He's got 4 more years. If he fails, labour has a massive majority and can select a new prime minister.
This isn't meant to invalidate criticism but there isn't a strong equivalent to the 1922 backbench committee and in any event, labour has an unassailable majority. So Starmer can basically continue to muddle through for a considerable period of time.
He's got 4 more years. If he fails, labour has a massive majority and can select a new prime minister.
This isn't meant to invalidate criticism but there isn't a strong equivalent to the 1922 backbench committee and in any event, labour has an unassailable majority. So Starmer can basically continue to muddle through for a considerable period of time.