triggered over and over by the same kind of articles. And it’s the frenzy that counts.

It used to be confined to FB and other places but the average commenter has changed and so the average commentary has changed.

Articles are increasingly becoming rage bait, moreso than clickbait. I do not know what the appeal is yet but I imagine it’s some mixture of impulsivity that online commenting has enabled, combined with commenters thinking their take is valid/important/whatever. Maybe narcissistic but I can’t say for sure. At any rate, it’s another good way to destroy a community - especially one with self reinforcing mechanism like voting that basically ensures you’re on rails (with apologies to dhh)

alganet · 7h ago
It is expected that filtering based on digital content will become a thing for a while. It's one of those obvious, but misguided, uses of recent technologies.

I don't know about restaurants, but in regards to other kinds of silos, it is likely that those filters will go down once quality data availability becomes a problem.

In the restaurant analogy, you can say that if the salloon is empty, they'll let people in because they can't survive without them.

jqpabc123 · 6h ago
Seems like the potential start of a dystopian nightmare to me.

Wouldn't be better for all concerned if a 2 star restaurant worked at providing better food and service instead of privacy invasion and exploitation of the vain?

AznHisoka · 6h ago
There are exactly 2 restaurants I recommend to people, and invite family/friends to when they’re visiting.

Absolutely none of these restaurants know who I am, do anything special for me, or even know my favorite dishes.

The only thing they have in common is they consistently make delicious tasting food. And they probably focus a lot on doing that. Its that simple.

CoastalCoder · 38m ago
I assume you're referring to Jacques Imo's in New Orleans, then :)
zacharycohn · 5h ago
For people who go to these restaurants, this is better service. You wouldn't find this happening at Red Robin. This is what they are paying for.

If it's not for you, that's fine.

sublinear · 5h ago
I think you totally could replicate these experiences without the restaurant involved. Fun surprises are nice, but the absurdity of having the restaurant provide these kinds of experiences seems tacky.

I don't think I'm alone in wanting the restaurant's personality to be just as much a part of the experience as my own personality. Otherwise, what makes this place more special than any other wanting to pull the same gimmicks?

sublinear · 5h ago
Despite much hype, past a certain point even the highest end food really is... just food.

The service is what people really pay for, and there I agree that there should be much more interesting ideas to elevate the experience than bringing in a baby penguin. I don't see anything in the article as particularly creative.

JumpCrisscross · 1h ago
> past a certain point even the highest end food really is... just food

That point is still well up there. The difference between hours-picked tomatoes and Aramark sludge is worth paying for.

smitelli · 6h ago
I gotta say, I don't have the right personality traits to enjoy this kind of personal attention a lot of the time.

I've had experiences where the counter staff at my daily breakfast place started to recognize me and know what "usual" my order was going to be without my having to say it... and it really weirded me out more than anything else.

Sometimes I just want to be a faceless nobody, forgotten day after day by the businesses I visit and the public spaces I navigate.

JumpCrisscross · 1h ago
> I don't have the right personality traits to enjoy this kind of personal attention a lot of the time

Have friends who work at the Four Seasons. This—low service interaction—is a common type of personalised attention patrons want.

I don’t think there is a social media cue for it. But even as someone who’s fairly extroverted, I got a note indicating I should be left alone if dining alone and reading.

mingus88 · 6h ago
Yeah I’m heavily introverted and feel the same way. It establishes a kind of social pressure that if I fail to hold up my side of the relationship I just get anxious
satvikpendem · 6h ago
If you go so often that people remember you, I mean, what do you expect, that they somehow block the memory of you from their mind?
steveBK123 · 6h ago
Social Credit Score, but privatized
kube-system · 6h ago
Of which, the name comes from the US concept of “credit score” which was always privatized.
yieldcrv · 6h ago
Americans only care that the organization that can kill and arrest isn’t controlling all facets of life

But are tolerant that corporations do the exact same things in their society

asdf6969 · 34m ago
Maybe I’ll start taking pictures of the owners kids playing in the yard so I can establish a better relationship with the business and get better service.
joenot443 · 6h ago
Honestly, this just seems like really creative and earnest hospitality. To summarize the somewhat fluffy piece -

> Kirk also has a gigantic database of each guest — about 115,000 people — and knows how many times they’ve dined at Lazy Bear since it first opened as a supper club in 2009. She then dives into social media and finds extra information that is publicly available to get a sense of who the guests are before they come in. Finally, she puts all the data she’s gathered into a color-coded Google document that every member of the team, front and back of house, studies.

