Ask HN: Where are the best online gathering places for humans?
7 points by jMyles 1d ago 11 comments
Ask HN: Is context-switching the real productivity killer?
9 points by kristel100 22h ago 2 comments
MAGA's March Toward a Command Economy
21 cocacola1 12 8/22/2025, 1:01:55 AM insights.som.yale.edu ↗
As long as we have the heavy-handed Federal Reserve - tilting the game to pick winners and losers - we don’t have free-market capitalism.
Funny enough, I heard an interview with Robert Reich early today about his new book. I didn’t hear the full interview but in the time I listening he didn’t get close to naming the Fed. I was dumbfounded.
The truth is, the socioeconomic system and the sociopolitical system sits on a foundation. That foundation is the financial system. The Fed sits at the head of the table of the financial system. The Fed pulls the levers. The Fed shakes the snow globe.
Also, I'd argue the bond market is far more powerful than the Fed. The Fed can set short term target rates, but the bond market sets longer term rates. The bond market is what kept this admin in check earlier in the year. One might say they are the Fifth Estate, after journalism and the three branches of US government. "Whoever holds the gold makes the rules."
https://tisegroup.com/news/2025/the-power-of-the-bond-market...
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/08/12/what-to-k...
https://www.bloomberg.com/explainers/bond-vigilantes | https://archive.today/XcRIq
> Have bond vigilantes influenced government decision-making before?
> Yes. In fact, they’ve already influenced Trump’s decision-making. In the hours after Trump’s long-awaited tariffs on most imports to the US went into effect on April 9, the bond market tanked. Many investors, concerned that the duties would accelerate inflation and reduce foreign demand for US assets, started dumping their holdings in order to pressure the administration to reverse course.
> It worked: Just 13 hours after the tariffs had gone into effect, Trump announced that he would pause them, and yields came down. “The bond market is very tricky,” he conceded. “I was watching it.”
This is why Trump and MAGA will make the FED less heavy-handed and increase the freedom of the free market, right? ... Right?
Hmmm. Perhaps the principle advantage of a Trump decision is their short shelf life, all done until the next 3am doom scroll on the Golden Shitter hits poor reception from the bond market or an unkind word from Putin.
Did it cross your mind they could, in fact, be worse?
And do you really think setting up rules to be followed by everyone - after careful deliberation and contradictory debate by hundreds of persons in several branches of government - is the same as bending backwards to the contradictory and unstable whims of a 79 y.o. mobster seeking only loyalty to himself?
See rent control, for just a tiny example.
>They greatly interfere with the operation of the free market.
No, regulation in itself is not interfereing with free markets. It depends. There are tons of regulation in very free markets, that have been voted by very liberal people, to avoid market manipulation, insider trading, etc...
>I'm not defending what Trump is doing with this.
The Democrats aren't in control of the Presidency, Congress, the Senate and the Supreme Court. Why did you insert them?