“We get hundreds of emails a day, and the intimate details that some people are willing to share, sometimes we’re like ‘Holy crap. I can’t believe you told us that,’” Booth said. “But then there’s the fun, the literal joy, our team feels when they get to make these special touches with those details.”

--

That sounds great to me! I think some commenters are imagining a kind of Black Mirror meets Berghain meets social credit scenario, but it seems like really none of those things. Cynically, one could perhaps paint it as another clever way for Bay Area folks to convert capital into emotionally emulated human experiences, though even amongst that list I'd consider it one of the more wholesome.

borski · 6h ago
I completely agree with you.
ChrisMarshallNY · 6h ago
Good luck with that.

Pretty much the only social media I participate in, is ... here. I guess the Bay Area might take HN seriously, but I live in NY.

shiftpgdn · 6h ago
That's ok, you'll get the same treatment everyone else got before they started this trend. "Normies" with their lives on the standard socials will get extra attention or special treatment at no detriment to you.
Spivak · 6h ago
The example in the article is about getting to know your patrons so no social presence would be fine, but for what you're talking about with actual filtering no social presence would be an immediate rejection so I wouldn't be so smug.
ChrisMarshallNY · 6h ago
Not smug. I just don’t do social media. I know many folks, with lots of money, that are similar to me.

If SMBs want to reject us, because we aren’t posting every meal on TikTok, then they only have themselves to blame.

vntok · 6h ago
What does being rich have anything to do with this?

You seem to think SMB rejecting you is only a problem for them, have you considered that them rejecting you also means that you don't get service from them?

ChrisMarshallNY · 6h ago
Hey listen.

Sorry if what I wrote, offended. Didn’t mean to.

So we’re done.

renewiltord · 6h ago
Haha this is fantastic. I suppose we must have been uninteresting guests to these places because we didn't get this degree of personalization but the food was great. A lot of these 3 Mich experiences are experiences and not just a dining alone thing so I totally get it. Fun stuff!
pseingatl · 7h ago
Just like China's social credit system.
ethan_smith · 6h ago
There's a fundamental difference - restaurants checking if you like wine on Instagram to enhance service is optional and consequence-free, while China's system is mandatory with significant legal and financial penalties.
bluescrn · 6h ago
Until they start denying people service because they expressed support for the wrong political party or took the wrong side on a divisive social issue.

No comments yet

steveBK123 · 6h ago
Surely once this becomes the norm and more business do it, it will only ever be used for good.. right.. ?
satvikpendem · 6h ago
Their social credit system doesn't actually exist in the way most people think it does, it was a top down mandate that each province was expected to implement in their own way, often without coordination.

https://youtu.be/Kqov6F00KMc

borski · 6h ago
Except nothing like it? This article isn’t about filtering guests out, but about creating additional tailored experiences to those who do attend.
bigyabai · 7h ago
Well sure, but for private enterprise.
allears · 7h ago
I would never eat at a restaurant that would let people like me in.

(Thanks, Groucho)

EA-3167 · 6h ago
Like many here, before I read the article I assumed this was intended to be some sort of filtering mechanism... which is a bit dystopian, but IMO the truth is much MUCH more bizarre.

We're talking about a fancy restaurant that researches you and your social media to better cater to you and make you feel "special". I think I'd prefer that this just be an extension of the velvet rope, bouncers have been around for ages, but this feels genuinely creepy.

> “The information is used as a precursor to gain more of an understanding of who our guests are,” general manager Akeel Shah explained to SFGATE. “We may not even use the information, but it gives us a better way to tailor the experience and make it memorable.”

Eewwww, no. Just no. It really feels like someone watched 'The Menu', missed the entire point of the movie, and just thought "Hey wouldn't it be neat if WE knew everything about our customers before they arrived?"

volleygman180 · 1h ago
I haven't seen The Menu, but try watching The Bear instead. They demonstrate this level-of-service & mentality and it's much more sincere than you think.
EA-3167 · 49m ago
The Menu is... overly sincere, I won't spoil it, but it's the "Restaurant as cult environment" movie. In fact the question of lacking sincerity is framed as "the audience casually disregards the immense effort and dedication requires to achieve what you demand."

...Now that's probably using restaurants as a metaphor for the film industry, but either way the point holds. I'm not put off by insincerity, it's forced, false intimacy as a product or a service goal that bothers me. Good food, good (not fawning) service is more than enough for me, I don't need this kind of race-to-the-bottom Michelin stars seem to inspire.